Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
AnalysisAustralia

New National Holocaust Memorial divides Canberra Jewish community

Canberra’s Jewish community has agreed to allow a new a new National Holocaust Memorial and Education Centre to be built within its community centre, but some are worried it may traumatise children or turn the community into ‘zoo exhibits’.
Ron Levy
Print this
Canberra Jewish community centre

The existing National Jewish Memorial Centre, with Parliament House in the background (Ben Wrigley/ Phillip Gleeson Architects)

Published: 27 November 2025

Last updated: 27 November 2025

Canberra’s small Jewish community has voted to allow a new National Holocaust Memorial and Education Centre (NHMEC) to be built partly within the territory’s main synagogue and community centre.

The matter had been dividing the community for months – albeit gently, in a Canberra sort of way. At issue is whether the Holocaust, and its various forms of remembrance, belong at the centre of Jewish life.

The federal government has promised to fund the new Holocaust centre, which will serve the whole of Australia and keep alive memories of the tragic period.

Many members, however, have wondered at the wisdom of integrating Holocaust images and memories into the daily life of the community centre. Some have asked whether kids will need to navigate past images of emaciated children in striped pyjamas en route to their weekly cheder. Others are concerned about security risks – for example, how the physical separation between a public museum and the community centre will function.

I fear I may hesitate to bring my son to the community centre one day because of the heavy Holocaust content it will now showcase

The plan that has been accepted will put Holocaust remembrance areas partly adjacent to, but also partly overlapping with, the ACT Jewish Community’s existing buildings, the National Jewish Memorial Centre. A Memorial Hall will be shared in common, available for use either by the community or by visiting school groups.

A vocal minority has opposed this model for some time. Some have barracked for another option that would set Holocaust remembrance areas in a separate building, though still on the same grounds.

This is a friendly and welcoming Jewish community. But as a new member, I have spent recent months partly in an anthropological mode, seeking to decode the divergent groups and their motivations.

Those who tend to speak out in favour of integration of the community and memorial generally do so in principled terms. Former MP Mike Kelly has been a consistent supporter. Other less famous members, however, have also voiced eloquent and emotive arguments. To commemorate the people lost in the Holocaust, some say, we must show the world active Jewish communities of today – those who carry on the baton of Jewish life and culture.

Others have more prosaic reasons for opting for integration. Integration will be cheaper than building a new building from scratch. This is a rare opportunity to refurbish aging facilities in a small community that can scarcely afford capital works without outside help.

Many proponents of the integrated memorial have spoken of carrying out promises made to Holocaust survivors – parents or grandparents who’d asked them to commit to keeping the memory of traumas of the past alive. Indeed, many proponents (though not all) are among the community’s older members. Some are concerned to help create a solid and permanent memorial in the time remaining to them.

But some of the younger members have expressed deep qualms over the past months. Is the idea that school students will come to see not only our ancestors departed in the Holocaust, but us – us at work and play in the centre, as live Jews – appropriate? I side with those who suspect it isn’t. It risks putting the Jew of today in a sort of zoo of our own making, for others to observe us in our unique habits and rituals. It is not a position I want my own son to be in.

Neither do I wish him to have to contend with Holocaust memories as a daily matter, simply because he is growing up in the nation’s capital. The Holocaust is one of the seminal moments in Jewish history – but it is only one. There are many others, including others more of our own making and more positive. We are not a death cult, but I sometimes fear that focusing excessively on the dark era of the Holocaust puts us at risk of becoming one.

My own preference would have been an option that hasn’t been much discussed: a proper, significant Holocaust memorial at the Australian War Memorial complex. The AWM’s purposes, after all, include showing why Australians fought in past wars, and chronicling wars’ many horrors.

But though I disagree with the recent decision, how community members have conducted themselves has profoundly impressed me. The AGM, for instance, was conducted like a town hall of Jews – carefully reasoned back-and-forth arguments were the norm. The community’s treasurer ably presided over the debate, bringing any unruly conversation under control. I heard just a few frustrated outbursts from members (‘Jesus Christ!’ the most ironic). Indeed, for several months, in this city of public servants, academics, teachers, etc, the level of policy detail under discussion has been breathtaking.

Most important, perhaps, the two camps have always seemed to recognise each other’s good will and intentions. Two visions of the place – both literal and figurative – of the Holocaust in Jewish life have come into competition with each other.

The one I relate to the least has won out, and I fear I may hesitate to bring my son to the community centre one day because of the heavy Holocaust content it will now showcase.

But I hope that even as the committee marches ahead with an integrated Holocaust memorial on the synagogue grounds, Jewish life in the capital will focus on diverse living Judaism – not only the Holocaust but Jewish life beyond.

You might also like
  • ‘Our children already belong’: Petition calls Jewish schools to cooperate for disabled support
    Gideon Cohen
  • Freedom Rides: Allyship for dark times
    Eliezer Rubenstein Sturgess
  • Learning from the Jewish refugee story
    Peter Kohn
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    JA06
    FeatureArts & Culture

    From Bondi to the Tree of Life

    Gideon Cohen
    csg security
    FeatureAustralia

    When security clashes with hospitality

    Jarod Rhine-Davis
    Online hate
    AnalysisAustralia

    Social media regulation is a necessary brake on harmful speech

    Dean Sherr 1

About the author

Ron Levy

Ron Levy

Professor Ron Levy, of the ANU Law School, researches how contentious societal problems — eg Indigenous constitutional reform, human rights, and peace and conflict — can be managed through legal and democratic deliberation. His books include Deliberative Peace Referendums (Oxford University Press) and The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2018).