Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
OpinionAustraliaZedi

To act against communal interests is to be an ‘anti-Jew’ Jew

In accusing the Jewish Council of Australia spokesperson Sarah Schwartz of being ‘anti-Jew’, Lillian Kline was articulating the harm of her work to the Jewish community. 
Hannah Lundberg
Print this
Anti-Zionist

Image: TJI

Published: 11 February 2026

Last updated: 17 February 2026

This article is part of a debate. Read There is no such thing as an ‘anti-Jew’ Jew by Nomi Kaltmann.

I know how it feels to have your Jewish belonging questioned over politics.

I've been called "self-hating" for refusing to align with Netanyahu's government, told that criticising Israeli policy makes me a traitor to my people, and called a kapo for thinking Peter Dutton was not, in fact, the saviour of Australian Jews.

So, I understand why Nomi Kaltmann reacted so strongly when Lillian Kline called Sarah Schwartz  an “anti-Jew” Jew on ABC Radio.

Schwartz is Executive Officer of the Jewish Council of Australia, an organisation that describes itself as “an independent expert Jewish voice supporting human rights and opposing antisemitism and racism” but whose public statements focus overwhelmingly on criticising Israel and opposing actions against antisemitism supported by the mainstream community. 

She has opposed the visit of Israel’s president to Australia, called for new hate speech laws to be paused, and argued against the implementation of the recommendations of the Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism.

Her Jewish identity lends legitimacy to positions that, coming from non-Jews, would more readily be recognised as dismissive of Jewish safety concerns

The Council this week published a list of signatories opposing Herzog visit, some of which turned out to be fabricated, including names of known kapos from the Holocaust, a name meaning “ass licker” in Hebrew, and the unauthorised name of a United Israel Appeal President, David Slade. 

Kaltmann argued powerfully that none of these positions mean Schwartz is an “anti-Jew” because the principle of Ahavat Yisrael (loving one’s fellow Jew) requires that no Jew be cast out of the Jewish people for their political views. Her argument is moving and fundamentally sound. 

But in calling Schwartz “anti-Jew”, I don't believe Kline was denying Schwartz her right to belong to the Jewish people. You can be part of a tribe and still do things that are opposed to the best interests or wishes of the group. 

There's space between unconditional belonging and unconditional endorsement. A worker can advocate a position that is “anti-worker’; a woman can take a stand most women consider “anti-women”.

When Kaltmann heard "anti-Jew," it appears she heard an accusation that Schwartz had forfeited her Jewish identity, that she stands outside the Jewish people. She is absolutely right that this would be an un-Jewish accusation.

But that's not what I think Kline was saying. I interpreted her as saying that Schwartz's work is opposed to ("anti") the interests, safety, and wellbeing of Jews as a collective. Not that Sarah Schwartz isn't a Jew, but that her work operates against Jewish interests. This isn't about her soul, it's about her role.

Sarah Schwartz is chosen regularly by media outlets to be a Jewish voice, when they want a Jewish perspective that runs counter to what the vast majority of our community is saying. She's platformed not despite being at odds with mainstream Jewish concerns, but because of it. Her Jewish identity lends legitimacy to positions that, coming from non-Jews, would more readily be recognised as dismissive of Jewish safety concerns. 

There's space within the framework of Ahavat Yisrael to recognise that someone can be fully Jewish and be acting in a way that disregards or damages the majority of Australian Jews

She leads an organisation that positions itself as representing a Jewish perspective in Australian public discourse, while consistently aligning with narratives that delegitimise Jewish concerns about antisemitism, minimise Jewish trauma, and provide cover for those who would see us harmed. 

In leveraging their Jewish identity to lend credibility to positions that would otherwise be recognised as hostile to Jewish collective interests, the Jewish Council of Australia functions as an inoculation against charges of antisemitism. 

Schwartz has stated publicly that her activism comes from love. Maybe it does. But what does that love actually look like in practice? Does it include concern for the Jewish children who need armed guards at their schools? Solidarity with Jewish students being isolated on campuses? Grappling with the fact Australian Jews feel endangered as never before? 

Or does it look like dismissing those concerns as political manipulation? Choosing activist partners who are consistently hostile to Israel? Providing the language and legitimacy that lets others ignore Jewish fear?

You can claim love all you want. But love without regard is hollow. Love that dismisses the fears of your community and provides cover for those who would paint Jewish concerns as manufactured hysteria, that's not love as I understand it. 

There's space within the framework of Ahavat Yisrael to recognise that someone can be fully Jewish and be acting in a way that disregards or damages the majority of Australian Jews. That’s what I think Kline meant by “anti-Jew”.

Judaism also contains the principle of tochacha (rebuke), which requires us to call out wrongdoing in our own household. In naming the harm Schwartz is doing to the Jewish community, Kline is acting in accordance with that principle. 

We are living in a time of extraordinary strain for Jewish communities worldwide. Antisemitism is rising. Jews report feeling less safe than they have in decades. The need for communal solidarity and clear advocacy has never been greater.

I don't question Sarah Schwartz's soul. But I do question her judgment about the impact of her work on our community. And I can do that while still holding fast to the principle that she remains part of this ancient, complicated, miraculous people.

You might also like
  • Traditional antisemitic myths dominate online antisemitism: new study
    Deborah Stone
  • When security clashes with hospitality
    Jarod Rhine-Davis
  • Legendary magicians who made their Jewish identities disappear
    Nina Siegal
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Isabelle oderberg
    NewsAustralia

    ‘The Jewish Independent’ commentary makes finals in Walkley journalism awards

    The Jewish Independent 1
    Nadia
    ReflectionAustralia

    Between communities: finding Jewish belonging after migration

    Florencia Tuchin
    Jewish cemetery
    NewsAustralia

    Melbourne Chevra Kadisha implicitly recognises LGBTQ+ families

    Jarod Rhine-Davis 1

About the author

Hannah Lundberg

Hannah Lundberg

Hannah Lundberg is The Jewish Independent's social media manager.

More from the author

ReflectionLifestyle

Ten ways to reflect, repair and renew this Yom Kippur

ReflectionAustralia

After Bondi: Reconnecting with nature through Jewish tradition

VideoArts & Culture

Adass fire meets election in pop-up exhibition