Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
DebateAustraliaLifestyle

There is no such thing as an ‘anti-Jew’ Jew

I do not agree with them, but the claim that anti-Zionist Jews are not part of the Jewish people is a betrayal of a basic principle of Jewish thinking.
Nomi Kaltmann
Print this
Jewish diversity

Image: TJI

Published: 6 February 2026

Last updated: 17 February 2026

This article is a part of a debate. Read To act against communal interests is to be an 'anti-Jew' Jew by Hannah Chester.

I have never met Sarah Schwartz from the Jewish Council of Australia. I suspect that if we sat down together, we would disagree on most things relating to the Israeli Palestinian conflict. But like all Jews, she is part of my people.

That is why I was horrified when Lillian Klein debated her on ABC and accused of being an “anti-Jew” because of her political views.

"Sarah might be a Jew but she is an anti-Jew whose views are not reflective or representative of the mainstream Jewish community here in Australia." - Lillian Kline, speaking of Jewish Council of Australia EO Sarah Schwartz on ABC Radio

I want to be clear. I am an Orthodox Jew and a Zionist, and my politics are not Sarah's. But I would never, ever hurl that accusation at a fellow Jew, and trust me it’s not because I am too polite or too conflict averse. But rather, because Judaism itself does not allow it.

At the core of Jewish life sits a principle that is both deceptively simple and brutally demanding: Ahavat Yisrael. Love for a fellow Jew.

There are no ideological entrance exams to being a Jew and no political loyalty oaths

In Jewish tradition, every Jew, religious or secular, Zionist or anti-Zionist, left wing or right wing, lactose tolerant or deeply lactose intolerant, possesses a Neshama, a soul. A literal spark of the Divine.

Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi, the founder of the Chabad movement, teaches that every Jew has a nefesh Elokit, a Godly soul, that is one and indivisible at its source. Because all Jewish souls share this single Divine root, we are commanded to love other Jews based on their essence, not their behaviour or temperament or politics. Love is not contingent on how palatable someone is to us, and it is certainly not earned by ideological alignment. Rather, it is demanded precisely when those things are absent.

This is where Ahavat Yisrael becomes uncomfortable. It is easy to love Jews who look like us, think like us, vote like us, and make us feel morally affirmed. It is much harder to love Jews who unsettle us, embarrass us, anger us, or articulate positions we believe are deeply wrong. But the mitzvah does not ask us only to love our fellow Jews when it feels easy.

I do not always find Ahavat Yisrael easy. I am human. I have certainly had my share of arguments, and over the years I have fallen out with people. I have been hurt and I have hurt others. But beneath all of that, I try to hold onto a deeper discipline. To remember that beneath the very real disagreements, that between all Jews there is a shared essence that does not disappear simply because I am uncomfortable.

In the immediate aftermath of October 7, I found myself in multiple WhatsApp chats where emotions were raw, and lines were being drawn quickly and aggressively. In one of those chats, someone suggested that anti-Zionist Jews were “not part of the Jewish people”.

I physically shuddered when I read that. In my 33 years on this earth, I cannot recall encountering a statement so bone-chillingly inaccurate according to Jewish tradition.

This is not how Judaism has ever worked. You are Jewish because you are born Jewish, or because you convert sincerely according to Jewish law. And that’s where the litmus testing stops. There are no ideological entrance exams to being a Jew and no political loyalty oaths.

Once you are Jewish, you are Jewish. We do not believe you can opt out. We do not believe you can revoke your membership. Even Jews who convert to another religion are still regarded, painfully and paradoxically, as Jews. That has been the position of Jewish law for thousands of years.

The attempt to redraw the boundaries of Jewish belonging based according to political positions is profoundly un-Jewish.

The Lubavitcher Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, one of the most influential Jewish leaders of the twentieth century, understood this deeply. In 1976, he launched a campaign identifying Ahavat Yisrael as one of the core mitzvot that should shape Jewish daily life. He emphasised that this love must extend across every divide: age, observance, affiliation, and ideology. It was not solely reserved for those Jews that were likeable. The Rebbe emphasised that Ahavat Yisrael was a spiritual obligation precisely because it ran against human instinct.

The point of Ahavat Yisrael is not to flatten difference, it is to insist that difference does not dissolve belonging

I take the Rebbe’s teachings seriously. That is why I can say, without hesitation, that accusing a fellow Jew of being “an anti-Jew” because of their political views crosses a line. You can argue and you can criticise their positions. Judaism has never been afraid of disagreement, heck, we wrote the Talmud which is basically hundreds of pages of arguments. We have built an entire civilisation on argument.

This is not a claim that only other Jews deserve respect. Absolutely not. Judaism insists on the dignity of all human beings, insisting that all humans are created b’tzelem Elokim, in the image of God. People do not need to be Jewish to deserve respect. Ahavat Yisrael is not about superiority, it is about obligation. Precisely because Jews are bound to one another by a shared covenant and, in mystical language, a shared neshama, the ethical demand is heavier, not lighter.

As Jews, we are exceptionally good at fighting each other. History suggests this is not a new skill. But when our internal battles begin to fracture our most basic commitments to one another, something essential is lost. The point of Ahavat Yisrael is not to flatten difference, it is to insist that difference does not dissolve belonging.

Sarah Schwartz is a Jew. I am a Jew. We do not need to agree on our politics for that to remain true. We are part of the same people, the same stubborn, fractious, enduring tribe. And if we cannot hold that line, especially now, then we have misunderstood something fundamental about who we as the Jewish people are.

You might also like
  • No action to stop Hezbollah ally beaming antisemitic and anti-Israel content into Australia
    Michael Visontay
  • Rachel Moshel: Creating a space for Jewish art and joy
    Gideon Cohen
  • Safety not just security: the last word to the Royal Commission
    Yehoram Ulman
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    original-6ACA4B6A-4208-4277-A4EE-E687C3C87523
    FeatureLifestyle

    The right to an ordinary Jewish life

    Jarod Rhine-Davis
    Albanese Bondi
    Royal CommissionAnalysisAustralia

    Prime minister’s absence exposes weakness in Royal Commission hearings

    Michael Visontay
    Commissioner Virginia Bell
    Royal CommissionAnalysisAustralia

    Now is the time for the Royal Commission to deliver, not be politicised

    Dean Sherr 2

About the author

Nomi Kaltmann

Nomi Kaltmann

Nomi Kaltmann is an Australian lawyer and journalist. Her writing has appeared in major Australian and international publications including Crikey, Griffith Review, Mamamia, Tablet Magazine, The Australian Financial Review, The Daily Beast, The Forward, The Guardian, The Jewish Telegraphic Agency and The Spectator. She regularly appears on radio and podcasts to discuss Australia’s Jewish community, including NPR (USA), CBC (Canada), LBC (London), Call Me Back, Unholy: Two Jews on the News, SBS and The Times of Israel. An influential Orthodox feminist leader and founding president of the Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance (JOFA Australia), she is a sought-after speaker on religion, interfaith and contemporary Jewish life.

More from the author

OpinionAustralia

Cancellation backfires but we are at it again

OpinionWorld

From NY to Melbourne, local politicians are whipping up hate 

ReflectionAustralia

I have lost faith in our multicultural institutions 

InterviewIsrael

Dreams, nightmares and realities from a bereaved mother 

Comments14

  • Avatar of Andrew W

    Andrew W12 July at 08:51 am

    The idea that it’s not possible for one to put herself outside the boundaries of the Jewish community strikes me a historically false. The cherem existed for a reason.

  • Avatar of Jack

    Jack10 March at 04:19 am

    Seven days after Hamas’ attack, we had a referendum in Australia. The no case was fronted by Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Warren Mundine, two First Nations people. They were entitled to their opinion. What they were not entitled to do and did not do was pretend they represented anything but a tiny minority of First Nations Australians.

  • Avatar of Rafael Bierig Erlich

    Rafael Bierig Erlich15 February at 01:35 am

    Similar to Chester, I also do not align with the current Israeli government and cringe at the notion of Dutton being portrayed as saviour of Australian Jews. As such, I am definitively not represented by the main Jewish peak bodies who insist on portraying our community as a homogeneous group of individuals fully supportive of the current Israeli government. This could not be further away from reality. In fact, I regularly have to spend a significant amount of time explaining to non-Jews in my social and professional circle that no, not all of us are supportive of Bibi and friends. I also do not fully align with JCA’s position, but it is great to see their efforts to increase their share of voice and bring broader visibility to our plurality. To state that JCA positions are hostile to ‘Jewish collective interests’ takes us once again to that narrative of homogeneity across the community which is in my view a misrepresentation of reality.
    In this context, it was great to read Kaltmann’s article and be reassured that some members from the Jewish orthodox community can understand this plurality. That we can agree to disagree amongst us without being labelled an anti-Jew.

  • Avatar of Dawn Cohen

Dawn Cohen14 February at 10:11 pm

Jewish Council of Australia is immoral because:
1. It chooses a name designed to misrepresent itself as representative of most Jews and leverages that lie, exploiting the Australian people repeatedly
2. It may say it is “ non-Zionist” and may present more nuanced perspective in Altman’s article in the JI, but to the general Australian public it consistently aligns with antizionist messaging, has not done one thing to stop the persecution of Jews on the left eho refuse to meet the criteria of antizionism, and repeatedly dismissies antisemitism in Australia and therefore has emboldened it.

It is therefore immoral to be a member of JCA. An organization with leadership that deliberately misrepresents truth, as Adler has in saying the objections to the antisemitism in the Adelaide writers festival were just about the anti-Zionist hatred of the Writer being Palestinian.

JCA members are personally responsible for these lies, the emboldening of antisemitism in Australia that is consequent.

  • Avatar of Simon Krite

    Simon Krite12 February at 11:44 pm

    The problem with this piece is it hides a political argument inside a sermon about love.

    Nobody claimed a Jew stops being a Jew because of their views. That’s a strawman. The real issue is whether a Jew can promote positions that damage Jewish safety, legitimacy and self-determination and then demand immunity from criticism under the banner of Ahavat Yisrael.

    Love is not endorsement and belonging is not protection from accountability.

    Kaltmann condemns “boundary drawing” while defending activists who constantly draw boundaries themselves, labelling mainstream Jewish institutions immoral, illegitimate or unethical. Ideological lines are unacceptable only when the community pushes back.

    You can’t legitimately amplify narratives to target Jews, empower movements that deny Jewish sovereignty, and then retreat into spiritual language when confronted. Pathetic double speak.

    Kaltmann wants a one-way obligation. Zionists must speak gently, anti-Zionists may act politically without communal response.

    You remain part of the people.
    But you do not get to harm the people and dictate how quietly they object.

  • Avatar of Helen Rosenbaum

    Helen Rosenbaum12 February at 11:06 pm

    The JCA describes itself as non-zionist not anti-zionist. For this reason I am comfortable to be a supporter. I have been described as a self-hating Jew. I am pro-peace and fervently desire human rights for both Jews and Palestinians. JCA’s values and principles (see their website) align with this. I believe they also align with the core Jewish principles described by Nomi in this great article. We are all Jewish and I am proud of Jewish values.

  • Avatar of Dawn Cohen

    Dawn Cohen12 February at 09:02 am

    Naming the internalized antisemitism in antizionist activist Jews ( as opposed to non -Zionist, or strongly criticism of Israeli government Jews) is not denying their Jewishness or the presence or holiness of their soul, their Jewish Soul. It does not mean turning away from honouring that holiness, or turning away from loving them as part of the Jewish family. In fact naming the antisemitism without being abusive is the responsible thing to do. oppressed groups receive massive social reward and inner soothing through undermining the interests of their own: women in Afghanistan, Iran and even Australia are encouraged to police other women; historically gay people have put down other homosexuals to take the heat off themselves. Some Middle Ages antisemitism was initiated by Jews socially coerced into Christianity. The psychological term for this phenomenon is “ identification with the aggressor”. The person does not experience it at all like internalized oppression. They think they are, in fact, extra moral for putting the needs of the other first. From the inside It feels honourable, free -thinking and brave. There could not be significant antisemitism in the Australian left without its proactive minimisation and denial by antizionist activist Jews.

  • Avatar of Mary Kery

    Mary Kery12 February at 06:29 am

    Thankyou for reminding me about Ahavat Yisrael.
    However if we are to do no harm(even indirect) to our fellow Jews I think Sara should express her views as an dividual not representing a “major” group because this just confirms to many Jew/Israeli haters their feelings are acceptable & legitimate.

  • Avatar of jg

    jg10 February at 06:32 am

    Criticism of Israeli government policy is legitimate. However, antizionism, where it entails denying Israel’s right to exist, is incompatible with a two-state solution, which by definition affirms Israel as a sovereign Jewish state alongside a sovereign Islamic Palestinian state. If Israel’s right to exist is disavowed, Israel cannot be one of the two states, and the political outcome implied is therefore post-Israel rather than two-state. When this rejection of Jewish self-determination is combined with the acceptance or neglect of nationalist and exclusionary regimes elsewhere in the region, it cannot credibly be framed as a neutral human-rights position; it reflects a selective moral framework in which Jews alone are denied a right routinely recognised for others.

  • Avatar of Simonne W

    Simonne W8 February at 12:26 pm

    Sarah Schwartz identifies as antizionist, and her views sit well outside those held by the majority of the mainstream Jewish community in Australia. The JCA works alongside activist networks such as APAN, positioning themselves as Jewish voices within those movements. Yet most Jewish Australians do not see them as representative of their lived reality, concerns, or sense of communal responsibility. These voices are often elevated in public discourse in ways that lend legitimacy to antizionist campaigns, while the experiences and perspectives of the broader Jewish community are sidelined or dismissed. When Lilian described Sarah as an anti-Jew, it reflected the real pain and fear felt by many Jews who experience attacks on Israel and Zionism as attacks on their identity, safety, and collective history. From a secular Jewish perspective, this conversation is not about questioning anyone’s Jewishness in a religious sense. It is about the responsibility we have to one another as a community, to stand against harm directed at Jews, and to consider how public positions impact the safety, cohesion, and wellbeing of Jewish life. What I find striking, Nomi, is the energy spent debating this framing rather than confronting those driving hostility toward our community right now.

  • Avatar of Concerned

    Concerned8 February at 12:03 am

    perhaps anti-Zionism is not the same as antizionism because one was a conversation involving jews and the latter is about the elimination of the Jewish state?

  • Avatar of Andy Alcock

    Andy Alcock7 February at 10:33 am

    I think your support for the right of Sarah Schwartz to criticise the crimes of Israel against the Palestinian people & not claim she is not a Jew.

    What I don’t understand though is why you seem content to say that you are a Zionist.
    Palestinians have endured genocide & ethnic cleansing for decades.

    When Albert Einstein saw how Zionist settlers were treating Palestinians in 1923, he stopped calling himself a Zionist. He also said that the tactics of the Irgun Zionist terrorist gang were no different to those of the Nazis & the fascists.

    He was a progressive & “righteous” Jew who worked for peace & equality.

  • Avatar of RALPH Renard

    RALPH Renard7 February at 01:32 am

    A brilliant and sobering article to be read and observed by all.

  • Avatar of Judy

    Judy6 February at 04:38 pm

    “At the core of Jewish life sits a principle that is both deceptively simple and brutally demanding: Love for a fellow Jew.”

    Thank you, Nomi, for reminding us.

    “I would never, ever hurl that accusation at a fellow Jew, and trust me it’s not because I am too polite or too conflict averse. But rather, because Judaism itself does not allow it.”

    Smiles of agreement: I sure wish we-all would remember that being polite, honourable, and respectful are “Jewish things” – and human things – we-all should value and practice more often than we do.

    In response to the recent Invasion Day terror / hate crime against First Peoples in WA (Perth), Senator McCarthy said: “We need to look out for one another. We need to care for one another. We need to be kinder to one another.”

    May we remember Senator McCarthy’s and Nomi Kaltmann’s messages, especially when it is most difficult to do so, and extend the Jewish principle to all people, everywhere, always, all ways: lead with kindness, honour, and respect to all, whether Jewish or not.

    Peace, Judy