Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
Israel Hamas WarOpinionAustralia

The failure of the Australian Human Rights Commission’s racism project

The Seen and Heard project ignores several reports into antisemitism, misrepresents the realities of racism and alienates the communities it claims to support.
Esther Takac
Print this
Woman wearing a keffiyeh holds up a sign reading "Jews are Safe, Zionists are uncomfortable, spot the difference".

A protester supporting Palestinians in Gaza during a rally at The University of Sydney in May 2024 (Image: REUTERS/Lewis Jackson via AAP).

Published: 22 July 2025

Last updated: 22 July 2025

In shocking incidents recently, a synagogue in East Melbourne was firebombed and a mob stormed an Israeli restaurant in the CBD. They were aimed at terrifying the Jewish community and targeting people simply because of their faith.

There is a federal government body tasked with documenting such effects of racism and discrimination on Jewish and Muslim communities after October 7 – the Australian Human Rights Commission’s (AHRC) Seen and Heard project.

Launched after October 7, 2023, and funded by the Department of Home Affairs, this two-million-dollar initiative promised to listen to affected communities and translate those insights into meaningful anti-racism interventions. Australians of all backgrounds should be proud such a commission has been established to monitor our multicultural society.

But do I think the recent antisemitic attacks will be documented by Seen and Heard? Do I think the project will develop any meaningful anti-racism interventions? I very much doubt it.

Reasons for pessimism

Let me wind back a few steps and explain my pessimism. As a child and adult psychologist, I’ve spent much of my professional life listening to stories of pain, trauma, and resilience. Since October 7 and the war in Gaza, the impact of trauma on individuals and communities has been immense. Sadly, the discourse around this trauma has often been polarised – with so many people unable to see and feel compassion for the pain on the other side. 

Alongside my work as a psychologist, I’m also a filmmaker and author. My recent documentary, The Narrow Bridge (2022), follows four bereaved Israelis and Palestinians who lost a child or parent in the ongoing conflict. But instead of choosing hate, these people, and many like them, transformed their searing grief into peace activism. Their journeys show how healing and progress are possible when we truly listen to the pain of both sides and strive for compromise and balance, even in the most fraught conflicts.

It was with this commitment to reducing trauma and nurturing empathy and balance that, when approached by Seen and Heard, I agreed to be interviewed.

Initially, I was heartened by the project’s goals. During my extended interview, I spoke about my experiences: I was doxed and called a “baby-killing Zionist,” I received threats to my psychology practice, and intimidation about The Narrow Bridge. Sadly, these experiences are not unique; many in the Jewish community now live with a heightened sense of vulnerability.

But my optimism faded, to be replaced by significant disappointment and lack of trust. The Seen and Heard website presents data in a way that is unbalanced and misleading.

As we all know, presentation shapes perception. The website presents three separate categories for anti-Palestinian racism, Islamophobia, and anti-Arab racism, while antisemitism is listed as a single category. There is no category documenting the racism targeting the Israeli community numbering in the tens of thousands (such as the restaurant mobbed in the CBD, another Melbourne Israeli restaurant forced to close down due to intimidation).

Misinforming impressions

This structure creates a strong and misinforming impression that the impact on Arab, Muslim, and Palestinian communities is far greater than on the Jewish community – anyone visiting the site would reasonably conclude that Jewish Australians are far less affected by hate than these other communities. This is not only inaccurate – it is a distortion of the reality on the ground.

Most Australians are aware of well-documented antisemitic attacks such as the firebombing of the Adass synagogue in Melbourne, the vandalising of a Sydney childcare centre, the ‘Jew Die’ graffiti on the walls of a Melbourne Jewish school, the smashing of Josh Burns’ electoral office, the Bankstown nurses vowing to kill Israeli patients. We can now add to this list the firebombing of the synagogue in East Melbourne and the violent targeting of the Israeli restaurant Miznon in Melbourne’s CBD.

But beyond these headlines, there are many Jewish Australians who have experienced racism and discrimination to the extent it has significantly damaged businesses, professions and particularly careers as creatives.

Furthermore, Jewish students and academics at a range of universities have faced intimidation, harassment, and even physical threats on campus. In some situations, this has resulted in evacuations and the need for security – such as the well-documented case of Professor Prawer at Melbourne University.

Here are three concerning reports issued recently regarding anti-Jewish hate in Australia that I would have expected Seen and Heard to refer to in their work. 

A recent report by the Australian Academic Alliance Against Antisemitism (a network of academics from 32 Australian universities) found that 67% of Jewish students and staff reported experiences of antisemitism that had a significant impact on their lives. Indeed, only a third of students and staff felt physically safe on campus.

It is interesting to note that these results mirrored the recently released results of an investigation into antisemitism at Harvard University in the US. Whilst the Harvard report had significant media coverage in the US, the Australian report received hardly any coverage — if it received any coverage at all — on the ABC or in the Nine newspapers.

Since October 7, anti-Jewish attacks in Australia have more than quadrupled, with more than 2,000 incidents recorded in the past year. A recent report Turning Point: The Victorian Jewish Community After October 7, released by the Jewish Community Council of Victoria (JCCV) describes the effects on the community.

Jewish Victorians said they were either excluded from public life or voluntarily retreated in order to avoid harassment and racial targeting. Many reported post-traumatic symptoms and a high level of personal strain. There has been a need for increased security at a wide range of Jewish schools, synagogues, arts festivals, even memorial events.

Moreover, there has been a tidal wave of hatred against Jewish people on social media. Reports from the Online Hate Prevention Institute shows a 539% increase in online antisemitism and a dramatic rise in incitement to violence against Jews since October 7.

Reports on antisemitism ignored

Although Seen and Heard claims to be documenting antisemitism, the above three reports are very concerning but do not seem to have been incorporated in their findings.  

Instead, its section on antisemitism is so vague as to be virtually meaningless (with statements such as “Some Jewish community members highlighted that anti-racism efforts often overlook the unique aspects of antisemitism…“).

The project has engaged in a woke form of equivalence regarding anti-Jewish hate, such that it is unable to document and denounce this growing form of hatred without ritually suggesting an equivalence with Islamophobia and other forms.

This is in stark contrast to a recent New York Times article which compares the hate crimes in 2023 in the US against a range of demographic groups. Research found that anti-Jewish hate crimes number 291 per million people, whilst anti-LGBTQ+ crimes number 111, anti-Muslim number 79 and anti-Black number 64 per million. In contrast to Seen and Heard’s whataboutism, the article clearly states that the US is experiencing its worst surge of anti-Jewish hate in decades. 

The AHRC has failed to document anti-Jewish hate clearly and unequivocally. What this represents is a denial of the experience of the vast majority of Australian Jews. If Seen and Heard can’t even document the incidents of racism reliably, I fail to see how it will develop meaningful anti-racism interventions to deal with these issues.

I gave extended feedback to Seen and Heard about my concerns. It took the Commission about six weeks to respond but no actions have been taken to address these concerns.

Australia deserves better than a two-million-dollar project that risks misleading the public and wasting taxpayer money. Rather than building social cohesion, Seen and Heard is dangerous because it misrepresents the realities of racism, undermines trust and alienates the very communities it claims to support.

In a time of rising polarisation and hate, this kind of selective hearing is not just disappointing, it is unacceptable. Now more than ever we need institutions that uphold the values of integrity and empathy for our multicultural society.

POSTSCRIPT

An abridged version of this article was previously published in The Australian. Before publication, I contacted the Director of Seen and Heard to explain that, as my concerns had not been addressed, I was going ahead with the article. In response, I was informed that the issues I raised had been brought to the attention of the Race Discrimination Commissioner, Giridharan Sivaraman, who then convened a Zoom meeting with me. He was joined by two others, including the Commission’s media adviser.

I felt they listened attentively as I outlined my concerns, including several recent personal examples of antisemitism. The media adviser asked whether the Commission could provide a formal response to be included in the forthcoming article, and I agreed.

Their written response largely restated the goals of Seen and Heard, noting that it is designed not to monitor or report incidents of racism in a quantitative sense, but to gather qualitative understanding of experiences of racism, including antisemitism and Islamophobia.

I asked why the project could not include both quantitative and qualitative data, particularly when quantitative reports on antisemitism already exist. I also expressed concern that the project, in its current form, does not adequately reflect the qualitative experience of antisemitism as it is felt by many Australian Jews.

That said, I do believe the Commission has taken the feedback seriously. The media adviser’s response included the following: “The Commission collects feedback on the project’s consultation process and always looks to improve where it can. The Commissioner also confirmed that the current content on the project’s webpage was developed in early 2025 to describe the initial consultation phase.

"The webpage is now being updated to provide more detail about the project’s next phase and to better align with community feedback about how experiences of racism are described.”

It will be important to see whether the revised content meaningfully addresses the concerns raised by many in the Jewish community.

You might also like
  • Sydney Uni commissions independent review after ‘Globalise the Intifada’ campaign
    Deborah Stone
  • New evidence points to Iranian responsibility for Diaspora antisemitic attacks
    Colin Shindler
  • How not to apologise
    Zac Klugman
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    bialik Jewish schools shabbat
    OpinionAustralia

    Jewish schools are the marinade that infuses continuity

    Jeremy Stowe-Lindner
    Jewish cemetery
    NewsAustralia

    Melbourne Chevra Kadisha implicitly recognises LGBTQ+ families

    Jarod Rhine-Davis 1
    antisemitism online
    NewsAustralia

    Proposed digital care law to offer protection against online antisemitism

    Deborah Stone

About the author

Esther Takac

Esther Takac

Esther Takac is an award-winning filmmaker and author, and a child and adult psychologist. Her recent film The Narrow Bridge screened at more than 35 international film festivals and on TV stations in Europe, Australia and New Zealand. Her upcoming film Rising tells the stories of the courageous Israelis rising beyond trauma to fight for democracy, healing and their homeland’s soul. Esther is a delegate with Hatikvah Australia for the upcoming World Zionist Congress, advocating for a strong, democratic, pluralistic, inclusive, and socially just Israel, with a commitment to directing funds toward rebuilding communities in the South and North.

More from the author

OpinionIsrael

The leadership a wounded society needs

OpinionIsrael

The question is not whether we support Israel, but which Israel?

ReflectionLifestyle

Trauma, triggers and our need to remember