Published: 28 March 2024
Last updated: 28 March 2024
The slogan on posters, news channels and phone apps that “together we will be victorious” implies that in today’s Israel, dissent is disloyalty.
But Avi Dabush, Executive Director of Rabbis for Human Rights (RHR), is not conforming. He and RHR are out on a limb in the charged aftermath of the October 7 Hamas massacre and at the height of the Gaza war. They are calling for an immediate ceasefire as a first step toward peace negotiations to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
“I don’t see how more bloodshed and certainly killing of civilians will bring us to peace and reconciliation,” Dabush said last week during an interview with The Jewish Independent.
“The right thing is to give rights to the Palestinian people, stop human rights violations, struggle against Jewish terrorism in the West Bank, avoid harming civilians in Gaza and reach an agreement, at the moment a specific one to return the hostages and achieve a ceasefire, and [later] also a [full] agreement with the Palestinians.”
Dabush sees this as being reached with the Palestinian Authority but also having a regional dimension that involves Arab states.
Dabush is visiting Australia next month in a trip sponsored by the New Israel Fund, a key supporter of human rights and civil society organisations that includes Rabbis for Human Rights and a swathe of other groups it sees as fostering a more democratic and progressive Israel while working against occupation abuses in the West Bank.
RHR is an Israeli organisation, founded in 1988, that brings together about a hundred rabbis, cantors and seminary students under the ethos that all humans are created in God's image. Its members and activists come from all streams of Judaism.






Comments1
Wesley Parish28 March at 09:45 am
It’s worth reminding ourselves of a satirical comment of the PLO in one of their Beirut books, about Sammy Davis Jnr, Zionism’s claims about Jewish connection to the Land, and its bearing on Sammy Davis Jnr. If I can remember it correctly, it was along the lines of “an American entertainer, converting to Judaism, will, according to the Zionist argument (as espoused by one of the people in this article) suddenly find in himself an attachment to a land he has never seen”. So much for the claim that the Torah establishes that the Jewish people’s claim to the land is absolute. According to the Torah, that claim can be voided by unethical acts. And according to the Nevi’im, one King Saul had his sons killed en masse to avenge his slaughter of the Gibeonim, a people in a treaty relationship with the Hebrew tribal confederacy. It must be a paart of the Tenakh the far-right settlers don’t read.