Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
Australia Votes 2025EditorialAustralia

Antisemitism politics is out of control 

Cries of ‘kapo’ and anonymous accusations of weakness on antisemitism have no place in the election campaign.
The Jewish Independent
Print this
two speech bubbles with cracks

Illustration: TJI

Published: 24 April 2025

Last updated: 24 April 2025

Two incidents in recent days have exploited the legitimate concerns of Australia’s Jewish community to play dirty politics with the election campaign.  

These cases of hateful language and anonymous slurs must be firmly resisted by those who stand to lose most.  

Both cases are examples of inappropriate and divisive politicking that purport to be acting in the interests of the Jewish community but have the reverse effect.  

The first example concerns the ALP’s decision to preference the Greens in Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus’ electorate of Isaacs. The preference deal has legitimately upset many Jewish voters. The Greens’ divisive support for aggressive pro-Palestinian protests over the past year means the prospect of votes going their way from Australia’s most high-profile Jewish MP feels deeply uncomfortable.  

But the reaction from certain sectors of the media and the Jewish community is much more worrying. Caroline Marcus on Sky News Outsiders Program used the word “kapo” to describe Dreyfus, implying his preference deal was analogous to complicity with Nazis. 

“Kapo [is] a German word for the Jewish concentration camp inmates who collaborated with the Nazis to survive, and that's the word that struck me when I learned Mark Dreyfus, again, our most powerful Jewish Australian, had betrayed his own people by striking a deal with the Greens,” Marcus said.  

She clarified that “of course, I'm not saying that Dreyfus is, in fact, literally collaborating with Nazis” but then described preferencing the Greens as a “backflip” on the occasions  Dreyfus has called out the Greens, and “a betrayal to Jews”.  

We shouldn’t tolerate this any more than we would tolerate misuse of a candidate’s Aboriginal heritage or their sexual orientation.  

The far-right Australian Jewish Association endorsed Marcus’ language by sharing her comment on its  social media. 

There’s nothing wrong with criticising Labor’s direction to preference Greens voters. Preference deals are an arcane art form, frequently resulting in strange bedfellows. They are the result of opaque party machinations and, while as a cabinet minister Dreyfus will not speak out against his party’s decision, any knowledge of his politics and Jewish commitment suggests he would have preferred not to preference the Greens. 

The Isaacs preferencing will have been traded for Greens preferencing Labor in a more marginal seat – with the full knowledge that it will never be implemented because Dreyfus will almost certainly be returned in the safe Labor seat.  

But whatever one thinks of the deal, the use of the term “kapo” is deeply offensive, as is Marcus’ subsequent attempt to weaponise Dreyfus’ family’s Holocaust history. We shouldn’t tolerate this any more than we would tolerate misuse of a candidate’s Aboriginal heritage or their sexual orientation.  

Whoever is behind this bad faith campaign, they are not doing the Jewish community any favours.

The second incident occurred in Wentworth, held by independent Allegra Spender, where anonymous leaflets were distributed attacking Spender as "weak" on antisemitism.

The more than 47,000 unauthorised pamphlets are being investigated by the Australian Electoral Commission, as they breach regulations which require attribution on all electoral material. 

Liberal Wentworth candidate Ro Knox is running a strong campaign on antisemitism, which is an important issue in the most Jewish electorate in the country.

Knox is is not responsible for this attack. Her office said it had no knowledge of the pamphlet and that “everything we produce has our authorisation on it". 

The ABC reported that IVE, a printing company with past links to the Liberal party, printed and distributed the material but does not suggest it wrote the leaflet.  

The pamphlets are not an isolated incident. Spender has been the subject of other attacks questioning her advocacy on antisemitism.  

Whoever is behind these bad faith campaigns, they are not doing the Jewish community any favours. Making antisemitism an issue in this election campaign  will not reduce its impact and will only increase fear. There is no significant difference between the parties on antisemitism and countering it should be beyond party politics.  

The increasing incidence of antisemitism and decline in social cohesion over Israel-Palestine has many Australian Jews on high alert. 

But we shouldn’t forget that we live in a society that is fundamentally tolerant and decent, with a civilised democracy. 

Our interest is in supporting the forces of civil discourse and honest debate and in speaking out against those who misuse our interests for their own agendas. 

You might also like
  • British Greens equate Zionism with racism
    Ruth Eglash
  • Arab party ban won’t hold but reveals a changed Israel
    Ben Lynfield
  • Fear of Netanyahu victory may drive big surge in Palestinian voter turnout
    Ben Lynfield
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    JA06
    FeatureArts & Culture

    From Bondi to the Tree of Life

    Gideon Cohen
    tame kostakidis west
    AnalysisAustralia

    How not to apologise

    Zac Klugman
    Nadia
    ReflectionAustralia

    Between communities: finding Jewish belonging after migration

    Florencia Tuchin

About the author

The Jewish Independent

The Jewish Independent

More from the author

EditorialIsrael

Three years after Oct 7: an anniversary of reckoning

VideoArts & Culture

Highlights from Melbourne Jewish Book Week

EditorialAustralia

Facing a new year with the knowledge life can be better

VideoLifestyle

Neurodivergence and inclusion in the Jcom