Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenWorld
FeatureWorld

Australian academics are a key source of Wikipedia’s anti-Israel bias

By framing Zionism as equivalent to colonialism or genocide on Wikipedia, a network of more than three dozen editors has normalised extremist narratives.  
Ashley Rindsberg
Print this
Wikipedia has been manipulated to create a distorted view of Zionism (TJI)

Wikipedia has been manipulated to create a distorted view of Zionism (TJI)

Published: 20 October 2025

Last updated: 21 October 2025

In August, the US House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform launched a formal investigation into the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit behind Wikipedia, over allegations of foreign interference and co-ordinated manipulation of its content.

The inquiry seeks to determine whether organised groups of editors are engaged in “systematic efforts to advance antisemitic and anti-Israel information”.

Wikipedia’s influence is hard to overstate. The platform underpins much of the internet’s knowledge infrastructure: Google draws from it, Siri cites it, and AI models like ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude are trained on its content. Manipulate Wikipedia, and you manipulate the backbone of information itself. 

In October 2024, I revealed a network of more than three dozen editors — dubbed the “Gang of 40” — who have effectively hijacked Israel-related content. This group has made around one million edits across 10,000 articles, reshaping the entire intellectual to paint Israel as a settler-colonial enterprise.

Their most recent — and most striking — victory is the insertion of a sentence into the lead of Wikipedia’s Zionism article that equates the movement of Jewish self-determination with ethnic cleansing: 

“Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible”. 

This statement, written in Wikipedia’s authoritative “wikivoice,” is locked in place under a 12-month “moratorium,” a maneuver that has never been used in this context, and prevents any changes to the lead. 

Australians should take note: as I reported this month in Tablet magazine, prominent members of this network appear to be Australian. This includes an influential Wikipedia admin, Zero0000, who has been previously identified as Brendan McKay, a mathematician and computer scientist. Another member of the group, Nishidani, was identified as Australian academic, Peter Nicholas Dale, who has been deeply involved in shaping Israel-related entries — and whitewashing the abuses of Iranian-linked terror groups.

When Australian academics manipulate Wikipedia to embed anti-Israel propaganda, they provide intellectual cover for hatred that finds expression on campuses and in the streets 

Readers of The Jewish Independent will be painfully aware that Australia is experiencing an unprecedented antisemitism crisis. What’s less clear is how the connection between digital propaganda and real-world hatred affects the growth of real-world antisemitism.  

By framing Zionism as equivalent to colonialism or genocide, the 'Gang of 40' has normalised extremist narratives that fuel antisemitism offline.  

As an investigative reporter focused on digital information, I’ve seen up close how groups like this function. They dominate discussions numerically, swarm forums in coordinated bursts, and wear down opponents until exhausted administrators ratify their changes. In the case of the Zionism article, the administrator who approved the moratorium later admitted to lacking subject matter expertise and failing to apply rules governing contentious topics. Yet that procedural failure cemented the edit for at least a year. 

That many of these editors appear to be academics should come as no surprise. Universities — traditionally pillars of free inquiry — are now flashpoints for antisemitism. Protests and encampments have become permanent fixtures, and Jewish students report feeling unsafe. The intimidation, swarming, and stacking of the deck that’s used to silence Jewish voices in academia today are echoed online, often to greater effect. 

When Australian academics manipulate Wikipedia to embed anti-Israel propaganda, they provide intellectual cover for hatred that finds expression on campuses and in the streets. 

The Australian government is beginning to act. In July 2025, a national plan was announced that could penalise universities for failing to protect Jewish students and deport non-citizens who incite hatred. But these measures are only a starting point. Platforms like Wikipedia require scrutiny too. 

The US Oversight Committee’s request for editor logs and communications is an encouraging step. If its findings confirm foreign state involvement, Wikipedia will join TikTok, X, and other platforms as a tool in geopolitical influence campaigns. Australians must ask whether they’re comfortable having their academics play a central role in this information war. 

You might also like
  • Sanctioning settlements is a defence of Israel, not an attack
    Elisheva Madar
  • Sanctions must influence, not just perform disapproval
    Adam Slonim
  • Mind the mentality: not every rejection is antisemitism
    Nomi Kaltmann
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Protest
    AnalysisIsrael

    Western ‘Palestinianism’ colonises everything – and hurts Palestinians

    Andres Spokoiny 5
    Netanyahu Ben Gvir Getty
    Israel Hamas WarAnalysisWorld

    Diaspora leadership must be candid about its disillusion with Netanyahu

    Colin Shindler 2
    Erdogan Turkey
    AnalysisIsrael

    Turkey emerges as military threat to Israel

    Dror Doron

About the author

Ashley Rindsberg

Ashley Rindsberg

Ashley Rindsberg is an investigative reporter who covers the global battle over online information. He is the founder of NeutralPOV, a platform dedicated to exposing manipulation in the digital knowledge ecosystem.

Comments4

  • Avatar of Michelle Braunstein

    Michelle Braunstein26 October at 09:13 am

    Quite ironically (and fortunately) it is common that under university policies students can be penalised for drawing on Wikipedia articles in their assessments, due to its lack of scholarly credibility. Therefore, the disingenuousness and lack of integrity of this group who use it to push blood libels has a double charge. They know it is a nest of unreliable, unstable, uncritical and incorrect content. Yet they cynically make themsleves at home there and attempt to shape what they would see as the minds of the unwashed and uneducated. It checks out.

  • Avatar of Simon Krite

    Simon Krite23 October at 06:43 pm

    Ashley, brilliant and vital work. You’ve pulled back the curtain on a manipulation most people would never think to question, yet it shapes the very language we use to understand Israel and Zionism. Exposing how coordinated bias hides behind “neutral” platforms like Wikipedia is no small task, and you’ve done it with precision and courage. Keep pushing. This kind of truth-telling matters more than ever.

  • Avatar of David Schulberg

    David Schulberg23 October at 01:13 pm

    An example in the wikipedia entry for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation:
    “Intended to bypass the United Nations as the main supplier of aid in Gaza,[3] GHF began operating in May 2025 as a response to fraudulent[4][5] Israeli claims that aid was being routinely diverted by Hamas.”

  • Avatar of Daniel Coleman

    Daniel Coleman23 October at 08:57 am

    Thanks Ashley, I had no idea. Of course most Jews would not look to Wikipedia for a definition of Zionism.
    The level of calumny in just the first few lines is beyond shocking.
    Cheers, Dan