Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenWorld
FeatureWorld

Jan 6 hearings reveal dangerous echoes of Nazism and hate

Dan Coleman
Print this

Published: 28 June 2022

Last updated: 5 March 2024

DAN COLEMAN explores the implications of Trump’s January 6 insurrection for all who depend on the freedoms of liberal democracy

Jews tend to do well in liberal democracies. Historically, such societies are not the sites of pogroms, purges, or holocausts, and, at least in the post-war era, they rarely have formal structures of discrimination against Jews.

Thus, Donald Trump’s coup attempt after he lost the 2020 election and the current congressional hearings on the January 6 insurrection should have particular salience for the Jewish community. After all, while this would-be autocrat’s racism explicitly targeted Muslims and Hispanics rather than Jews, his white supremacist followers do not make such fine distinctions.

As Jews we understand that we are the scapegoats of first and last resort. It may be the job held by a person of colour that stokes a white American’s resentment, but he believes that ultimately it is the Jew who is to blame.

So far, the January 6 Committee has held five two-hour hearings detailing Trump’s certain knowledge that he lost the election and that his efforts to overturn the results had no basis in law. They have laid out his dogged pursuit of those efforts nonetheless and his use of his “stop the steal” campaign to bilk hundreds of millions of dollars from his followers.

The most harrowing day of the hearings may have been the first. In that day’s testimony, Trump himself was largely overshadowed by the white supremacists who had answered his call to violent insurrection. Democrat congresswoman Zoe Lofgren  took the lead in showing how the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers began organising well before January 6, focused on their role in preventing the counting of the electoral votes for president.

As Jews we have seen it before...That Trump was ultimately unsuccessful should not blind us to the similarities

It was chilling to watch filmmaker Nick Quested’s previously unreleased footage of several hundred Proud Boys marching en masse toward the capital well in advance of the mob that was about to be riled up by Trump. Later, as video played of a riot swamping the Capitol police force, officers described a battle scene for which they were not trained, one that led to the injury and, in some cases, death of their colleagues.

“I couldn’t believe my eyes,” was the testimony of Capitol Police Officer Caroline Edwards. “There were officers on the ground. They were bleeding, they were throwing up. I mean, I saw friends with blood all over their faces. I was slipping in people’s blood.” Edwards herself was knocked unconscious in the melee.

But the Proud Boys were trained, some military veterans. They were well organised, benefiting from advance planning and surveillance, weaponised by a demagogue to violently serve his political ambitions.

As Jews, we have seen it before. The images of Proud Boys in battle recalled familiar scenes: Nazi Brown Shirts in street fights with communists in early 1930s Germany. That Trump was ultimately unsuccessful should not blind us to the similarities.

Certainly, a goal of the hearings is to open the eyes of the American people to the persistent threat to their democracy. Committee members and witnesses repeatedly expressed their reverence to the US Constitution, one witness calling it a gift from God. As the hearings had begun just a few days after Shavuot, this brought to mind the injunction from Proverbs “a good document has been given to you, forsake it not.”

But, in the US Congress, many have forsaken the Constitution to which they’ve sworn an oath of allegiance. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger are the only Republicans among the nine committee members. The Republican leadership quashed a proposal for an independent investigation, wanting to reserve the ability to dismiss the findings as a partisan attack by Democrats.

This is not an area with much nuance. Either you support the overthrow of the US government, or you don’t

Cheney was having none of it, declaring on day 1 “Tonight, I say this to my Republican colleagues who are defending the indefensible: There will come a day when Donald Trump is gone but your dishonour will remain." Let us hope that day comes to an America that can still distinguish the honourable from the traitorous. Cheney has been disavowed by her party and faces a Trump-backed primary challenger later this year.

Commenting on House GOP leader Kevin McCarthy’s resistance to the work of the committee, Cheney said on the program CBS Sunday Morning, “I think that he has decided that the most important thing to him is to attempt to be Speaker of the House, and therefore he is embracing those in our party who are antisemitic, he is embracing those in our party who are white nationalists, he is lying about what happened on Jan. 6, and he’s turned his back on the Constitution.”

Strong words but true. This is not an area with much nuance. Either you support the overthrow of the US government, or you don’t. And McCarthy is hardly alone. Scores of Republicans have won primary elections this year on a “stop the steal” platform. Republican members of Congress have downplayed the January 6 event, calling the insurrectionists peaceful protesters or even tourists.

One who knows a bit about tourists is Republican congressman. Barry Loudermilk. The committee played a surveillance video showing Loudermilk leading a very unusual tour through the Capitol the day before the insurrection. In a letter to Loudermilk, committee chair Bennie Thompson (D-MS) wrote that “Individuals on the tour photographed and recorded areas of the complex not typically of interest to tourists, including hallways, staircases, and security checkpoints.”

Tellingly, one of those taking photographs of a staircase was videotaped the next day marching to the capital declaring “There’s no escape Pelosi, Schumer, Nadler. We’re coming for you.” Nancy Pelosi is Speaker of the House and a bête  noire of the far right. Senator Chuck Schumer and congressman Jerry Nadler are New York Jews.

In a strange bedfellows moment, Loudermilk has joined Schumer, Nadler and Pelosi in receiving endorsement from American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the leading pro-Israel lobby group.

There are more hearings coming up, with a final session anticipated in September. It’s hard to imagine how the case against Trump and his cronies could get much worse. But the committee does not have the authority to make criminal charges. That will be up to Attorney-General Merrick Garland. Ultimately, however, the verdict will be cast by the American people at the ballot box, this year and in 2024, either for the big lie or for democracy.

A witness on day 4 quoted president Ronald Reagan who called the two centuries of peaceful transfer of power from one administration to another “a miracle.” But, as Cheney pointed out in her closing remarks that day “institutions do not defend themselves. Individuals do that.”

Individuals defend democracy based on a shared commitment to its institutions and a belief that there might be shared values or truths that bridge inevitable disagreements across the polity. America is founded on the notion that certain truths are “self-evident”. Yet, after the four years and more than 30,000 lies of Donald Trump, the truth has become an elusive commodity.

If Americans fail to embrace the findings of the January 6 Committee, American democracy may dwindle to little more than a shell, a once great nation fracturing, becoming ever more fertile ground for hatred and conspiracy.

Photo: January 6 insurrection (AAP)

You might also like
  • Facing a new year with the knowledge life can be better
    The Jewish Independent
  • Now is the time for the Royal Commission to deliver, not be politicised
    Dean Sherr
  • Was the barmi a shemozzle? How Australians use Jewish words 
    Caroline Hendy & Emma Breslow
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Pro-Palestine Rally Outside Foreign Commonwealth Development Office
    AnalysisWorld

    UK’s dramatic policy change on Israel-Palestine

    Colin Shindler 3
    JDC Joint Nepal
    FeatureWorld

    ‘Your help is extremely needed’: Jewish aid group on the ground after Nepal flood

    Peter Kohn
    interfaith war
    FeatureWorld

    The illusion of Just War: Conflict ethics in Judaism, Christianity and Islam

    Dave Moskovitz

About the author

Dan Coleman

Dan Coleman

Dan Coleman is a former member of the Carrboro, North Carolina Town Council, and a former political columnist for the Durham (NC) Morning Herald. He is the author of Ecopolitics: Building A Green Society. He lives in Melbourne.

More from the author

AnalysisWorld

Young Republicans show alarming rise in antisemitic views

FeatureWorld

Controversial frontrunner makes mayoral race a test for Jewish New Yorkers 

AnalysisWorld

Trump and MAGA turn on Israel over scale of bombing and settler attacks

AnalysisWorld

On heels of the ceasefire, Trump II era begins