Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenIsrael
AnalysisIsrael

An alternative vision for defeating Hamas 

The Israeli government says pounding Gaza is the only way to destroy Hamas. The centre-left has another plan.
Ittay Flescher
Print this
Rubble of bombed buildings with standing buildings in background

Destroyed homes in Khan Yunis, Gaza (AFP)

Published: 16 April 2025

Last updated: 16 April 2025

The vision of the Zionist right for defeating Hamas is well known. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu outlined it very clearly at his cabinet meeting on March 31. The government's plan for defeating Hamas relies on sustained military and diplomatic pressure, which he claims is already yielding results.  

Netanyahu’s strategy involves "pounding Hamas's military and governing capabilities" while simultaneously creating "the conditions for releasing our hostages." In the final stage, "Hamas will lay down its weapons," its leaders will leave, and Israel will ensure security in Gaza while allowing "the realization of the Trump plan for voluntary migration."  

The Zionist left is deeply discomforted by this vision, but what is its alternative? 

Eran Etzion outlined it to a group from The Democrats, a new centre-left political party formed from the remains of Labor and Meretz and led by Yair Golan. Etzion is an Israeli diplomat who served as an advisor during the Oslo negotiations and is on The  Democrats leadership council. 

He proposes implementing Phases Two and Three of the Hostage Deal, an agreement already signed by Netanyahu and Hamas on January 18. This deal would ensure the immediate release of all Israeli hostages while simultaneously ending the war and hopefully paving the way for prompt elections in Israel. 

Another key element of the plan is the establishment of a multinational force, potentially comprising Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and the UAE, with leadership under the Palestinian Authority.  

The bigger problem today is on our side. That is why replacing Netanyahu is essential in the next election

Eran Etzion

Etzion emphasized that the Palestinian leadership he envisions is not a government from other Arab countries but rather a Palestinian government that has the backing of the people, including some who are beginning to rise up against Hamas.   

Etzion argues Hamas would be unlikely to be able to resist the combination of Palestinian leadership and pan-Arab support and would be forced to relinquish power. This is not only because Hamas has been weakened by the war but also because the terrorist organisation has expressed, both publicly and privately, its willingness to relinquish control of Gaza to a Palestinian-led force, as it does not want the burden of civilian governance.   

The plan envisions a transitional government in Gaza that would initially function without elections. Hamas would not be included in this government, unlike in Lebanon where Hezbollah is a partner in government.  

A crucial aspect of the strategy involves rebuilding Gaza. The transitional government would oversee the distribution of financial aid from donor nations to facilitate reconstruction efforts as outlined by the $53 billion plan proposed by Egypt to rebuild Gaza.  

Etzion acknowledged the challenges of explaining this approach to Israelis. However, he argued that if it were presented as part of a broader regional initiative, including normalization with Saudi Arabia, it could be politically viable.  

"In any case, there is no real alternative here,” he said. “[Netanyahu’s] solution is not really a solution at all. It is to retake Gaza, which we did from 1967-2005, and to continue having our sons and daughters, and their children and even grandchildren fighting there forever to maintain military rule over Gaza and then eventually to force a transfer of all Palestinians from their homes. This, of course, will not happen. And if it does, it will split the people of Israel, divide the army, and destroy the peace agreement with Egypt." 

Eran Etzion speaks to supporters of The Democrats at a home in Jerusalem (Ittay Flescher)
Eran Etzion speaks to supporters of The Democrats at a home in Jerusalem (Ittay Flescher)

Israel’s next election 

Etzion believes the fate of Gaza and the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict should be the central issue in the next elections. Israelis will be presented with a clear choice: annexation and settlements or separation and a path to peace.  

While he acknowledges the centre-left’s vision depends on political will on both sides, Elzion claims, “The bigger problem today is on our side. That is why replacing Netanyahu is essential in the next election. The next government must abandon the failed policies of 'managing the conflict' and instead adopt a mindset focused on permanently solving it." 

But a reformed Palestinian Authority is also a a key player in this strategy. Steps to build the transitional government and the inter-Arab force that would take over Gaza after Hamas are already underway. In September 2024, Saudi Arabia launched the Global Alliance for Implementation of the Two-State Solution, together with Norway and the EU. Now comprising 85 countries—including China, Russia, and the U.S. (but not Israel)—the Alliance has held summits in Cairo, Riyadh, and Oslo to work on detailed plans for a new security and governance framework that would provide both Palestinians and Israelis with security and freedom. 

A January survey by Israel's Institute for National Security Studies asked about Israeli support for a "regional arrangement including a peace agreement with Saudi Arabia, building a regional coalition against Iran, and a path toward separation from the Palestinians, backed by the Trump administration and moderate Arab states." The findings were remarkable: 71% of Israelis supported the idea.  

Another poll conducted the same month by the aChord Research Institute at Hebrew University found that when given the choice between "promoting a regional political-security arrangement that includes normalisation with Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, and agreeing to establish a Palestinian state" or "promoting full annexation of the West Bank," 60% of Israelis preferred the former, while only 31% favored the latter. 

If those preferences are reflected at the ballot box, the vision of the centre-left could become the policy of the Israeli government.  

You might also like
  • Court decision fails to understand when ‘Fuk Israel’ becomes antisemitic
    Jeremie Bracka
  • The Altalena should be a warning, not a political weapon
    Shahar Burla
  • Turkey emerges as military threat to Israel
    Dror Doron
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Segalovitz Abbas
    Israel Votes 2026AnalysisIsrael

    Segalovitz decision to join Arab party is a paradigm change for Israel

    Eetta Prince-Gibson
    Ofer_Winter_2026
    Israel Votes 2026AnalysisIsrael

    Who is Ofer Winter and could he upset Netanyahu’s election?

    Shahar Burla
    Ibrahim Khatatbe
    NewsIsrael

    Abuse by IDF soldiers humiliates Muslim Palestinians

    Ben Lynfield 3

About the author

Ittay Flescher

Ittay Flescher

Ittay Flescher is the Jerusalem Correspondent for The Jewish Independent. For over twenty years, he has worked as an educator, journalist, and peacebuilder in Melbourne and Jerusalem. His book, The Holy and the Broken: A Cry for Israeli-Palestinian Peace from a Land that Must Be Shared, was longlisted for the 2025 Walkley Book Awards.

More from the author

AnalysisIsrael

What ‘Zionism’ means in Israel:  it’s not what you think

AnalysisIsrael

From haven to hotbed: how Israel’s perception of Australia has changed

FeatureIsrael

New wave of Russian-speaking migrants may be key to Israel’s future

AnalysisIsrael

How a new International Peace Fund could make a tangible difference

Comments1

  • Avatar of Rachel Sussman

    Rachel Sussman18 April at 11:32 am

    I have sincerely attempted to follow and believe in the Author’s vision but sadly, its weakness kept looking at me at every proposed stage…
    First it is suggested to implement phase 2 and 3 ‘as agreed’, but these stages were subject to coming to agreement about the day after and as it was and is – there are huge gaps between Hamas and Israel regarding the day after, and allowing this the IDF cannot leave Gaza and therefore the deal collapsed… and therefore war continue…
    As for the suggestion that the day after will include a multi national force that exclude Hamas – this will be wonderful and it will need to be agreed on and carried before the IDF evacuates Gaza not before!
    It seems that Etzion – although well meaning – is naive about Hamas and its intention… whilst Hamas indicated it is willing to ‘relunquish control’ over civillian matters, it clearly stated its expectation to ‘have a say’ and wirse still, it wants to hang on to its military powers – in other words: it wants a ‘puppet government’ and it will still hold the real power through its military…
    As Etzion said – yes, Hamas has bern weakened and this, unfortunately, occured only due to Israel’s IDF bombardment, and still, its weakness does not seem to detter it…
    As for the people of Gaza they were quick smart silenced after their attempt to arise and as long as Hamas is in Gaza, this will not change…
    Of course he is right that Israel should not overtake Gaza, we sure do not want to go backwards, what needs to happen is for the US to ‘take over’ and oversee the multi national Government and ensure that Hamas is demilitarised and out of the picture. I cannot see how the IDF can simply leave Gaza and end the war before this happens and sadly, I doubt Hamas agreeing…
    Etzion admits that his plan is subject to both sides agreeing as well as being subject to a reformed PA, but he seems to have faith in both Hamad and PA who have failed over and over in the past and are in constant conflict for power, while claiming the ‘bigger problem is on our side’. Our side has its problems for sure, but I am afraid it is far from being the bigger problem…
    I would love nothing more than to see a centre- left government replacing the current right government, but I sincerely doubt the capacity of the centre-left to see the reality and let go of the old notion of believing in the ‘good intention’ of the like of Hamas and PA. October 7 woke me – and many Israelis – up, and we are sincerely stuck – we want our hostages home, we want to end this horrid war, we want peace, but if we are honest with ourselves we will admit that, unfortunately and painful as it is, it seems that some understand only the language of power… I pray to be wrong