Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
Australia Votes 2025EditorialAustralia

Make your vote meaningful

There is a genuine choice in this election for Jewish voters, but it is not in the narrow issues of responding to antisemitism or Israel policy.
The Jewish Independent
Print this
Albanese, Dutton and Parliament House illustration

A meaningful vote will not be based solely on the issue of antisemitism or Israel policy (Illustration: TJI).

Published: 1 May 2025

Last updated: 1 May 2025

Many Jewish Australians have been sold a lie this election. They have been told that rising antisemitism and controversial Israel-Palestine policy mean they have no choice but to reject the Labor government. Such a claim is self-serving Liberal politicking.

Like all Australians, Jews should vote for whichever government we believe best represents our interests and the interests of the society to which we belong. Very few Jews will vote for Pauline Hanson’s One Nation given its hostility to minorities, and very few will vote Greens given the party’s hostility to Israel and insensitivity to Australian Jews.
 
But between these extremes, we may legitimately vote left or right, according to our beliefs; select major or minor parties or independents according to who we think will best represent us; and vote ideologically or strategically, as we choose.  

There is not a significant difference between the major parties’ policies on antisemitism, and the differences in foreign policy are neither substantive nor impactful. Neither the experience of antisemitism faced by Jewish Australians nor the conflict in Israel-Palestine is likely to change as a result of who wins this election.  

It is not sensible to allow our passions about foreign policy or our fears about antisemitism to swamp our assessments of the core issues that are at stake: economic policy, environmental management, and which government is most likely to build an equitable, safe and cohesive society.  

Genuine choice

Like all Australians, we are concerned about the cost of living and should consider the offerings of the parties on housing affordability, tertiary education debt, taxation, and the cost of healthcare.  

Like all Australians, we are deeply affected by the environment and should consider the strongly contrasting policies on nuclear energy and renewables, and the different offerings on energy subsidies.  

More than many other Australians, we understand the importance of social cohesion and are disturbed by the growing rifts in our society. We should listen carefully not only to the (minor) policy differences but also to the nature of the rhetoric from both sides. It is essential to consider not just how it makes us feel, but what effect it will have on those with whom we must live.  

It is not in our interest to endorse statements that rev up division, even if they do so by taking positions we like. Playing politics with antisemitism is bad for the Jews. The failure of both parties to achieve a bipartisan policy on antisemitism when they have no substantive differences exposes the weakness in our adversarial politics.  

Antisemitism policy

Nor should we be deceived into thinking that a government of any colour will be able to reduce antisemitism easily or swiftly. While there is some evidence that the number of incidents is already reducing, antisemitism is a complex phenomenon, especially in the current context, and requires responses at many levels of society.

Liberal leader Peter Dutton’s rhetoric on antisemitism is different from that of Labor’s Anthony Albanese, more in style than in substance. Dutton runs the traditional right-wing line emphasising security and using the language of strength. He has implied the cause of antisemitism is in Muslim migration and promised to expel non-citizens convicted of antisemitic acts (a circumstance that has yet to arise).  Albanese has also strongly condemned antisemitism, but he prefers the calmer message of building multiculturalism and emphasising that hate has “no place in Australia”.  

But the major parties are almost identical in the amount of funding for security; the commitment to police resourcing to fight antisemitism; and the promise of support for Jewish cultural initiatives such as the Jewish Arts Quarter in Melbourne, the WA Holocaust Museum, and the Sydney Jewish Museum.   

The Israel question

There has been a great deal of focus on policy differences between the parties on Israel-Palestine. Both parties support a two-state solution, endorsing both Israel’s right to live in peace and security and the Palestinians' right to sovereignty. 

But the Liberals are unequivocal in their support of Israel, including the actions of the Netanyahu government, while Labor walks a much finer line: condemning October 7 and endorsing Israel’s right to defend itself, but speaking out strongly on illegal settlements in the West Bank and on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The Albanese government’s recent UN votes have included support for the “permanent sovereignty of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem”. ALP party conferences continue to push for immediate recognition of a Palestinian state by Australia and, while the parliamentary party has so far resisted this call, it certainly cannot be ruled out under a Labor government.  

The irony of the strong Jewish community opposition is that there is nothing in Labor’s policy on Israel that contradicts what most Australian Jews want; the community is just uncomfortable with the timing. Yes, many of us would prefer Australia’s endorsement of a Palestinian state to wait until there are Palestinian leaders who accept Israel’s right to live in peace and security, but asked if we support a Palestinian sovereignty over the territories, many Jewish Australians – and many Israelis – would land in the same place the ALP has already gone. 

Faced with the horror of Hamas, we can get so tied up in our self-righteousness that we also forget that it makes no difference to the prospects for peace how Australia votes at the UN or the language our politicians use about Israel.  

Those who argue Jews must vote Liberal because of Labor’s Israel policy are effectively removing the right of Australian Jews to cast their votes on the many policies that affect their lives and the society in which they live, in favour of casting a symbolic but pointless ballot.  

Some argue that the ALP’s policy is an indication of hostility to Israel which has a direct relationship to the rise in antisemitism. This is a contention that can't be substantiated or disproven but it fails the basic test of correlation and causation. Antisemitism has risen around the world, as much in the US with its continuing support of Israel as in Europe, which tends to support Palestine.  

For the significant percentage of Jewish voters in the Melbourne electorate of Macnamara, there is also a strategic reason to reject the pressure to lodge a protest vote for the Liberals. A swing towards the Liberals by Macnamara’s 12% of Jewish voters will not deliver a Liberal victory but could lead to a preference flow that results in a Greens MP. If Jewish Liberal voters remove Josh Burns, the key Jewish community voice in the ALP, in favour of Greens candidate Sonya Semmens they will not be achieving what they intended. 

Foreign policy for a middle power on the other side of the world is a very small part of government. Antisemitism is more important, not least because Jews are the canary in the coal mine of social cohesion. 

But all Jewish voters should be thinking more broadly than Israel or antisemitism in casting their ballots.  

Nothing in either Israel or in Australia’s antisemitism landscape will be significantly different whether Australia’s next prime minister is Anthony Albanese or Peter Dutton. We should not allow obsession with these issues to rob us of our rights to vote as Australians, on all the policies that affect us.

You might also like
  • ‘Israel is systemically eliminating Palestinian collective life’:  B’Tselem
    Deborah Stone
  • Tame apologises – but with little grace
    Deborah Stone
  • Confronting Richard Flanagan and the myth of the Israel lobby
    Mary Garden
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    ANNIKA WELLS PRESSER
    Israel Hamas WarNewsAustralia

    No action to stop Hezbollah ally beaming antisemitic and anti-Israel content into Australia

    Michael Visontay
    Royal Commission final
    Royal CommissionNewsAustralia

    Strategies for cohesion final focus of Royal Commission hearings

    Peter Kohn 1
    neo-nazis white supremacists corowaTEST
    Royal CommissionOpinionAustralia

    Antisemitism, homophobia and a radical response to both

    Dennis Altman

About the author

The Jewish Independent

The Jewish Independent

More from the author

EditorialAustralia

Facing a new year with the knowledge life can be better

VideoLifestyle

Neurodivergence and inclusion in the Jcom

PodcastLifestyle

Finding Our Why

EditorialAustralia

We must fight Hanson’s regressive monoculturalism

Comments4

  • Avatar of Simon Krite

    Simon Krite2 May at 05:49 am

    What a load of rubbish !

    To suggest that Jewish Australians are being “sold a lie” this election & that concerns over antisemitism and foreign policy are “self-serving Liberal politicking” is not just insulting. It is a dismissal of months of trauma, silence, and political cowardice. The Jewish community hasn’t been duped. We’ve been watching, and what we’ve seen from this Labor government is nothing short of a profound failure of moral leadership.

    Did you even see what happened on Opera House steps? and the not a whisper from the party now asking us to ignore their record.This wasn’t a foreign policy issue. This was an Australian antisemitism issue, on Australian soil. And Labor failed and have continued to fail ever since.

    The Greens Are Not a Fringe Threat — They’re Labor’s Partner.

    Penny wongs UN Obsession.

    And the claim that Dutton and Albanese differ “in style, not substance” is absurd. Dutton has been unequivocal: “antisemitism is antisemitism”, whether it comes from neo-Nazis or the radical left. He has promised to deport non-citizens who incite hate against Jews. Albanese, by contrast, spent six months offering platitudes while avoiding the word “Jew” in statements on antisemitism. His refusal to call out who is driving this hatred – largely Islamist activists and radical left agitators is an act of cowardice, not statesmanship.

    No serious voice is saying Jewish Australians should vote on Israel alone. But the idea that we are at fault for raising legitimate concerns is manipulative. Jewish voters are not monolithic, but we are allowed to draw lines.

    This election is not about abandoning our Australian identity – it’s about protecting it. Because no cost-of-living policy, energy plan, or economic vision is worth a society where Jewish Australians are shouted down, excluded, or worse — gaslit into silence.

    We are not voting in fear. We are voting with our eyes wide open. We cant unsee the pathetic way this Labor government have equivocate on the issue of Antisemitism.

  • Avatar of Corinne

    Corinne1 May at 08:48 am

    Thanks for that wise and tempered article. Australia won’t change the world political stage as regards Israel one bit. There are many important issues that affect us in Australia as citizens here.

  • Avatar of Alan Slade

    Alan Slade1 May at 08:05 am

    Further to my previous post, the statement “Some argue that the ALP’s policy is an indication of hostility to Israel which has a direct relationship to the rise in antisemitism….. is a contention that can’t be substantiated or disproven but it fails the basic test of correlation and causation” ignores that fact that the majority of non-involved Australians do not differentiate between Jews and Israelis or between Palestinians and Muslims. Furthermore, that not one person involved in the disgraceful Sydney Opera House “protest”, happening days before any Israeli reaction, has been prosecuted, is proof of the link between anti-Israel and antisemitism in our general population.

  • Avatar of Alan Slade

    Alan Slade1 May at 07:53 am

    The statement “There is not a significant difference between the major parties’ policies on antisemitism, and the differences in foreign policy are neither substantive nor impactful” is patently and provable incorrect. The Labor Party’s voting record in the UN with respect to Israel, which broke 75 years of bipartisan foreign policy towards Israel can only be described as “substantive” and “impactful”.