Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenWorld
NewsWorld

Traditional antisemitic myths dominate online antisemitism: new study

The biggest problem online isn’t demonisation of Israel but well-worn lies about Jewish power and wealth
Deborah Stone
Print this
Gab

An antisemitic image found on the social media platform Gab (OHPI)

Published: 15 October 2026

Last updated: 15 October 2026

The number of antisemitic items online was the highest on record over the past three months, with rates continuing to grow incrementally and erratically since the massive spike that followed the October 7 attack.

Antisemitism rates have failed to return to pre-October 7 levels, but although the increase is clearly correlated with the Hamas attack on Israel and subsequent War in Gaza, Israel is not the target of the most attacks.

Traditional antisemitism accounts for more than twice as much antisemitic content online as Israel- or Zionist-related content.

The Jewish Independent

The finding comes from the latest report of the Online Hate Prevention Institute, based on research conducted by Dr Andre Oboler, Jasmine Beinart and Eliyahou Roth.

The authors said the research made it clear that there was no validity to the charge that most antisemitism is really legitimate Israel-criticism.

“This finding is significant in the context of recurring claims that seek to deny or minimise the problem of antisemitism. These claims often suggest the rise can be explained away as a result of anti-Zionist or pro-Palestinian content being ‘misclassified’ as antisemitism. Our data does not support this. The nature of the antisemitism is largely of an older and more traditional kind, from claims of Jewish power to the accusation of deicide.”

The Jewish Independent

Many of the claims found online would have been recognisable in the Middle Ages: dehumanising Jews, promoting the idea of a world Jewish conspiracy, accusing Jews of being disloyal, bloodthirsty or money hungry.

Sometimes these traditional tropes are linked to current events, but they also frequently appear independently of Israel-Palestine issues.

Image from Telegram
Image from Telegram

The report’s authors emphasised that the finding that traditional antisemitism dominates did not invalidate concerns about antisemitism in the discourse around Zionism.

“Pro-Palestinian advocacy need not be antisemitic, yet too many seek to engage in antisemitism under the cover of calling it political advocacy, and too many stand by and allow it,” they wrote.

Image from Facebook
Image from Facebook

Problem platforms

The study included 11 social media platforms: Facebook, Twitter / X, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Reddit, LinkedIn, Gab, Telegram, BitChute and Threads.

It found traditional antisemitism is most prevalent on almost all platforms monitored, but dominates particularly strongly on Gab and Telegram, platforms particularly popular with the far right. Most Holocaust denial content is now on mainstream platforms.

Antisemitism related to Israel dominates on LinkedIn and Reddit, and is a particular issue on LinkedIn, where antisemitism related to Israel and Zionism consistently accounts for more than 70 per cent of the antisemitic material collected.

Incitement to violence is not widespread but is most likely to occur in comments on YouTube and TikTok.

The study found some social media platforms have policies to counter hate, but their systems are failing to enforce them.

“Where platforms are failing to address certain kinds of hate, such as with LinkedIn, which fails to recognise antisemitism when it speaks about Zionists or Israel, a strong response is needed from experts, community organisations and governments to address this ignorance and see policies, staff training, and AI tools updated,” it found.

A more challenging problem is the failure of platforms to even try to police antisemitism.

“Where platforms have reduced their trust and safety staff, turned off automated protections, and are seeing hate rise as a result, an urgent policy reversal is needed. This is particularly the case at Meta.”

Subversion of October 7

The study also included research into the use of October 7 by anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian groups, arguing the widespread timing of protests on the third anniversary of the attack was a direct attack on the innocent victims of terrorism.

“The aim of the protests organised for October 7 was to make the false narratives they promote become more dominant, and the facts and recent history less relevant. That is not political advocacy, it is not pro-Palestinian advocacy, it is simply bigotry,” they wrote.

The Jewish Independent

FULL REPORT

Analysing the new normal (OHPI)

You might also like
  • When security clashes with hospitality
    Jarod Rhine-Davis
  • Legendary magicians who made their Jewish identities disappear
    Nina Siegal
  • Sydney Uni commissions independent review after ‘Globalise the Intifada’ campaign
    Deborah Stone
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Passengers From Diverted Flydubai Flight To Arrive In Israel
    FeatureIsrael

    How ‘jihadist terror attack’ was averted on Israel-bound flight

    Tomer Almagor 2
    Picture 1
    ReflectionWorld

    A Gazan doctor’s journey of hope

    Deea Okasha 1
    Shocked New Yorker Watches the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001
    ReflectionWorld

    A new generation reckons with 9/11

    Gideon Cohen 1

About the author

Deborah Stone

Deborah Stone

Deborah Stone is Editor-in-Chief of TJI. She has more than 30 years experience as a journalist and editor, including as a reporter and feature writer on The Age and The Sunday Age, as Editor of the Australian Jewish News and as Editor of ArtsHub.

More from the author

NewsAustralia

Sydney Uni commissions independent review after ‘Globalise the Intifada’ campaign

NewsArts & Culture

Jerusalemites photos cancelled by Indian Festival

ReflectionArts & Culture

On despair: A reflection after watching ‘Cancelled’

NewsAustralia

Proposed digital care law to offer protection against online antisemitism