Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
OpinionAustralia

Confronting Richard Flanagan and the myth of the Israel lobby

Repeated often enough, the accusation that the Israeli lobby wields undue influence has become dangerous group think
Mary Garden
Print this
Lobby

(Image: TJI)

Published: 10 September 2026

Last updated: 10 September 2026

Booker-Prize-winning author and journalist Richard Flanagan recently claimed that Israel tries to keep the world ignorant of “the orgy of evil” it has visited upon the Palestinian people. In a searing speech at Sydney’s Festival of Dangerous Ideas held on August 22, he said that one way it does that is by trying to silence us with the “deadliest slur” of antisemitism.  

He described the politicisation and weaponisation of the Bondi massacre as a “foreign influence operation” led by what he and others call “the Israel lobby”, and asked: 

“To what extent has the Israel lobby itself contributed to antisemitism in Australia by consistently advocating for Israel’s war in Gaza in a highly aggressive fashion … could it have been the lobby’s own acts fuelling antisemitism?” 

He even denies that antisemitism was present at Bondi. “Where was the antisemitism to be found at Bondi on that terrible day? Nowhere, nowhere, nowhere.” 

In his speech, Flanagan uses the word “lobby” 19 times. 

Lobby. Lobby. Lobby. The Israel lobby. 

I am sick of these words. “The Israel lobby” gets in my craw. I keep seeing it in essays, books, interviews and speeches. It reverberates and echoes across social media. 

Flanagan names three groups as part of the “Israel lobby”: the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council, the Zionist Federation of Australia, and the Executive Council of Australian Jewry. 

These are organisations that lobby and campaign, and the public has every right to criticise and scrutinise them. But to describe these different organisations as a single “lobby” raises an obvious question: how are they coordinated? Also, who runs it? Who makes the decisions? At what point did three separate organisations become one thing called “the Israel lobby”? And who else is in it? The Israeli government? Jewish community organisations? Any Australian citizen who supports Israel? Without these answers, “the Israel lobby” becomes an invisible ghost. One giant, monstrous lobby. 

Steve Biddulph, psychologist, educator and bestselling parenting author, praised Flanagan’s speech on Facebook, declaring that Flanagan confronts the evil – including the “myth” of Australian antisemitism – and that there was not a word in the speech he disagreed with. “Wow. Every second is worth hearing. Well-done RF.” 

When I challenged Biddulph about “the myth of antisemitism”, he replied: “you're right, I have modified it to the myths around antisemitism. I was being unclear.” His post now reads “myths around antisemitism.”

In a comment, Paul Arnott, a former executive director of the Christian Ministry Advancement’s Q4: Rethinking Retirement, agreed, saying that Flanagan’s speech was “a timely warning that our freedom of speech in Australia is under grave threat because of the very political pro-Israel Lobby group.” He continued: “The greatest myth perpetuated by the lobby, the greatest lie, is that criticism of the state of Israel is antisemitic.” 

I asked him: “What lobby? What is its name? Where is its base? How is it organised?” 

He replied: “The pro-Israel lobby is a network of political groups and individuals – led by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) – that works to secure strong military, financial, and diplomatic support for Israel from Western governments. It is extremely influential and asserts that any criticism of the Israeli state is antisemitic.” 

But here again, a specific organisation – AIPAC – is offered as evidence for a much broader and largely undefined entity.  

This is not a new concern. Writing for ABC Religion & Ethics in 2017, researcher Julie Nathan argued that the notion of “a powerful and sinister” Jewish lobby buying, unduly influencing or manipulating decisions is a recurring theme in antisemitic discourse. She noted that the “Jewish lobby” idea did not reference any particular organisation or individual, but referred to the notion of shadowy, undefined Jewish sources exerting influence over public life. She points out that it is irrelevant whether the term used is “Jewish lobby”, “Israel lobby” or “Zionist lobby”. 

John Lyons, an acclaimed journalist and former Global Affairs Editor at the ABC, has been making the same argument for years, and has described the Australian pro-Israel lobby as “formidable, well-funded, and effective”. 

In his 2021 book Dateline Jerusalem: Journalism’s Toughest Assignment, Lyons singles out one specific organisation: the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC). He claims that the AIJAC is “a lobby group so influential it can force changes to government policy, hound journalists out of their jobs and pressure the ABC board to justify the appointment of foreign correspondents”. 

What evidence is there that AIJAC can actually exercise that degree of control? And how does one identifiable lobby group become “the Israel lobby”? Kim Wingerei’s review of Lyons’s book is tellingly titled “Crossword clues and bullying: the almighty power of the Australian pro-Israel lobby”. The almighty power! 

Flanagan, Lyons and others give the “Israel lobby” enormous power. They say it influences government, the media, universities and cultural institutions. It influences public debate and threatens free speech. It seeks to silence critics of Israel. 

Once you construct this supposedly all-powerful actor, you can blame it for anything. If a university changes its rules, the lobby did it. If a media outlet edits a story, the lobby pressured them. If a writers’ festival cancels an author, the lobby played a part. 

This is a point made with characteristic bluntness by journalist and former editor-in-chief of The Age Michael Gawenda. In his memoir, My Life as a Jew, Gawenda scoffs at the narrative that an all-powerful shadow network dictates national foreign policy or terrifies newsrooms. He writes that like most conspiracy theories, the monolithic myth is “bullshit, but powerful bullshit, because it is rooted in ancient prejudice”. 

The phrase “the Israel lobby” has appeared repeatedly in several writers’ festival controversies. In August 2025, more than 50 writers and academics withdrew from the Bendigo Writers Festival after a new code of conduct was sent to participants shortly before the festival. Australian-born writer of Palestinian and Egyptian parentage Randa Abdel-Fattah was among those who withdrew, arguing that the requirements would force her into self-censorship. She described the Australian Academic Alliance Against Antisemitism (5A) as a “pro-Israel lobby group”, even though that group did not make the final decision about the code of conduct. 

In her account of the Adelaide Writers’ Week debacle that occurred in early 2026, when Abdel-Fattah was removed from the event, author Hannah Ferguson writes of her disgust and explains that she decided to “withdraw from a festival that has silenced the most pertinent voice”. This, she argues, was “an active choice to rail against a Zionist lobby that seeks to control every major institution in this country.” 

Where is the evidence that any Jewish group influenced Adelaide Festival Board’s decision to remove Abdel-Fattah? 

Literary critic Lisa Hill makes another pertinent point: those authors who decided to withdraw from the festival were, in effect, supporting Abdel-Fattah, despite her “abhorrent views”, including that “Zionists have no claim or right to cultural safety.” Hill points out: “Well, that includes me, even though I am not Jewish, because I believe that Israel has a right to exist.” It also includes me, for the same reason.  

Grace Tame, author and 2021 Australian of the Year, has also adopted the “lobby” language. In February 2026, Tame spoke at a Sydney protest against the visit of Israeli President Isaac Herzog. During her speech, she referred to Herzog as a war criminal and led a chant to “globalise the intifada”. After being called “difficult” by the Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, she wrote that “I know he and his government have been corrupted by lobbyists”.

In a March 2026 ABC Radio Sydney interview, Tame mentioned a “pro-Israel lobby group that targets people who speak out about the Israeli government and their actions and try to get them shut down.” She went on to describe this as “a pretty classic part of the propaganda playbook”. 

Flanagan made a point of noting that some of Australia’s leading Jewish figures have spoken out against the Israel lobby and tried to warn Australians. One is Louise Adler, a former publisher and the director of Adelaide Writers’ Week from 2023 to 2026. She is on the advisory committee of the Jewish Council of Australia, an organisation only established in January 2024. 

In June, Adler wrote about the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, which finished on 26 August:  

“If the Royal Commission is serious about investigating the nature of antisemitism and its ‘key drivers’, it should begin with Australia’s Israel lobby – the leading proponents of the conflation of antisemitism with antizionism.” 

She even attacked the credibility of people submitting evidence, claiming that “most will have been scripted by the lobby’s full-time ‘project officers’”. Most? Mine was not. 

There is, at times, an almost reverential response to figures such as Adler, Flanagan and Abdel-Fattah in parts of the literary and cultural world. They also seem to admire and reinforce one another, and seldom, if ever, challenge each other. A mutual affirmation.  

On Instagram, Adler described Flanagan as “fearless”, noting there was a full house at his Festival of Dangerous Ideas’ speech for which he “received a truly deserved standing ovation”. She urged people to live stream "his clarion call.”  

After Adler resigned as director of Adelaide Writer’s Week, she wrote an article in The Guardian in which she said she “could not be party to silencing writers”. Abdel-Fattah shared this on Instagram, describing her as “brilliant”. “I stand with her,” she wrote. Flanagan also praised Adler in The Age, writing: “Louise Adler is a brilliant, combative director who has made Adelaide Writers’ Week the most successful, exciting and globally significant writers’ festival in Australia.” 

Words have impact. Repeated often enough, across festival stages and opinion columns, a phrase can become a mindless mantra. A simple label suddenly sounds like a hard, undeniable fact: there is one identifiable, powerful organisation sitting behind the scenes, pulling the strings. 

Perhaps I am particularly sensitive to this. In the 1970s I was caught up in a Hindu-based cult in India, and the experience left me wary of mantras and groupthink – of the way repetition can make an idea feel true simply because we hear it over and over. 

To see how unfair this label “the Israel lobby” is, we only need to flip the script. Imagine if a commentator wrote: “A dangerous, unified pro-Palestinian lobby is controlling our universities and tearing our society apart and contributing to Islamophobia.” 

Pro-Palestinian advocacy is fragmented. The various groups disagree on goals and tactics. There is no single pro-Palestinian political organisation that speaks for everyone. 

Why can’t we do the same with pro-Israeli advocacy? Criticism of the Israeli government is legitimate. Criticism of Jewish organisations is legitimate. But criticism should be directed at identifiable people and organisations for identifiable actions. 

This reveals the ultimate contradiction in Flanagan’s argument. He warns us not to blame all Jewish people for the actions of the Israeli government. Yet, he immediately turns around and bundles separate organisations and individuals into a single, ominous “Israel lobby”. 

Flanagan asks: “To what extent has the Israel lobby itself contributed to antisemitism in Australia?” 

But what if we turn the question around? Rather than asking whether some mysterious “Israel lobby” is contributing to antisemitism, should we also ask whether rhetoric like Flanagan’s is contributing to it? Could the relentless mantra “the Israel lobby” be feeding antisemitism in Australia, including the antisemitism that Flanagan denies was present at Bondi? 

You might also like
  • Sydney Uni commissions independent review after ‘Globalise the Intifada’ campaign
    Deborah Stone
  • New evidence points to Iranian responsibility for Diaspora antisemitic attacks
    Colin Shindler
  • Arab women topple politician accused of sexual harassment in landmark case
    Ben Lynfield
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    antisemitism online
    NewsAustralia

    Proposed digital care law to offer protection against online antisemitism

    Deborah Stone
    Protest against settler violence in Jerusalem
    DebateAustralia

    Sanctioning settlements is a defence of Israel, not an attack

    Elisheva Madar 3
    bialik Jewish schools shabbat
    OpinionAustralia

    Jewish schools are the marinade that infuses continuity

    Jeremy Stowe-Lindner

Comments9

  • Avatar of Mark Ian

    Mark Ian14 September at 11:06 pm

    Palestinians refused 92 % of the West Bank with Land Swaps and hit Israel with murder suicide bombers designed to destroy Israeli Peace Advocates from the 1992 Rabin Peres Election .
    They had in the Past violently attacked the November 29 1947 Partition Plan causing war and the displacement of 750,000 Palestinians from their home .
    Peace in 1947 would mean all Palestinians living in the Arab State .
    They blocked Jewish Escape to Palestine from May 1939 without compensatory refuge in other Islamic Lands like Turkey that proclaimed- we will not take in Jewish Refugees even to save them from the Holocaust.
    This is the Israeli Lobby remembering history-long may it be strong .

  • Avatar of Debbie Lustig

    Debbie Lustig14 September at 01:23 am

    Here again is the stupendous overreach of the term “Israel/Zionist/Jewish Lobby”.
    If any group was so powerful as to influence the media, the government, culture, universities etc, it’s doing an appalling job of it. Because if it was so powerful, it would also have the power to curb the insane, obsessive antisemitism – lightly camouflaged as anti-Israel sentiment – that’s spiralled out of control.
    Flanagan’s ideas of the Israel/Zionist/Jewish lobby are mad, paranoid and deranged. They are nothing more than smears and vilifications which reflect a society dangerously out of control – one that has utterly lost its ethical moorings.
    The real questions, for me, are how such a bigot can write with such gravitas and beauty. And how he ended up with these views. Someone should ask him what happened to him in relation to Israel and the Jews. Where his breathtaking Jew-hatred began, and why.

  • Avatar of judy

    judy11 September at 11:01 am

    (begin part 2)

    (4) “the [cult] experience left me wary … of the way repetition can make an idea feel true simply because we hear it over and over.” [garden] joseph goebbels said something similar: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” and we know how effective nazi propaganda became. and still is, tragically.

    (5) personally, i felt exhausted by the time i got to the end of this article, with all the examples. it seemed like the author wanted to identify as many “important people” as possible and attribute some “nasty-words” to each. what came to mind is a quote from shakespeare’s macbeth: “the lady doth protest too much, methinks.”

    (6) my word-finder identified 20 instances of “lobby” in flanagan’s speech. 19? 20? whatever … way too overloaded and conspiracy-invoking.

    peace, judy

  • Avatar of judy

    judy11 September at 11:01 am

    (1) i’m puzzled / dismayed by the editor’s choice to use the octopus as the lead graphic. it’s a symbol that’s often accused of being anti-semitic. does the symbol become more-ok when we use it on ourselves?

    (2) in general, i cringe every time i hear “israel lobby,” “jewish lobby,” “zionist lobby”; i invite the user to define that term, or not use it at all, as it’s overloaded and highly associated with conspiracy theories. no definition == no further discussion.

    (3) i read flanagan’s speech at the link provided. i wonder: how would we react had flanagan provided an objective definition for “israel lobby” and used that? for example, “three self-declared ‘zionist’ or ‘israel-focused’ ‘advocacy’ groups, i.e., AIJAC, ECAJ, ZFA,” and then used the acronym AEZ, for example, instead of “israel lobby”?
    and how would we react if flanagan had provided objective, irrefutable references / examples to some of the accusations against the “israel lobby,” e.g., “part of AEZ did / said < this, that >“?

    (end part 1)

  • Avatar of Bram van O.

    Bram van O.11 September at 10:29 am

    Mary, I understand your concern about the term (pro)Israel lobby. How do you suggest one refers to a collection of pro Israel advocacy groups?

    The past three years have seen a spate of reported complaints against individuals in the arts. Each of the complaints was on the grounds that the person had expressed concern over Israel’s actions in Palestine. In all cases the complaint was against an action the person did undertake as a citizen, outside the context of the role the person played in the environment where the complaint was made. Flanagan calls attention to these events as a pattern of behavior.

    Antoinette Latouf (ECAJ, Lawyers for Israel)
    Khaled Sabsabi (ECAJ)
    Randa Abdel-Fatah – Bendigo Writers festival (consortium of Jewish academics)
    Randa Abdel Fatah – Adelaide Writers Week (Jewish Community Council of South Australia, Australian Jewish Association)
    David Rowe – Financial Review (ECAJ, Anti-Defamation Commission)
    Matt Chun (Queensland Jewish Board of Deputies, Australian Jewish Association)
    Grace Tame – International Womans Day Bendigo (Australian Jewish Association)

    Not one of these groups is exclusively a pro Israel advocacy group. All of them proudly advocate for Jewish interests.

    What collective noun would you suggest for this gaggle of organisations?

  • Avatar of joe lenzo

    joe lenzo11 September at 01:37 am

    We will have to agree to disagree on this one. It might not be that they wield too much power but that the govt is scared schemeless of being call ed antisemitic. antisemitic and islamophobia are the two most divisive words driving anti-cohesion, What’s wrong with “racist” and “hate crimes”

  • Avatar of philip mendes

    philip mendes10 September at 11:06 pm

    Massive kudos to Mary Garden for interrogating the Blame the Victim nonsense that informs attacks on Jewish community advocacy groups. The subtext of these attacks is that Jewish community groups should not have equal right to participate in public discourse and debates. Hence, Jews should be relegated to second class citizenry. Imagine if Flanagan or others applied the same prejudiced assumptions to APAN or other Palestinian community lobby groups.

  • Avatar of Little Bird Bookshop, Brisbane

    Little Bird Bookshop, Brisbane10 September at 05:43 am

    What a terrific article. What to add?

    The Flanagans have been in my life since about 1977, when my family did what we non-Jews are allowed to do and moved to a place to which we weren’t indigenous.

    We moved from the UK, where my father was a never-persecuted, well-paid, Labour-supporting, antisemitic and anti-Zionist (they almost always go together) hospital doctor working for the NHS and my mother was a more conservative and kinder NHS physiotherapist.

    I joined the all-powerful Jewish lobby shortly after October 7 when I saw a huge number of people led naturally enough by the Greens calling Gaza a genocide. This was when the official death toll was 1900 and all the dead could well have been combatants.

    Since then the abuse has been relentless and deeply painful in a number of ways. The only assistance I have ever got from the all-powerful Jewish lobby has been that on four of the eight occasions on which my shop’s front door lock was superglued, the problem was fixed by two Israelis (both indigenous to Israel) who didn’t even charge me for the replacement locks.

    If you want to help this ally, follow Little Bird Bookshop on Facebook.

  • Avatar of Michael Gawenda

    Michael Gawenda10 September at 05:15 am

    This is a very fine article. I think the point that Mary makes- that once you come to believe this conspiracy theory about an all powerful lobby, any argument you might raise against it simply confirms its power. That’s the maniacal power of conspiracy thinking.

About the author

Mary Garden

Mary Garden

Mary Garden is an award-winning author and journalist whose work has appeared in Australian and international publications, including The Guardian, The Australian and the Australian Financial Review. She has a PhD in Journalism.

More from the author

OpinionIsrael

‘What about Hamas?’ The protesters’ blind spot that can’t be ignored

OpinionAustralia

The ‘Believe Women’ icon who doesn’t believe Jewish women