Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, Listen
Feature

‘Affordability is a big challenge; parents want excellence too, but not just results’

Michael Visontay
Print this

Published: 6 May 2022

Last updated: 4 March 2024

David Gonski’s review of Sydney Jewish schools aims to somehow make them affordable, deliver better results, more diversity - and utilise their Talmudic wisdom

IN THE MIDDLE of our interview about the future of Jewish education, David Gonski, chair of the committee that spent a year trying to find solutions for the challenges facing Sydney Jewish day schools, shares a startling number.

312,000.

“$312,000 or above is the uppermost data income band [in the Australian Bureau of Statistics]. The Education Review Committee (ERC) has calculated that anything lower than this, for families with two or more students, for which school fees are being paid, would have an affordability challenge, unless other sources to fund all or part of the school fees are available to them,” the report by the ERC said when it was published in March.

It is a number that encapsulates the challenges facing not only Jewish parents but all parents across Australia as they decide what sort of education they want for their children.  

For Jewish parents, the choices revolve around a Jewish day school (43% of all Jewish school children), another private school, or public schools. The nub of the problem, according to the report, is that the average Jewish day school fee per child is $22,000 per year.

For two-parent families, 20% in Eastern Suburbs North (Waverley and Woollahra municipalities) earn $312k+; 13% in Eastern Suburbs South (Randwick, Maroubra, Botany) are in this bracket, and 14% in Ku-ring-ai (in the North shore). For one-parent families, two per cent of those in ESN are in this band.

The Committee calculated that anything lower than the income band of $312,000 a year, for families with two or more students, for which fees are being paid, would have an affordability challenge.

Everyone whose household income is below this level would struggle, without discount or help (the review notes that an increasing number of grandparents are now paying for their grandchildren’s Jewish school fees).

“There is the popular myth that the Jewish community is rich,” Gonski says. There is no doubt there are some members of the Jewish community that are rich, but there is no doubt that there are many members of the Jewish community who are not so uniformly affluent.

“The Jewish community has its wonderful achievers, but some of those achievers have not made a lot of money.”

It is the gap, ever rising, between the level of income needed and the cost of fees for those living in in Sydney’s exploding housing market, that is at the heart of the review that Gonski steered. Few would be better qualified to execute that task; Gonski chaired the landmark review into Australian school funding that came to bear his name.

For this review, the Committee’s remit was very specific: “to impartially assess and identify holistic opportunities and determine solutions for the Jewish day school system to assist in facing the coming decades,” its report stated. Specifically, that refers to five schools: Emanuel School, Kesser Torah College, Masada College, Moriah College and Mount Sinai College.

As Gonski explained it to me: “What we're trying to do in this report is to extol the virtues of the Jewish Day School and to try to alleviate some of the affordability and other problems that we have identified.”

Although Gonski stressed that his remit was not focussed on Jewish education beyond the Jewish day schools, he spoke frankly about its role within the broader debate.

The review notes that an increasing number of grandparents are now paying for their grandchildren’s Jewish school fees.

Of the 2000-plus parents who were interviewed for the review, he said there were many who weighed up the value proposition of paying fees for a Jewish primary school versus choosing a public primary school. “We do away with a holiday we can't have because it's going to cost us $18,000 a year; two kids makes $36,000 a year after tax; $70,000 before tax. We could go to Europe, give the kids a rich experience.

“And by the way, Bellevue Hill Public is over 50% Jewish anyway.”

But is he saying that affordability and house prices are the only reason that primary-age children are drifting towards non-Jewish day schools?

“I’m not saying it’s the only reason, and it’s not the primary reason. I’m saying there’s a whole lot of reasons. And I would fight for those reasons. They are your children, you are entitled to send them wherever you wish.

“There should not be a law saying what school they go to but certainly affordability is a big reason. No doubt about it. You don’t need to interview more people. Everybody says that. By the way, the rich they don't worry so much, but they do notice. The poor are very worried. They just don't have the money.

What about the desire by parents for a different type of Jewish education, a less insular one that is set within a broader social and ethnic diversity? Gonski will not be drawn on whether this is a factor. “I think, as I said, everybody makes their own decisions. For example, some parents would not send their kid to a single sex school. So I think it is a choice.

But the combination of having a good local school, with “quite a lot of Jewish kids and the add on of a slice of Jewish teaching through BJE (NSW Board of Jewish Education)” can often make parents question the value of a Jewish primary school.

While this equation was one issue, Gonski said the burden imposed by the sheer size of fees has been compounded by a concern, at high school level, about another value proposition: the educational offering and academic excellence delivered by Jewish day schools. While their counterparts in Melbourne are right at the top of the lists, Gonski said the same cannot be said for those in Sydney, despite their reputations.

“In our report, parents are saying they want excellence.”

That doesn’t just mean results, says Gonski. “I think parents are very very aware of the concept of ATAR (final year results). But many of the parents also want a bigger, more diverse offering. They don't want just little Johnny to come top of Hebrew. They want him to do higher maths and so on, and that often is quite difficult.

Gonski made it clear that there is pressure on the Jewish day schools to both improve their ATAR results and also market better their non-tangible educational assets.

At the high school level, this has brought into play the pull of other private schools that offer academic excellence, and other educational benefits. Although he stopped short of naming those schools, Gonski made it clear that there is pressure on the Jewish day schools to both improve their ATAR results and also market better their non-tangible educational assets.

And that is not code, he stresses, for “networking”.

No, Gonski is talking here about something grounded within Jewish cultural history.

“Geoff Levy was my business partner for many years. He is a scholar of the Talmud. Some of the things he taught me were really useful: the idea you should give away 10% of your money – but not more than 20%. I never knew that. And what great foresight to think about how you shouldn't become a burden on the state.

“These are ideas we should be cultivating. Some of the Jewish schools are doing this. It’s Hebrew philosophy. We've actually told the schools to get together and start to cultivate this sort of thing.

“Going into a Jewish school is good because you meet other Jews, and that's fantastic. But you can do that at Bellevue Hill primary, and Rose Bay secondary. But they just can't do Hebrew philosophy. They can have all the BJE people coming in to teach but it won't be the same.”

To address questions of affordability and excellence, the review has proposed six big ideas: centralised fee assistance; a centre for education excellence for teacher development; a group to investigate opportunities for shared resourcing; a school grants program; a scorecard for Jewish day schools; and a Jewish "education alliance" to promote greater coordination between schools and all Jewish education providers.

Among these, the one that is bound to cause most debate is the idea of scorecards. These have not been welcomed universally in the general community, and Gonski accepts they may also be contentious among Jewish schools, and parents.

“If you’re a school, the first thing you say to yourself is, ‘oh, no, I don't want that’. But when a parent makes the decision to send their Josh or Joanna to Moriah, what are the things they look at? First, their ATAR results? Second, Jewish tradition. Third, maybe Jewish kids.

“But there's a lot more to these schools than that. A scorecard can instantly start to elevate some of the other things they do that are invisible to you. Sporting teams and the number of competitions, and other non-academic activities. Our idea was that not only should the scorecard elevate those within the school, which is what everybody's obviously scared of.

“But it could also push up the whole school system. And we think it's a great idea. And yes, I did have a whole lot of management consultants on the board, but I'm convinced they were right.”

Gonski said the committee deliberately did not specify a template or what should go on the scorecard because everyone would argue their guidelines. “We want them to say that this a great concept. We're not telling them what they should put in it.”

Does he have a sense of whether it's been embraced? “I think it's too early to know.”

With his experience in the national educational review, David Gonski knows that creating systemic change in schools is a slow and complex beast.

READ MORE
NSW Jewish education review proposes six ‘big ideas’ for the future
(The Jewish Independent)

JULIE SZEGO: NSW Jewish education report suffers from insular focus on Jewish schools (The Jewish Independent)

Photo: David Gonski speaks during the announcement of the 2021 Archibald Prize winner at the Art Gallery of NSW in Sydney, June 2021 (AAP/Bianca De Marchi)

You might also like
  • Synagogue and Jewish-owned shops damaged in French riots
    Ilan Bloom
  • When security clashes with hospitality
    Jarod Rhine-Davis
  • NDIS changes threaten disabled participation in community life
    Jarod Rhine-Davis
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    tame kostakidis west
    AnalysisAustralia

    How not to apologise

    Zac Klugman
    Web Banner – Andrew Casey Internship

    Andrew Casey Memorial Internship Program

    Paul Amato
    Jewish-diversity copy
    Feature

    The three questions that will define the Jewish future

    Shahar Burla 1

About the author

Michael Visontay

More from the author

NewsAustralia

Matt Chun’s hate speech prompts change in arts funding policy

AnalysisAustralia

Mishandled antisemitism education is not just ineffective, it’s dangerous

FeatureLifestyle

Where Shtisel meets The Jetsons

ReviewIsrael

Beinart’s utopian vision ignores awkward truths