Published: 20 February 2025
Last updated: 6 August 2025
Concept and research: Kate Lewis
Data analytics: Danny Companez
When Creative Australia reversed its selection of artist Khaled Sabsabi to represent Australia at the 2026 Venice Biennale, the art world cried foul. At the time of writing, 3626 people had signed an open letter protesting the decision as “artistic censorship”.
But there is a confronting double standard in the trending hashtag #ReinstateKhaled.
Some of the arts figures touting “artistic freedom” for Khaled Sabsabi are the same people who called for a boycott of Israeli artist Ruth Patir at last year’s Venice Biennale.
The Jewish Independent has conducted a data analysis of the letter in support of Sabsabi, comparing it to an open letter signed by 24,076 individuals calling for the deplatforming of the Israeli Pavilion at the 2024 Biennale and the cancellation of Israel’s Biennale artist Ruth Patir.
At least 211 names appear on both lists. (Some names may have been omitted due to differences in the formats of signatures on the two lists).
Synthesising the two lists reveals a double standard in the attitudes of the arts community. Apparently artistic freedom is essential for a Lebanese Australian, even if his work appears to celebrate terrorism, but not for an Israeli, whose exhibition was about fertility and motherhood.




