Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
Israel Hamas WarNewsAustralia

How a New York Times reporter caused the Australian Jewish doxing scandal

In February, The Jewish Independent revealed that the identities of 600 Jewish creatives had been leaked. Now the NYT has confirmed that its reporter was the source of the leak.
TJI Wrap
Print this
New York Times building

The New York Times building in Manhattan (EPA/Sarah Yenesel)

Published: 3 September 2024

Last updated: 3 September 2024

In February, The Jewish Independent broke the story about the leaking (‘doxing”) of personal details of 600 members of a Jewish WhatsApp support group by anti-Zionist activists, leading to death threats against a Melbourne family, the ruin of their business and months of vilification for many others whose details were disclosed.

The identities of those who leaked the details of the Jewish creatives were soon discovered and published. But one crucial aspect of the saga has remained unknown: how did the information get into their hands in the first place?

Six months on, the source has been revealed and the story has gone international, enmeshing one of the world’s most prestigious newspapers, The New York Times, with one of its journalists named in media reports last month as Ground Zero of the leak.

The reporter’s name is Natasha Frost, a Times reporter based in Melbourne, who was an early member of the WhatsApp group,” the Wall Street Journal reported, in a story republished by The Australian on August 27.

I shared this document with one individual. Its subsequent dissemination and misuse happened entirely without my knowledge or consent.

Natasha Frost, New York Times reporter

“Frost downloaded about 900 pages of content from the chat thread and shared it with the subject of an article she had worked on. Later, the information wound up in the hands of the activists,” the WSJ report said.

The New York Times said it had taken “appropriate action” against Natasha Frost but did not elaborate on what that was, the WSJ added, and that Frost remains on staff. Frost has not named to whom she passed the information.

But she said in a statement released by The Times: “I shared this document with one individual. Its subsequent dissemination and misuse happened entirely without my knowledge or consent. I was shocked by these events, which put me and many others at terrible risk. I deeply regret my decision,” the WSJ reported.

The WhatsApp group was founded in October, in response to a wave of anti-Zionist hostility after the Hamas attacks that sparked the Gaza war. Frost was invited to the group in early November after she had written a story about the revival of Yiddish in Melbourne and had become friendly with one of the Yiddish activists she interviewed.

The New York Times said it had taken 'appropriate action' against Natasha Frost but did not elaborate on what that was.

Although the WhatsApp group was envisaged as a support vehicle and not intended as a forum for political debate, some members veered into advocacy. “In December, some members of the group shared a call-to-action to challenge the impartiality of Antoinette Lattouf, a writer who had been given a five-day gig hosting a radio morning show for the ABC,” the WSJ reported. “Members of another WhatsApp group, for Jewish lawyers, also engaged in a similar effort.”

The ABC terminated Lattouf’s gig early on the grounds that her use of social media “had not complied with a direction”. Lattouf denied the allegation and has mounted several challenges to her “unlawful termination”.

Frost co-wrote a story about the internal tensions around the ABC’s decision. “Several days before the story, Frost texted an administrator of the WhatsApp group to say that she was leaving the group to avoid, among other things, any perception that she would violate the privacy of its members. She said it was likely she would write about Lattouf,” the WSJ said.

“Around the time the Times story was published, some details from the WhatsApp group began to leak out online on a youth-focused news and entertainment site. As more material from the chat began circulating via the pro-Palestinian activists, members of the WhatsApp group began to face harassment.”

Why has the Times not covered this story beyond being forced to admit to a Wall Street Journal reporter that the Times journalist had behaved inappropriately?

Michael Gawenda, former Editor-in-Chief of the Age

Former editor-in-chief of The Age, Michael Gawenda, was scathing about the New York Times’ response to the incident. “Why has the Times not covered this story beyond being forced to admit to a Wall Street Journal reporter that the Times journalist had behaved inappropriately? … What responsibility does the Times editors take for what happened (to those scores of Jewish Australians who were doxed as a result of what the reporter did?)”

Jeremy Leibler, the President of the Zionist Federation of Australia, also called on the NYT to take a more active response.  “The impact of this leak and alleged breach of journalistic standards on doxxed members of the Jewish creative community has been profound,” he said.

“We expect The New York Times will undertake a thorough investigation, and anyone found to be knowingly complicit in the dissemination of this material should be held appropriately accountable.”

Jewish philanthropists have said they are in ­“despair” as they push back against the antisemitism that has ­exploded in the wake of the Israel-Gaza conflict, prompting Jewish ­donors withdraw or redirect their funding deals with environmental, women’s or arts groups.

Lillian Kline, head of philanthropy for the Victor Smorgon group, said the fallout from the ­Israel-Gaza war “has had a massive impact on, not just Jewish philanthropy, but philanthropy across the board in Australia’’ and left some Jewish donor families in “despair’’.

“For Jewish people it has led to absolutely a re-examination of strategic priorities of funding, and there were many conversations in the wake of October 7 to strategically fund both Jewish and non-Jewish organisations in the wake of rising anti-Semitism,’’ she said.

READ MORE
Death threats, boycotts target Jewish creatives
(The Jewish Independent)

How a NYT reporter’s leak led to an Australian uproar (The Australian)

New York Times doxing scandal is a shameful story of failed media ethics
(The Australian)

NYT must investigate chat leak further, says Jewish Australian lawyer (AFR)

Jewish donors are pulling and redirecting their funds as they ‘despair’ at rise of anti-Semitism (The Australian)

You might also like
  • Sanctioning settlements is a defence of Israel, not an attack
    Elisheva Madar
  • Sanctions must influence, not just perform disapproval
    Adam Slonim
  • Mind the mentality: not every rejection is antisemitism
    Nomi Kaltmann
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Tame
    Australia

    Tame apologises – but with little grace

    Deborah Stone 1
    Woman with land and houses behind her
    NewsAustralia

    Australia to increase sanctions against West Bank settlements

    Deborah Stone 2
    antisemitism online
    NewsAustralia

    Proposed digital care law to offer protection against online antisemitism

    Deborah Stone

About the author

TJI Wrap

TJI Wrap

TJI wraps consolidate essential news and analysis from multiple sources into digestable summaries.

More from the author

NewsAustralia

War crimes allegations against Australian IDF soldier

NewsWorld

Wave of attacks on Jewish sites sparks international alarm

AnalysisIsrael

Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iran: Israel’s tense security landscape

AnalysisIsrael

Middle East on edge as Iran and Israel inch closer to another war

Comments1

  • Avatar of David Bergman

    David Bergman12 September at 01:31 am

    its shocking but expected from the Pro Pal circles who are just about hatred of Jews.