Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenIsrael
FeatureIsrael

From Kibbutz to Perth: Nachshon Goltz on the lasting trauma of a lost childhood

Nachshon Goltz describes his upbringing on Kibbutz Ruhama as a “cruel psychological experiment”, allegations that contributed to a class action against the Israeli state. Decades later, he believes the ongoing trauma of communal child-rearing left kibbutzim vulnerable to October 7.
Shahar Burla
Print this
A group of children in soccer uniforms

Nachshon Goltz as a child (positioned fourth from LHS as goalkeeper) with his peers in Kibbutz Ruhama (Image: supplied).

Published: 19 March 2025

Last updated: 20 March 2025

In October 2024, Israeli author Yael Neeman published Were You Good or Were You Bad?, a book that delves into the history and profound effects of communal child-rearing in kibbutzim.

Neeman’s starting point was a pivotal Haaretz article by Vered Levy Barzilai entitled, The Accusation: A Cruel Experiment on Thousands of Children. The article featured an interview with Nachshon (Sean) Goltz, who was born and raised in Kibbutz Ruhama, and described kibbutz communal child-rearing as a “cruel psychological experiment”.

“This may evolve into a class action that will shake generations of kibbutz members," read the opening line of the Haaretz article, which was first published in December 2000.

"But even if not, this is a serious public indictment: Nachshon Goltz, born in Kibbutz Ruhama, is planning on suing the kibbutz movement for committing a psychological experiment on thousands of children with disastrous results – they became emotionally crippled, without a family or a home, lacking identity, and sometimes victims of sexual abuse.

"Anyone growing up in Israel knows Goltz is not speaking only for himself.”

These allegations led to a claim against the Israeli state, which had allowed the kibbutzim to become the legal guardian of children instead of their own parents, contradicting guardianship laws.

"Goltz’s theory is a monumental moment in the public discourse on kibbutz child-rearing."

Anthropologist Tama Halfin

But the legal action was dismissed by a judge who was concerned about broader implications — particularly the precedent that could see every boarding school child sue the state. Nevertheless, the Haaretz article and the lawsuit made a significant public impact.

Anthropologist Tama Halfin described the magnitude of Goltz’s theory as “a monumental moment in the public discourse on kibbutz child-rearing,” stating that Goltz’s terminology and assumptions have since formed the basis of every discussion on the topic.

Goltz today (Image: supplied).
Goltz today (Image: supplied).

Goltz, now 56 and a senior lecturer in the school of business and law at Edith Cowan University in Perth – where he has lived since 2018 – still carries the trauma of his upbringing.

'The effects are still ongoing'

Speaking to The Jewish Independent, Goltz said “they experimented on me. Not just me, but thousands of us, and the effects are still ongoing”.

Goltz describes how, as a primary-school-aged child, he and his peers only spent four hours a day with their parents, who were referred to by their first names and not ‘mum’ or ‘dad’.

"Out of 24 hours in a day, I was with [my parents] for only three or four. For the rest, we were left to ourselves."

Nachshon Goltz

This, he argues, symbolised a deeper emotional detachment: “What are parents? Does the fact that two people gave birth to a child make them parents? Out of 24 hours in a day, I was with [my parents] for only three or four. For the rest, we were left to ourselves.

“Until high school, we would leave the kibbutz only twice a year. We were cut off. Because my kibbutz was small, there was a two-year gap between the kids in my group. When you sleep and shower together, you can imagine the traumas that are created.”

Leaving kibbutzim vulnerable to October 7

Goltz believes the communal sleeping arrangements in kibbutzim led to further disconnection from traditional family structures.

He argues this breakdown contributed to the decline of the kibbutz movement’s influence in Israeli society and ultimately left those communities vulnerable during the October 7 Hamas attacks.

"On October 7, the kibbutzim were hit the hardest," Goltz explained.

"The reason for this is the trauma of the second and third generations who grew up with shared sleeping and left the kibbutzim. From my year group of 18 children, only two or three still live in the kibbutz today, and even they returned after a long period. They all left because they were not willing to raise their children the way they themselves were raised — and the trauma remained even after the practice of communal child rearing stopped.

"The moment the kibbutz children did not return after the army as adults, the kibbutz movement lost its relevance — from the state's perspective and from a practical perspective. This resulted in no special interest in protecting them, and as they lost relevance, settlers took the lead in Israeli society, with their support of the occupation contributing to the events of October 7."

The cover of Neeman’s book <em>Were You Good or Were You Bad?</em> (Image: supplied).
The cover of Neeman’s book Were You Good or Were You Bad? (Image: supplied).

Goltz contends that the Israeli state approved the 'experiment' because it served its interests, among them producing good soldiers. However, the kibbutz's goal was to create a new kind of person — one best suited to the socialist communal life of the kibbutz.

Goltz believes the experiment ultimately failed because it went against human nature, leaving many former kibbutz children emotionally-stunted and disconnected from basic human concepts including home, family and love.

"This was one of the biggest child-rearing experiments of the 21st century, and it should never have happened."

Nachshon Goltz

After a long personal journey, Goltz now feels like the 'new person' the experiment was trying to create, but on his own terms. He says he has developed a balanced approach to money and work; reclaimed his Judaism which was suppressed in the kibbutz; and embraced parenting in a way he never experienced as a child.

He is grateful for the renewed attention that Neeman’s book has brought to the subject of communal sleeping in kibbutzim, and is currently translating her book into English so it can reach more people.

"My story is not unique, and my feelings strike a chord with many who grew up in similar conditions. This was one of the biggest child-rearing experiments of the 21st century, and it should never have happened. There is a lot to learn from this experience."

You might also like
  • How two divergent views of Oct 7 could shape Israel’s election
    Dan Perry
  • Do Israelis care that Trump has endorsed Netanyahu?
    Ruth Eglash
  • Security fears and incitement drive young voters toward far-right
    Ben Lynfield
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Gaza after street map
    Israel Hamas WarFeatureIsrael

    One year after the ceasefire, Gaza remains in ruins with no solution in sight

    Shahar Burla 2
    Israel election posters
    Israel Votes 2026ExplainerIsrael

    Stalemate likely in Israel’s election: latest polls

    Shahar Burla 1
    IOct 7 anniversary
    Israel Hamas WarEditorialIsrael

    Three years after Oct 7: an anniversary of reckoning

    The Jewish Independent 1

About the author

Shahar Burla

Shahar Burla

Dr Shahar Burla is a Sydney-based researcher, lecturer and Contributing Editor of TJI. Shahar holds a Master’s degree in political science from Hebrew University and a PhD in political science from Bar-Ilan University. He is the author of Political Imagination in the Diaspora: The Construction of a Pro-Israeli Narrative (2013) and co-editor of Australia and Israel: A Diasporic, Cultural and Political Relationship (2015).

More from the author

FeatureIsrael

One year after the ceasefire, Gaza remains in ruins with no solution in sight

FeatureIsrael

Netanyahu’s lightning UN visit reveals his growing isolation

ExplainerIsrael

Israel election explainer: the main parties

FeatureIsrael

New evidence Netanyahu was warned about October 7