Aa

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

A response to Louise Adler from a Zionist humanitarian

Adler’s characterisation of Israel as inherently racist ignores the vision of a democratic Jewish state.
Ronald Sackville
Print this
Israel flag with a thought bubble of a peace dove

Illustration: TJI

Published: 23 September 2024

Last updated: 23 September 2024

Louise Adler’s piece in The Age and Sydney Morning Herald ('These are the things I've learnt you can't ask about Israel', 21 September) demonstrates convincingly the truth of her opening admission that she ‘is no foreign policy expert’. But she certainly claims to be extraordinarily perceptive.

Adler was immediately able to recognise the ‘entrenched racism [and] anti-democratic’ character of the ‘Zionist project’ upon landing at Ben Gurion Airport in 1972. This realisation came to her because she perceived that Middle Eastern Jews (not European Jews) were the mere baggage handlers and Palestinians (presumably Arab Israeli citizens) cleaned the toilets. Apparently, the airport had only one toilet and Adler had developed facial recognition capacity before the concept existed.

Adler’s analysis is said to flow from her standing as a human being. But it is not only ahistorical, it is entirely lacking in any understanding of the many forms of Zionism.

Adler acknowledges that the core of Zionism is support for the existence of a safe, secure and peaceful Jewish state. At first blush it is difficult to comprehend how someone professing Jewish identity can express surprise – indeed dismay – that so many Jews feel a strong emotional attachment to Israel for religious, historical, cultural or familial reasons. There is, however, an explanation for her bewilderment.

Adler’s analysis is said to flow from her standing as a human being. But it is not only ahistorical, it is entirely lacking in any understanding of the many forms of Zionism.

Adler is utterly unable to grasp that one can be a Zionist yet contend for a Jewish AND democratic Israel that respects and promotes the dignity and human rights of all its citizens. This is the position of hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Jewish Israelis.

It is also the position of some local organisations. The New Israel Fund, for example, does not limit itself to pained rhetoric, but provides material support to organisations and projects within Israel and the Occupied Territories fighting to protect the human rights of non-Jewish Israeli and Palestinians.

Adler also cannot grasp that one can be a Zionist and:

  1. Vehemently oppose the oppressive policies and practices of the current extreme right wing government (which includes criminals and even supporters of terrorism).
  2. Reject the settlement project as it expands the number and size of settlements in the Occupied Territories.
  3. Condemn the brutal behavior of some religious fanatics and extreme nationalists among settlers in the Occupied Territories.
  4. Strongly support the creation of a Palestinian state capable of living alongside Israel peacefully, even if not enthusiastically (just like Egypt) and even if this goal seems for the moment unattainable.

Adler says she supports the rights of Palestinians to self-determination, sovereignty and their own state. The logic of her position is that Israel is an illegitimate, inherently racist state that does not deserve to exist and therefore should be replaced by a ‘sovereign’ Palestinian state. Yet she lacks the courage to say so.

Adler may not be an antisemite, but the comparison she makes with Nazi Germany will be music to the ears of every antisemite.

Finally, Adler’s attempt to equate the horrors of Gaza with the experiences of the Warsaw Ghetto is not only offensive but disgusting. One can plausibly argue that the IDF has exercised excessive force in Gaza and perhaps committed some war crimes during the course of the war.

But the invasion occurred and continues as a direct response to a hideous massacre (including rape) and kidnapping of innocents by a genocidal and ruthless fighting force explicitly committed to the destruction of Israel. The Warsaw Ghetto was an unspeakably horrific prelude to the immaculately organised transportation and annihilation of every man, woman and child in the Ghetto, together with three million other Jewish Poles.

Adler may not be an antisemite, but the comparison she makes with Nazi Germany will be music to the ears of every antisemite.

About the author

Ronald Sackville

The Honourable Ronald Sackville AO KC is former Judge and Chair of Royal Commission. He has written on Anti-Semitism and Hate Speech: (2016) Australian Law Journal 631 and is on the Advisory Board of NIF Australia.

Comments3

  • Avatar of David Schulberg

    David Schulberg27 September at 02:28 am

    Check out the mythbuster on Louise Adler that I produced that was aired this week on the L’Chaim program on 3ZZZ
    https://omny.fm/shows/israel-connexion/louise-adler-mythbuster

  • Avatar of Sara Vidal

    Sara Vidal24 September at 01:57 pm

    very good succinct measured response. i found Louise’s comparison with the Warsaw ghetto (which my parent’s survived but their families did not) so disgusting I could only rage.

  • Avatar of Ivan

    Ivan24 September at 07:44 am

    A thoughtful, insightful destruction of Adler and all she tries to argue. Well done Ron!
    It’s a real pity your response won’t receive the circulation and publicity of Adler’s inaccurate, deceitful and disdain-filled OpEd.
    According to Michael Gawenda, Adler is beyond redemption.

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

Enter site