Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenIsrael
AnalysisIsrael

Government threatens Israeli cinema institute over films critical of IDF

In a new attempt to suppress dissent, Israel's Coalition is threatening to withhold funding from Tel Aviv Cinematheque.
Ben Lynfield
Print this
1948-film-censorship copy

Published: 17 December 2024

Last updated: 17 December 2024

A threat by the government to cut funding to a leading film institution is intensifying concerns over harm to the country’s cultural fabric by the most far-right government in Israel’s history.

The attack on the Tel Aviv Cinameteque for hosting a human rights film festival stands out as one of the more audacious and damaging moves during the morphing of Israel into a more authoritarian country underway since the Netanyahu government was elected two years ago.

In a letter to finance minister Bezalel Smotrich, Culture Minister Miki Zohar wrote that the Tel Aviv Cinameteque’s “Solidarity Festival” which ran from December 5-10, had shown films that “are against the state of Israel” and which “disparage the soldiers of the Israel Defense Force.” Zohar expects Smotrich to determine whether the festival violated funding laws.

Screening such films in an institution funded by the government “is problematic and deviates from legitimate and reasonable freedom of expression,” Zohar wrote. It was the first government step against the festival since it was established in 2011.

The coalition, dominated by ultranationalist and anti-Arab politicians, argues it is making Israel more democratic by acting in accordance with the will of the majority that elected it. It depicts its targets as elitists bent on preserving their privileges and power at the expense of the nation.

However, during Israel’s ongoing state of war, the coalition is pushing a flurry of antidemocratic bills, including one designed to restrict academic speech ostensibly for security reasons, and another that would effectively impinge on voting among Palestinian citizens of Israel and decrease their Knesset representation, thereby perpetuating the rule of the hard Right.

In film, the government’s threatening posture towards work raising questions about Israel’s foundation, or probing Palestinian dispossession or alleged army violations is already deterring filmmakers and supervisors from choosing critical or controversial topics. The reason is simple: in Israel the government, not private investors, provides the funding for films.

Neta Shoshani
Neta Shoshani

Clearly people exercise self-censorship even though they don’t admit it.

Neta Shoshani

“When they threaten, you don’t feel like taking a chance,” said filmmaker Neta Shoshani, who has run into censorship issues over her film 1948: Remember, Remember Not, that was screened at the Jerusalem Cinameteque in November. “There is a chilling effect,” she told The Jewish Independent.

“This means that culture in Israel is rapidly becoming non-critical and doesn’t go to [controversial] places simply because there is no one to fund this type of film. If I enter controversial realms, I won’t get funding and at the end of the day, we all have to make a living. So clearly people exercise self-censorship even though they don’t admit it.”

“This is something that happens under every dictatorial regime,” Shoshani added. “In a fascist regime, culture becomes propaganda and not culture. Gradually, Israeli culture is becoming like that.”

Zohar’s office said in response: “we will continue to defend freedom of expression but we won’t let extremist and delusional elements incite and harm under the sponsorship of the state of Israel.”

The Cinameteque management has stressed that the ministry’s legal adviser had opposed the idea of stopping funding of the institution in retaliation for the content of the festival. But Zohar disregarded this advice.

The threat against the Tel Aviv Cinameteque, comes three months after the government started deploying a long-dormant 1927 British Mandate regulation to enable it to cancel, discourage or at least delay the screening of three films, two of them dealing with what Israelis know as the War of Independence, and Palestinians, the nakba, or catastrophe.

According to the regulation, films screened at cinameteques need to be greenlighted by a cinema board within the culture ministry. The board previously focused primarily on setting the age for a movie’s viewership.

According to Haaretz, now the board is requiring all Cinameteque directors to clear films with it.

Solidarity Festival organisers had posted that its films “strive to advance peace, democracy and human rights alongside equality and social justice”. The screenings included a panel discussion organised by the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, Israel’s oldest human rights group, on threats to media freedom in the country. 

It featured Noa Landau, an editor at Haaretz, itself the victim of government financial pressure largely because of its coverage of the Gaza war.

Shamai Glick, who heads the right-wing B’tsalmo organization, which often provides Zohar, the police, and other figures with information and complaints prompting them to ban films, plays or events often on the grounds that they defame the state or army, told TJI that his group triggered Zohar’s move.

“I call their festival the solidarity with Hamas festival,” Glick said, taking issue among other things with the festival’s giving space to the B’tselem human rights group and to conscientious objectors from army service.

The mainstream rarely reacts when a Palestinian is under fire.

Palestinian director Rami Younis
The Jewish Independent

Glick also sharply criticised the festival for screening the film Lyd, which depicts the 1948 expulsion of that town’s Palestinians and looting and an alleged massacre by IDF troops. The film imagines what Lyd would be like if not for the nakba. In October police banned a screening of Lyd in Jaffa after Zohar charged the movie was “inciting and mendacious”, funded by BDS activists and “slanders Israel and Israeli soldiers”.

Lyd co-director Rami Younis, who grew up in the city, told TJI that he has had censorship problems for years, but “the mainstream rarely reacts when a Palestinian is under fire. They don’t understand that it’s a matter of time before they come after them too. And now they are coming after them.”

In his case, he said the ban had only helped him by drawing publicity and opportunities to screen the film in the United States. Younis dismissed the allegation of BDS funding as a "fabrication", saying the film was sponsored by the New York State Council for the Arts, philanthropists, and the Harvard University Divinity School.

Younis linked suppression of films dealing with the nakba to what he said is another one being carried out by Israel in Gaza, where the IDF has expelled much of the population of north Gaza and destroyed their homes during the last two months in what it says is an operation against Hamas.

Over the course of the war, triggered by a brutal Hamas massacre on Israeli border communities, the army has forced most Gazans into “safe zones” that are not safe. “If you don’t recognise the crime the first time, and it goes unaccounted for, you are going to keep repeating that crime,” Younis said, noting that Israeli agriculture minister Avi Dichter, a member of the security cabinet, had termed the military operation “the Gaza nakba”.

Shoshani’s film lost several screenings after the film board said it needed to be assessed, but ultimately approved it. The film is compelling and thought-provoking, looking at the War of Independence/Nakba through testimonies and interviews with Israelis and Palestinians about the same events.

It also shines a light on how even after all these years, the Israeli state is censoring key documentation from researchers. The Kan public broadcaster, which had funded the film, has been declining to screen it for 18 months, or to confirm when it will be shown. Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi has pressed for it to be scrapped, Shoshani said.

Despite the risks, Shoshani says now is the time for critical filmmaking. “It doesn’t look like there will be a chance to do that later. It doesn’t look like things will change.”

You might also like
  • Abuse by IDF soldiers humiliates Muslim Palestinians
    Ben Lynfield
  • Beinart takes a wrecking ball to Israel
    Michael Visontay
  • Zomi investigation delivers new low in Australia-Israel relations
    Michael Visontay
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Marwan Barghouti demonstration
    Israel Hamas WarAnalysisIsrael

    Palestinians disillusioned with Hamas and armed struggle: new survey

    Shahar Burla
    Protest government election
    Israel Votes 2026FeatureIsrael

    ‘Elections are not a civil war’: the democracy threats worrying Israelis

    Shahar Burla 1
    Palestinians Inspect Fire-Damaged Home Following Settler Attack Near Nablus
    OpinionIsrael

    The West Bank After Tel: a line in the sand has been crossed

    Mohammad Asideh

About the author

Ben Lynfield

Ben Lynfield

Ben Lynfield covered Israeli and Palestinian politics for The Independent and served as Middle Eastern affairs correspondent at The Jerusalem Post. He writes for publications in the region and has contributed to the Christian Science Monitor, Foreign Policy and the New Statesman.

More from the author

NewsIsrael

Abuse by IDF soldiers humiliates Muslim Palestinians

OpinionIsrael

Qusra siege exposes shared agenda of IDF and settler extremists

AnalysisIsrael

IDF ordered to evict West Bank camp in election show of strength

FeatureIsrael

Abuse of Palestinian detainees a ‘systemic issue’, say Israeli doctors

Comments1

  • Avatar of Ian Light

    Ian Light17 December at 07:06 am

    After the November 29 1947 Partition Plan was voted in by the United Nations a siege on the Jewish Section of the International Jerusalem was imposed by Palestinian militias . At first the Jewish Defenders were not so upset they believed International United Nation Forces led by the USA would arrive to break the blockade and help stabilise the Partition . This did not happen . Their could be hundreds of thousands of United States ,British ,French and British Forces in defeated Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan but not ten thousand well armed USA and British Dominion led Forces with armoured vehicles and airpower to prevent the war in Israel -Palestine . The Jews and Arabs would have to fight it out with tens of thousands deaths ,severe injuries the sporadic atrocities massacres and mass displacements till one group Surrendered