Aa

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

An open letter to Louise Adler

Strident anti-Zionist views may owe more to a refusal to hear divergent narratives than to claimed humanitarianism.
Fiona Kelmann
Print this
Copy of Copy of Quarterly books template (1)

Illustration: TJI

Published: 23 September 2024

Last updated: 23 September 2024

I read your opinion piece (21/09) with an open heart and mind. I was originally quite captivated by the headline and excited to read on.

In your opening argument you insisted that concern for the ‘other’ should be premised on shared humanity, rather than a specific Jewish experience. Nevertheless, you went on to share your family’s Jewish history. You wrote that your parents narrowly escaped the clutches of Nazism, fleeing Germany in 1938 for Australia. How lucky they were to secure refuge despite an extremely restrictive immigration policy in Australia. Your grandfather, as a teenager, was a member of the French resistance. Sadly, he was murdered in Birkenau.

That history resonated with me, as a Jew and also a descendant of Holocaust survivors. My grandmother too engaged in resistance during the war. She trained and fought in the Zhukov unit of the Russian Partisans. Almost my entire family, bar my grandparents, were murdered in the Treblinka death camp. And I too, like you, have great affinity for asylum seekers. In fact, after surviving the Holocaust, my own grandparents languished in DP camps for five years. My mother was born in a DP camp in Germany.

You went on to affirm once again, that your father’s decision ‘to take a stand‘ derived from his own father’s experience and horrors of war since then. You wrote that these same experiences contributed to your own ‘understanding’ of the world. I have to confess feeling a little confused as to how this accorded with your thesis that empathy for others should foremost be predicated on shared humanity. Incidentally, I don’t have an issue acknowledging one’s lived experience or the concept of shared humanity to support human rights. In fact, I see these two factors as complimentary to one another.

I too call for a ceasefire in Gaza, but also, unlike you, I call for a return of the innocent Israeli hostages, and condemn the massacre of October 7 by Hamas.

Your reference to your past involvement with a socialist Zionist youth movement interested me a lot, even if I didn’t understand why you were still talking about yourself. I too attended a socialist Zionist youth movement. However, unlike you, I went of my own volition. I did wonder why, if your parents were not Zionists, they did not encourage you to attend a non-Zionist Jewish socialist youth movement? Another disturbing difference became apparent to me. Unlike you, my political views were not passed down to me by my parents. I must confess, at this stage, the sting was leaving your article.

A summer trip, sponsored by your non-Zionist parents I presume, appears to have been a major factor in forming your views on Israel, aged 18. I am not sure if that 1972 trip was the last time you visited Israel or not? I also went to Israel after high school (and have been there multiple times since, including two sabbaticals) but, unlike you, I went for a year. On kibbutz I did not pluck any turkeys or pick oranges, as your parents feared you would. However, I did pick bananas, helped birth a calf, worked with Ethiopian immigrants, studied Zionist and non-Zionist thinkers, went to the Occupied Territories, and attended multiple seminars alongside Palestinians and Israelis with the ‘Peace Now’ movement.

Perhaps our difference in age accounts for these divergent experiences. I never racially profiled the airport personnel like you did. I never thought of the chain smoking, hairy chested passport control officers as European Jews, as you did. On Kibbutz, we did not have Palestinians cleaning our toilets (sadly we cleaned our own) and we had Mizrachi (Middle Eastern Jews) as members of the Kibbutz.

Despite the outbreak of the first Intifada, I spent hours in the Arab souk sipping tea served to me by Palestinian shopkeepers and chatted to them about their hopes and dreams. Certainly, there was entrenched racism in Israeli society, as there was in Australia, and still is. In fact, when you left for your sojourn in Israel, the White Australia Policy was still in existence. It formally ended in 1973.

We are all victims of our own pasts. The challenge is to transcend and look beyond ourselves.

I have not read Saree Makdisi but I know enough about politics, law and government to know that the ideas of Israel and democracy do not contradict one another. Israel was Terra Nullius? Louise, you may not be a Zionist, which is a vulnerable place to come from when discussing Israel with Jewish people. I accept that. However, to deny the long historical, spiritual and cultural connection of Israel to the Jewish people is factually incorrect, and unfortunately, deprives your argument of any merit.

I read on but your arguments became so polarised that I decided not to dissect them in detail any further. Save to say, my heart too breaks for what is occurring in Gaza. Your conflation of the Warsaw Ghetto and Gaza is not the first but does not mean it is not a distortion of the Holocaust. I too call for a ceasefire in Gaza, but also, unlike you, I call for a return of the innocent Israeli hostages, and condemn the massacre of October 7 by Hamas, a proscribed terror organisation. I call for enactment of the principles enshrined in the Israeli Declaration of Independence:

The state of Israel will promote the development of the country for the benefit of all its inhabitants; will be based on precepts of liberty, justice and peace taught by the Hebrew prophets; will uphold the full social and political equality of all its citizens without distinction of race, creed or sex. 

Louise, is it possible at all, that some of your thinking may have come about, not because of your humanitarian stance, but, rather, because of your early views which have remained largely unaltered, and closed to divergent narratives? I cannot help but wonder what your views may have been if your Jewish family were denied refuge in Australia, as most were, and instead granted asylum in Israel?

All I know is that if we truly want peace between Palestinians and Israelis, we are going to need to acknowledge for once and for all, that no one is going anywhere. Palestinians deserve rights. Israelis deserve rights.

We are all victims of our own pasts. The challenge is to transcend and look beyond ourselves. I have an arts degree, a law degree and a postgraduate degree in human rights law. But the best piece of learning I ever gained was one word. I learned this word in, of all places, the Zionist socialist movement on my gap year in Israel on a Kibbutz in 1987.

The word is ‘moratorium’. Suspend all previous beliefs. Listen. Learn. Relearn.

Feel free to write back if you wish to discuss this further.

Sincerely,
Fiona Kelmann

About the author

Fiona Kelmann

Fiona Kelmann is a Melbourne writer and researcher.

Comments23

  • Avatar of Etty Rosenblum

    Etty Rosenblum26 September at 08:49 am

    Thank you for your clear and thought out response Fiona.

  • Avatar of Liana Levin

    Liana Levin26 September at 03:40 am

    You say ‘Moratorium’, I say Rumi, the 12th century Islamic Scholar who’s famous quote poetically resonates your point. “Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing, There is a field. I’ll meet you there. “

  • Avatar of Sharon Stern

    Sharon Stern25 September at 08:40 pm

    I would also like to get this out to a wider, non-Jewish audience. I don’t think that Louise’s opinion should remain unchallenged and your piece highlights the rigidity in her thinking

  • Avatar of Deb Gem

    Deb Gem25 September at 10:52 am

    You reflected my thoughts. With Louise it’s always about Louise

  • Avatar of Julie Gelman

    Julie Gelman24 September at 09:09 am

    Re indigeneity and terra nullius just wondering if L Adler has ever wondered why Jesus was born in Bethlehem?

  • Avatar of Dr Tanya Anne Serry

    Dr Tanya Anne Serry24 September at 08:05 am

    Thank you for this clear response and appropriate questions you pose.

  • Avatar of Melissa o

    Melissa o24 September at 07:53 am

    Fabulous piece of writing Fiona 👏🏻👏🏻
    Reading louise’ article was disturbing, this is such an articulate response

  • Avatar of Ivan

    Ivan24 September at 07:37 am

    Excellent article, Fiona.

    Well done.

  • Avatar of Jack Chrapot

    Jack Chrapot24 September at 07:37 am

    Louise Adler maintains that Zionism’s “advocates set aside the fact that a Jewish state would entail the denial of an Indigenous population.”

    This proposition is hard to accept from someone who claims to –

    (a) have spent her teenage years as member of a socialist Zionist youth group, and

    (b) believe in the importance of asking questions.

    Like Adler, I spent my teenage years in Melbourne as a member of a Socialist Zionist youth group. Its most prominent thinker on Jewish-Arab relations was A. D. Gordon who wrote in Mibachutz:

    “Our relations to the Arabs must rest on cosmic foundations. Our attitude toward them must be one of humanity, of moral courage which remains on the highest plane, even if the behavior of the other side is not all that is desired. Indeed, their hostility is all the more a reason for our humanity.”

    Even the right-wing revisionist Zionist Ze’ev Jabotinsky declared that in the Jewish state, Arabs would be on an equal footing with their Jewish counterparts “throughout all sectors of the country’s public life.” The two communities would share the state’s duties, both military and civil service, and enjoy its prerogatives. He proposed that Hebrew and Arabic should enjoy equal status, and that “in every cabinet where the prime minister is a Jew, the vice-premiership shall be offered to an Arab and vice versa.”

    This makes me wonder what questions, if any, the teenage Adler asked on those Sunday afternoons at the youth group.

  • Avatar of Damon

    Damon24 September at 06:55 am

    Brilliantly written and explained how most Jews feel. Thank you.

  • Avatar of Sandy Benjamin

    Sandy Benjamin24 September at 06:46 am

    Thank you for sharing the refinement of your thinking. Most importantly, thank you for introducing the concept of changing one’s mind and position after listening and learning from others

  • Avatar of Sara Vidal

    Sara Vidal24 September at 05:52 am

    Brilliant. I admire your measured tone and clarity. Inspirational. Love your response to go viral.

  • Avatar of Petra

    Petra24 September at 01:18 am

    Thank you for your reasoned response.

  • Avatar of Pauline Grodski

    Pauline Grodski24 September at 12:27 am

    I fully endorse Nina Bassat’s comment. It expresses my sentiments perfectly. Well done Fiona.

  • Avatar of Suzanne Wolf

    Suzanne Wolf24 September at 12:05 am

    Thank you Fiona. Your article demonstrates that you are a caring and thoughtful person and that you have maintained your interest in the word ‘moratorium’, and have not become fixated on a particular hateful position.

  • Avatar of Kirsten Barouch

    Kirsten Barouch23 September at 10:16 pm

    Thank you for posting such an insightful reply. Do you think that Israel’s neighbours are anywhere near ready to make peace with Israel?That in my humble opinion is the crux of the matter.

  • Avatar of Rita Erlich

    Rita Erlich23 September at 09:29 pm

    A thoughtful and beautifully argued piece. I hope Louise Adler reads it and understands it.

  • Avatar of Caroline Troski

    Caroline Troski23 September at 08:50 pm

    Thank you for highlighting the problems with Louise Adler’s statements and views

  • Avatar of Elana Roseth

    Elana Roseth23 September at 08:34 pm

    How do we get this brilliant piece out to a wider, mon Jewish audience?

  • Avatar of Kate Gruwell

    Kate Gruwell23 September at 02:49 pm

    The history of secular Zionism gaining . military might has a very recent history. I don’t understand the seriousness you grant it.
    In response to the emergence of political Zionism as an “international nationalism” towards the end of the 19th century, an inter- and transnational front that rejected Zionism also emerged in European Judaism. Within liberal and Orthodox Judaism in particular, the reservations regarding this new movement were so grave that organizations came into being, the main aim of which was to oppose Zionism. While the anti-Zionism of liberal Jews was primarily based on the fear that Jewish nationalism might endanger integration into non-Jewish society and give new momentum to anti-Semitism, anti-Zionist Orthodox Jews usually rejected Zionism not only because of the secularist trend at its core, but also because it was an attempt to bring about the messianic age by human intervention.

  • Avatar of Sara Vidal

    Sara Vidal23 September at 12:57 pm

    Excellent, thanks Fiona.

  • Avatar of Greta Gertler Gold

    Greta Gertler Gold23 September at 12:36 pm

    Thank you. This is a brilliant response.

  • Avatar of Nina Bassat

    Nina Bassat23 September at 10:01 am

    What an articulate, reasoned, well informed response. A great contrast to the “As a Jew” opinion piece, with its uninformed, platitudinous and non-realistic approach. Thank you for your clear and sound comments.

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

Enter site