Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
InterviewAustraliaIsrael

Israel’s new ambassador to Australia: a man with a tough job

No ambassador has arrived into a more strained Australia-Israel relationship than Dr Hillel Newman
Deborah Stone
Print this
Ambassador Hillel Newman

Israel’s new Ambassador to Australia Dr Hillel Newman (Deborah Stone)

Published: 28 May 2026

Last updated: 28 May 2026

It’s been a demanding week for Israel’s new ambassador to Australia Hillel Newman. Barely three months into the job, he’s been called in by Foreign Minister Penny Wong to give account of the “disgraceful” (his word) taunting of Gaza flotilla activists by Israeli cabinet minister Itamar Ben-Gvir.

He also has to deal with Australia’s decision to join a multilateral statement condemning the expansion of settlements and settler violence in the West Bank, violence describes this week as "brutal" by Israel's president.

But such crises are not going to ruffle a professional diplomat. “Just about every week seems to be a demanding week,” he says calmly, when I open our conversation referring to recent challenges.

“It was more than usual because of the flotilla and the event with Ben-Gvir. Everything explodes beyond its proportion in context with Israel. Ben-Gvir behaved in a way that he shouldn't, and he humiliated the flotilla, but when they landed in Spain, they were beaten with batons and undressed forcefully, because they caused unrest in the airport, and you should see what they did to them there, and no one talks about that.”

And we’re off. The time stamp stands at 30 seconds and already Ambassador Newman has smoothly segued into a well-worn diplomatic talking point: the double standards faced by Israel.

“I can understand the reaction of Australia,” he adds, “because even Israel reacted. The foreign minister of Israel, the prime minister, the president, so there's no real gap on that issue of disgraceful behaviour of Ben-Gvir. But Ben-Gvir is just one politician, and he was condemned … by the government of Israel.”

We shouldn't take every incident ... and make it have a negative effect on the bilateral relationship

Dr Hillel Newman is a seasoned diplomat and academic with a PhD in Jewish history and past appointments in the United States and Uzbekistan. Most recently he has been a senior policy adviser in the Knesset.

He is a small, Ashkenazi-looking man – more Begin than Bibi in appearance and affect – with a modest dark kippah and an open-collared pink shirt. His English is flawless: he was born in South Africa and migrated to Israel with his family as a child.

Newman arrived in Canberra in February with his wife, who runs accounts at the embassy, and their 16-year-old son.

No ambassador has arrived into a more strained Australia-Israel context: the recognition of Palestine last year, rising antisemitism, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s attack on Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, blaming the government for the Bondi massacre.

“We've been through a difficult two years,” Newman admits. “Fundamentals are clear to both sides that we're, we should be, close allies. We share the same values. There's only one state in the Middle East that shares the same values as Australia ... freedom of the individual, freedom of speech, democracy, liberalism.”

Talking point two: Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East, I note, as Newman goes on to list the shared values of women’s rights, LGBT rights, and a multi-party system.

He segues into the shared history of the Jewish legions and the Anzacs in the “redemption and freedom from the Ottoman Empire, which paved the way for the re-establishment of the state of Israel”, neatly encompassing Australia in the Israeli narrative of 1948.

I push him back towards the present tensions and ask him why Australia, which has a longstanding bipartisan commitment to a two-state solution, should not have recognised a Palestinian state?

“Israel took very hard the fact that Australia recognised the Palestinian state, even though it didn't [make] a clear demand of reforms in the Palestinian Authority. Palestinian Authority, you know, pays terrorists with the pay for slay system. [The recognition] was in the midst of the war when Hamas had attacked Israel, and Israel was still responding. It was seen as a prize for terrorism in the fact that they recognised the state, so it set back the relations in many ways.”

If they knew what was going on, they would understand that Israel is acting in self-defence in a war that is obligated, that is forced upon Israel

He is a little more conciliatory on Australia’s condemnation of settlement expansion.

“It's legitimate to have differences of opinion. If you have a left progressive government in Australia, and you have a right-wing government in Israel, most probably you will have differences of opinion.

"Australia must also understand that there is a government in Israel, which has its own sovereignty, it has this decision-making process, it's a political process, it's a robust democracy.

"But we shouldn't take every incident like this, or any incident like this, and make it have a negative effect on the bilateral relationship.”

In regard to Netanyahu’s attack on Albanese, Newman’s approach is to hose it down and circle back to the comfortable narrative of shared values.

“Netanyahu's responses were as a result of the Bondi attack, and as a result of a feeling in Israel that antisemitism is growing in Australia, and not much activity is taken to curb it, and the recognition of a Palestinian state. So, there was a gathering of items, which caused, I would say a new level of declaration.

"I think that both sides have now had a breather and the time to think about things and return to the basic fundamental relationship and the value systems that we share.”

Rebuilding and resetting the relationship is Newman’s priority and he is keen to emphasise the positives. “Israel can bring a lot of benefits to Australia, not only in the alliance of values, but also in practical operative aspects like defence, security, innovation, health. Israel is a global leader. Just a week ago, Elon Musk … said that Israel is number one per capita in innovation in the world, so with all our challenges, which we have, Israel is still a leading factor in many aspects of benefit to Australia.”

The innovation talking point used to be a safe retreat for Israeli diplomats, but has the Boycotts, Divestments and Sanctions (BDS) movement made even commercial and cultural ties difficult?

“I don't think that they've had significant impact on the state of Israel. The boycotts have not brought about a situation where Israel has lost significant amount of in trade or something like that, but it does have an impact in the image.

"I think [it's]mainly because of the many innocent, naive people who are swept up in the movement. They're very ignorant, and they're influenced by their peers, or by, you know, over well-meaning people, but they don't understand the issues.”

Newman sees ignorant and easily swayed masses as a key issue for Israel, saying this cohort is inadvertently serving the interests of hardcore antisemites.

He also attributes increasing opposition to the Israeli government from within Diaspora communities to ignorance and popularist pressure.

“It takes courage sometimes to stand on the right side of history, and with justice. The popular trends [is] to go against Israel.

"Some people may have criticism of Israel's actions, not knowing everything and not understanding Israel's position. Sometimes also there's a lot of misinformation and disinformation out there.

"I can understand that there are such trends, and I am aware of it, but I think the vast majority of Australian Jewry is Zionistic. They understand what Israel is facing, they understand the challenges facing Israel, which is not of its own choice. The fact that our neighbours are Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria, Lebanon, not New Zealand and Fiji, right? They understand that Israel's struggle for survival is continuing.

"We didn't initiate the attack against the Hamas. They initiated on the October 7 … Israel has to defend itself.”

The line that criticism of Israel – even within Jewish communities – is all based on misunderstanding is hard to sustain. Surely, he understands that the suffering in Gaza has motivated at least some of the opposition to Israel?  

“Every innocent civilian who suffers is tragic. Israel is party to that feeling of sorrow and sympathy for anyone who is displaced or injured or anything due to a conflict … [but] no state in the world can accept a situation where its citizens have to flee to bomb shelters multiple times a day because they're attacked by rockets.

“If they knew what was going on, they would understand that Israel is acting in self-defence in a war that is obligated, that is forced upon Israel … You can't expect Israel to just sit aside and say, "Okay, we won't do anything, and they can attack again.”

Newman marshals this series of talking points – sympathy, self-defence, the steps the IDF takes to protect civilians – with complete conviction. He is clearly an excellent advocate with a mastery of Israel’s narrative.

But what of the Palestinian narrative, that Israel displaced Palestinians, that Palestinians, too, have a right to the land to the river and the sea, that people in Gaza and the West Bank are living constrained and oppressed lives? Is there not something to be gained from accepting the existence of dual narratives and striving instead for a middle ground?

“Look, of course, I'm aware of the Palestinian narrative. Doesn't mean that it's true. Israel did not displace Arabs intentionally. In fact, Israel called – you can read the Charter of Independence of Israel – Israel called for them to stay and live in peace with Israel …”

We are back to the talking points of the Israeli narrative: the self-directed flight of Palestinians in 1948, the failure of Oslo, the corruption of the Palestinian Authority, Israel's unilateral withdrawal from Gaza and the violent Palestinian response, the persistent Palestinian rejection of Israel.

“I grew up in the schooling system in Israel, and the schooling system of Israel was such that we spoke about one day there'll be peace. That was our dream. What is the dream that Palestinian children grow up on? They grow up on jihad and martyrdom and killing. You can't blame Israel for everything. You know, the accusations against Israel are endless, but Israel is not to be blamed for the fact that the Palestinians have made the wrong decisions throughout.”

Does Newman think Israeli schoolchildren still grow up with that dream of peace? Yes, he answers without hesitation.

And does he still see it as possible? “I believe it is possible, but it's conditioned that they, our so-called partners, want the same. If they are not willing to come forward with the aspiration of peace with Israel, recognise Israel, living in peace with Israel, then it won't happen.”

You might also like
  • Abuse by IDF soldiers humiliates Muslim Palestinians
    Ben Lynfield
  • Beinart takes a wrecking ball to Israel
    Michael Visontay
  • Why you should take part in the Gen26 community survey 
    Adina Bankier Karp & David Graham
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Albanese Bondi
    Royal CommissionAnalysisAustralia

    Prime minister’s absence exposes weakness in Royal Commission hearings

    Michael Visontay
    how to sell a genocide
    Israel Hamas WarOpinionAustralia

    Cancellation backfires but we are at it again

    Nomi Kaltmann 1
    Commissioner Virginia Bell
    Royal CommissionAnalysisAustralia

    Now is the time for the Royal Commission to deliver, not be politicised

    Dean Sherr 2

About the author

Deborah Stone

Deborah Stone

Deborah Stone is Editor-in-Chief of TJI. She has more than 30 years experience as a journalist and editor, including as a reporter and feature writer on The Age and The Sunday Age, as Editor of the Australian Jewish News and as Editor of ArtsHub.

More from the author

NewsAustralia

Humanitarian organisations fail on antisemitism: new research

NewsAustralia

AJN pulls article criticising abuse of Sarah Schwartz

NewsIsrael

Israel leads use of military AI: a threat to global peace

NewsAustralia

NSW government marks six months since Bondi with $8.3 million in community support

Comments1

  • Avatar of Pauline Grodski

    Pauline Grodski29 May at 06:07 am

    There was a snide tone to your article. What tone do you expect the ambassador to take? He is a diplomat and what he had to say seemed fair enough to me. Perhaps your questions needed to be more incisive to elicit a more controversial conversation.