Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenIsrael
Israel Hamas WarAnalysisIsraelWorld

Why journalists are failing to do their jobs reporting Gaza

Former Age Editor Michael Gawenda explains the way the media works - or fails to work - in reporting the Israel-Hamas War.
Michael Gawenda
Print this
Man in press vest

Since the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, more than 100 journalists and media workers have been killed (Noam Galai/Getty Images).

Published: 27 March 2024

Last updated: 28 March 2024

Since the war between Israel and Hamas began on October 7, hundreds of foreign journalists from across the world, including journalists and film crews from Japan and China and Russia, have filed countless news stories, analysis pieces, filmed interviews with suffering Palestinian women and children and above all, an endless stream of the most heart-rending videos of the daily carnage in Gaza.

These hundreds of journalists are based in Israel from where they do their reporting. Their film crews are based in Israel. Some of the big US television networks have teams of 20 or more—reporters, camera operators, sound recordists— producing the network news coverage of Gaza. They are all based in Israel.

There are no foreign journalists in Gaza. The videos of carnage are taken by Gazans. A lot of the videos shown on screens across the world have been taken from social media. Some videos have been filmed by local journalists in Gaza and they are paid by the foreign media companies for it.

All the reports of what is happening in Gaza come from local journalists employed by the foreign media companies. Some of these journalists have proven to be members of Hamas. All of them do their journalism at the pleasure of Hamas. Was their reporting to displease Hamas, they would be forced out of journalism. One way or another.

Some of the local journalists have been killed by Israeli air strikes. The number is disputed. It is even in dispute how many of them were journalists rather that Hamas operatives and how many were killed doing journalism. The deaths of journalists covering a war is a war crime. But I do not believe there is any credible evidence that shows Israeli pilots deliberately targeted journalists.

Why am I writing about this, why does it matter when the people of Gaza are suffering so unthinkably, when so many women and children are being killed by the Israeli air strikes that have reduced much of Gaza to rubble?

Foreign journalists do not really know whether the news they are reporting out of Gaza is anywhere near factually accurate.

It matters because the hundreds of foreign journalists and film crews and international affairs journalists, in effect, do not want their audiences to know that they have only limited knowledge of what is happening in Gaza.

In fact, they hardly know anything that is based on their own first-hand reporting. They are all based in Israel, in Jerusalem in the main, which in the context of this war, is a long way from Gaza.

 On top of that, the vast majority do not speak Hebrew or Arabic. As a result, most of them, even those who are based in Israel and are not visiting `firemen’ who have flown in to cover a `hot’ story about which they have read a bit on the flight to Tel Aviv, know few non-English speaking Israelis or Palestinians.  As a result, in their reporting, Israel and Palestine, Israelis and Palestinians, exist only as actors in a bitter, century long, seemingly forever conflict.

How many of the hundreds of foreign journalists have told their readers and their television audiences anything about this, about how their lack of Hebrew and Arabic restricts their reporting?

Since October 7, I have written a fair bit about how the ethical standards that I thought most mainstream journalists had signed on to are being discarded, thrown out with yesterday’s news.

The many petitions and group letters that have circulated since October 7, signed and in some cases, instigated by journalists, with the support of the MEAA, the journalist’s union, in essence, call for new ethical standards in journalism. No longer was there to be a commitment to fairness, factual accuracy, open-mindedness, to journalism that was not agenda driven, that was in essence, a search for truth no matter how elusive and impossible to find the truth may be.

 Instead, according to the letter signers and petition signers—the many thousands of them in the US, Canada and Australia—journalists were to be committed to social justice , to supporting the oppressed against the oppressors, to  preferencing the voices of the oppressed― Palestinians  which sometimes includes Hamas—over the voices of the oppressors― Israelis and their Jewish supporters and lobbyists in the US and Canada and Australia. It was okay—more than okay—for journalists to be activists for a cause.

I have written virtually nothing about the coverage of the war basically because I think the short-comings of the journalism—its shallowness, its sameness, its cliché-ridden commentary and analysis―are self-evident.

What is not self-evident because journalists are not prepared to talk about it, is that they do not really know whether the news they are reporting out of Gaza is anywhere near factually accurate. They do not really know what is happening because they are not there and they are relying on statements coming from Hamas or from local journalists who have to work by rules determined by Hamas.  In truth, they cannot vouch for accuracy of their reporting and commentary, and they cannot check facts: they really don’t know what is true and what is false.

Local reporters in Gaza are simply forbidden by Hamas to practice journalism, to ask difficult questions. 

And yet the group letter writers and petition signers ignore all of this and instead, insist that Hamas’s version of the truth of what is happening in Gaza—the number of civilians killed and wounded by the IDF, the brutal treatment by the IDF of innocent Palestinians, the deliberate killing by the IDF of children and women, the deliberate humanitarian crisis  in Gaza engineered by Israel ― is essentially to be believed. 

Perhaps it is accurate, this stuff coming from Hamas but here are some questions that any journalist with even a modicum of experience and with an open mind would want the leaders of Hamas to answer, questions that simply have not been asked:

  • Is it true that you deliberately hide fighters and weapons in schools and hospitals and mosques? If it is true, why do that?
  • Why do you have your missile batteries located in the densest urban areas of Gaza?
  • Why, as the rulers of Gaza, did you not provide the residents of Gaza with bomb shelters to protect the innocents against Israeli airstrikes—you surely could have used some of the billions of dollars in aid for that purpose?
  • Why are you holding old people and children hostage? Is that not a war crime?
  • How many of the people killed in the war in Gaza were Hamas fighters? How do you arrive at a daily death toll, distinguishing so quickly between fighters and civilians?
  • What is the outcome you want from this war? What outcome could end it?

As far as I can tell these questions, rudimentary as they are, have not been asked of Hamas by the local reporters in Gaza. They are simply forbidden by Hamas to practice journalism, to ask difficult questions. 

Nor have these difficult questions been asked by the foreign reporters of the Hamas leadership in Qatar who have given any number of soft ‘interviews’ to Al Jazeera. Perhaps the Hamas officials in Qatar have refused to give interviews that answer these questions. If so, the journalists should say so and they should publish and broadcast the questions that have gone unanswered.

If the journalists have not asked these questions, then the only possible explanations I can think of is that the foreign reporters lack the courage to confront Hamas or that they think trying to force Hamas to be accountable for what it does is not important. Either way, this is a major reporting failure.

I think journalism is in crisis. I think more and more people believe that the mainstream media traffics in fake news.  With social media awash with conspiracy theories and lies and malign fantasies, with Tik Tok the main news source for millions of young people, there is a desperate need for journalism that is fair, factually accurate and honest. Dispassionate but not heartless.

This is not the sort of journalism that the petition and group letter signers are urging on those covering the war in Gaza. The line between the ethics of the social justice warriors on social media and the ethics of journalists in the mainstream media is becoming blurred. That is disastrous for journalism and journalists. And not to be too pompous, for liberal democracy as well.

You might also like
  • Brazilian Jews treated as pawns in presidential election
    Karina Stange Calandrin
  • There are three likely outcomes in Israel’s election. None is simple
    Sharon Offenberger
  • Planned non-Zionist Jewish school part of a growing US trend
    Shira Li Bartov
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    party map copy
    Israel Votes 2026NewsIsrael

    Parties, polls, processes: detailed election guide

    The Jewish Independent
    shahar nevo east jerusalem
    AnalysisIsrael

    Terror plot to kill hundreds of Arab Israelis thwarted

    Ben Lynfield
    Israel election posters
    Israel Votes 2026ExplainerIsrael

    Stalemate likely in Israel’s election: latest polls

    Shahar Burla 1

About the author

Michael Gawenda

Michael Gawenda

Michael Gawenda is one of Australia’s best-known journalists and authors. In a career spanning more than four decades, Michael has been a political reporter, foreign correspondent in London and Washington, and was editor and editor in chief of The Age from 1997 to 2004. He has won numerous journalism awards including three Walkley awards.

More from the author

OpinionAustralia

Anger, hatred and conspiracy theories: the rise of One Nation

OpinionAustralia

Battle of the books: The five books of Michael

FeatureWorld

Strangers connected by the indefinable bond of Jewish peoplehood

OpinionAustralia

Muslim Vote and antisemitism envoy are both artefacts of identity politics