Published: 20 October 2025
Last updated: 21 October 2025
In August, the US House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform launched a formal investigation into the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit behind Wikipedia, over allegations of foreign interference and co-ordinated manipulation of its content.
The inquiry seeks to determine whether organised groups of editors are engaged in “systematic efforts to advance antisemitic and anti-Israel information”.
Wikipedia’s influence is hard to overstate. The platform underpins much of the internet’s knowledge infrastructure: Google draws from it, Siri cites it, and AI models like ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude are trained on its content. Manipulate Wikipedia, and you manipulate the backbone of information itself.
In October 2024, I revealed a network of more than three dozen editors — dubbed the “Gang of 40” — who have effectively hijacked Israel-related content. This group has made around one million edits across 10,000 articles, reshaping the entire intellectual to paint Israel as a settler-colonial enterprise.
Their most recent — and most striking — victory is the insertion of a sentence into the lead of Wikipedia’s Zionism article that equates the movement of Jewish self-determination with ethnic cleansing:
“Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible”.
This statement, written in Wikipedia’s authoritative “wikivoice,” is locked in place under a 12-month “moratorium,” a maneuver that has never been used in this context, and prevents any changes to the lead.





Comments4
Michelle Braunstein26 October at 09:13 am
Quite ironically (and fortunately) it is common that under university policies students can be penalised for drawing on Wikipedia articles in their assessments, due to its lack of scholarly credibility. Therefore, the disingenuousness and lack of integrity of this group who use it to push blood libels has a double charge. They know it is a nest of unreliable, unstable, uncritical and incorrect content. Yet they cynically make themsleves at home there and attempt to shape what they would see as the minds of the unwashed and uneducated. It checks out.
Simon Krite23 October at 06:43 pm
Ashley, brilliant and vital work. You’ve pulled back the curtain on a manipulation most people would never think to question, yet it shapes the very language we use to understand Israel and Zionism. Exposing how coordinated bias hides behind “neutral” platforms like Wikipedia is no small task, and you’ve done it with precision and courage. Keep pushing. This kind of truth-telling matters more than ever.
David Schulberg23 October at 01:13 pm
An example in the wikipedia entry for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation:
“Intended to bypass the United Nations as the main supplier of aid in Gaza,[3] GHF began operating in May 2025 as a response to fraudulent[4][5] Israeli claims that aid was being routinely diverted by Hamas.”
Daniel Coleman23 October at 08:57 am
Thanks Ashley, I had no idea. Of course most Jews would not look to Wikipedia for a definition of Zionism.
The level of calumny in just the first few lines is beyond shocking.
Cheers, Dan