Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
Israel Hamas WarAnalysisAustralia

Jewish community turns inward, imprisoned between two wars

Without acknowledgement of Israel's pain, and their own, it is hard for Jews to open their hearts to Palestinian suffering.
Michael Visontay
Print this
not listening facing away

Published: 1 April 2024

Last updated: 1 April 2024

There are two wars being fought over the Middle East. One of them is on the ground in Gaza, between Israel and Hamas, with tanks, rockets and artillery. Israel is engaged in what many describe as an existential battle against an enemy determined to destroy it. This war has taken the Middle East into uncharted territory. No-one can predict which direction it will take and when it will end.

The other war being fought is in public arenas all around the world, between people expressing support and hostility on various sides of the conflict in Gaza. These combatants use words, photos, posters, physical and digital intimidation. The battles have claimed many victims on all sides, some of whom will be scarred for many years, if not life.

The second war is unprecedented in its scale and depth. Not even September 11 prompted so many proxy wars and divisiveness around the world. There have been several grave casualties of this war: one of them is the erosion of civil discussion. People find it almost impossible to discuss Israel-Hamas without flinching and walking on eggshells. Exchanges of views are seen as throwing of grenades.

One of the reasons for this is the tidal wave of hostility that has been directed towards Israel and Jews, the reflexive sympathy for Palestinians that was not balanced by any similar feelings for Israelis – from certain politicians, NGOs and progressives and the sense of entitlement shown by pro-Palestinian supporters in expressing not just solidarity, but physical intimidation of Jews and Israeli interests in Australia.

It began in the immediate aftermath of October 7 before Israel had responded to Hamas’s attacks, and in the early days of the IDF offensive in Gaza. The hatred was ignited by the march from Sydney Town Hall to the Opera House – where demonstrators, according to NSW police, chanted “where are the Jews?” not “Gas the Jews” (are the police serious?), then spread as’ ‘Freedom for Palestine banners’ quickly removed the word Hamas from public display, Jewish people and causes were singled out and cancelled, and Israeli hostages’ families ambushed.

The huge difference between the number of Australians who have engaged with this war compared with other conflicts distant from Australia, such Russia-Ukraine, Afghanistan and Iraq, Sri Lanka and the Rohingya, is a measure of the underlying hostility towards Israel and Jews within the broader community.

The intensity of the immediate post-October responses has led Australian Jews to one visceral conclusion: “they all hate us”, and that genuine discussion was pointless. It has made them reject the possibility that they could have civilised debate or disagreement with people who criticise Israel or support the Palestinian cause.

The hostility has made it virtually impossible for Jews to engage with legitimate criticism of Israel and empathy for Palestinian suffering.

For many, the eruption of hostility confirmed their pre-existing belief that criticism of Israel was antisemitism in disguise, and it also made progressive Jews doubt their political sympathies with left-leaning organisations and friends.

In turn, Jews across the social and political spectrum have turned inwards, seeking solace amongst themselves, too uncomfortable to discuss the subject with non-Jews because they are always worried that their support for the other side might disguise anti-Jewish hostility rather than considered arguments. Instead, many Jews now exchange messages of solidarity and links to podcasts that validate their own fragile feelings.

I must admit that I find it hard to criticise my fellow Jews for this behaviour. I feel the same discomfort, the same urge to turn inwards. I used to think that community leadership complaints about antisemitism were a case of crying wolf. Now I think I was wrong.

However, through not wanting to hear, through being afraid of what might be said, many of us have become deaf to views, arguments and ideas that may express legitimate criticism of Israel, or genuine support for Palestinian people, that express empathy for the mass deaths they are experiencing in Gaza, that express outrage at the Israeli army’s treatment of civilian prisons, the posting of ugly videos on Tik-Tok, the slowness in delivering aid to starving civilians, and for much more.

They have become deaf to legitimate criticism of the Israeli government’s handling of the war, of Benjamin Netanyahu’s use of war to delay his own trial for corruption, deaf to legitimate solidarity for Palestinian suffering and aspiration, to the sincerity of calls for ceasefire, even if those calling for a ceasefire don’t know how to answer the question: “and what about Hamas?”

The deafness has led to a seemingly irreconcilable dilemma: the outpouring of hostility and toxic targeting has made it virtually impossible for Jews to engage with the merits of legitimate criticism of Israel and empathy for Palestinian suffering. This perverse dynamic is probably too convoluted for most non-Jews to appreciate. But its existence leads to significant flow-ons.

First, if all criticism or support for the other side is deemed illegitimate, then unwavering support for Israel becomes a defence that requires no self-examination.

Second, it has robbed many Jews of the ability, or inclination, to confront inconvenient ideas. And there are many. One revolves around the elimination of Hamas, a bedrock issue since the start of the war. As we read about Israel targeting the Al-Shifra hospital again because Hamas has regrouped and re-entered the complex, a question looms large – if Hamas is back in numbers, how effective has the ground offensive been? Can Hamas be wiped out or only subdued? And what of the hostages, of whom only a couple have been rescued? Does any or all of this call for a rethinking of strategy?

Jews are craving acknowledgement from non-Jews of the legitimacy of their anxiety.

Another question relates to aid. The UN and other NGOs are invoking the spectre of famine in north Gaza, a prospect that must surely sicken every decent-minded person, no matter how staunch their support of Israel. If the military campaign results in famine, then it is time to ask whether Israel must do more to avert such a catastrophe.

The person who is central to all these challenges is Benjamin Netanyahu and it feels like many in the Jewish community are taking their lead from him: focus on one outcome and ignore collateral suffering.

In this context, the recent campaign in Sydney to target Federal MP Allegra Spender over her signing of a letter supporting Australia’s re-engagement with UNWRA was symptomatic of the mindset. Spender has been one of Australia’s most outspoken defenders of Jews. The fact that certain community figures could not accept her having sympathy for Palestinians as well as Israelis says a lot about the mentality that has taken hold.

The circuit-breaker to this inward spiral is acknowledgement. Jews are craving acknowledgement from their non-Jewish friends of their anxiety, its causes and its legitimacy. If they spell this out and see that it has been received, then two crucial paths open up:

First, a bedrock of understanding be laid down, which will help neutralise anger and mistrust - an essential pre-condition for civilised exchange.

Second, Jews can then open their own hearts and minds to views that differ from theirs, whether they are couched in criticism of Israel or sympathy for Palestinians.

These conflicts are not going away soon. The residue will be deep and long-lasting. In one sense, the equation is obvious. Israelis are suffering, Jews are suffering and Palestinians are suffering. Mutual acknowledgement is the starting point to recognising the suffering of others. The first steps are fraught but what is the alternative? Locking ourselves in a psychological silo, where no-one else will be there to listen. That is a recipe for perennial victimhood. 

You might also like
  • Fighting for a better Israel 
    Peter Kohn
  • Record spike in settler violence ahead of election
    Ben Lynfield
  • Your Israel election cheat sheet
    Deborah Stone
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Isabelle oderberg
    NewsAustralia

    ‘The Jewish Independent’ commentary makes finals in Walkley journalism awards

    The Jewish Independent 1
    Online hate
    AnalysisAustralia

    Social media regulation is a necessary brake on harmful speech

    Dean Sherr 1
    csg security
    FeatureAustralia

    When security clashes with hospitality

    Jarod Rhine-Davis

About the author

Michael Visontay

More from the author

NewsAustralia

Matt Chun’s hate speech prompts change in arts funding policy

AnalysisAustralia

Mishandled antisemitism education is not just ineffective, it’s dangerous

FeatureLifestyle

Where Shtisel meets The Jetsons

ReviewIsrael

Beinart’s utopian vision ignores awkward truths