Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
Israel Hamas WarOpinionAustralia

Invisibility – Hamas’s secret weapon in the media war

It’s easy for students to get outraged at Israeli tanks and Palestinian corpses but hard to get up in arms at a terrorist group when you don’t see them do anything.
Michael Visontay
Print this
Two sets of posters with writing and pictures

Posters at Sydney University accusing Israel of murdering children (left) and posters calling for the release of hostages with no mention of Hamas.

Published: 17 June 2024

Last updated: 6 September 2024

People are pretty easily led. They tend to form opinions based on what they see or read. When they see an image or headline, it sticks in their mind. If they don’t see it, there’s nothing to stick. They’ve seen a lot of Israeli aggression in this war – missile tracers, soldiers, tanks, destroyed buildings. They’ve seen a lot of Palestinian suffering – mass corpses, grisly hospital scenes, mothers wailing.

But they haven’t seen a lot of Hamas because they’ve been largely invisible. It’s hard to get outraged at a terrorist group when you don’t see them do anything. In turn, it’s hardly surprising that there is such a huge tide of public opinion against Israel - and in support of Palestine.

I was reminded of the importance of visibility when I visited the encampment at the University of Sydney - and saw the posters and their messages on the front lawn: “Gadigal 2 Gaza”, “the Political Economy Society stands with Gaza”, “Free Palestine – End Apartheid, Stop Genocide”, “The University of Thales” (a weapons manufacturer).

One poster stood out among the others. Designed in the same style as the Israeli hostage posters that appeared after October 7, it showed the names and faces of children who had been killed, allegedly by Israel, in the years before the Hamas massacre on October 7.

The banner read “Murdered by Israel”.

Most of the Israeli hostage posters read “Bring Them Home” or “Kidnapped” – without mentioning Hamas. On reflection, that was a mistake. Some have had the name in small type added later. Naming Hamas from the start would remind the casual onlooker that these Israeli victims didn’t just disappear. Hamas took them. It would emphasise that Hamas was and is an active force in this war.

Everyone calls it the Israel-Gaza war. Why isn’t it known as the Israel-Hamas war? Israel is not fighting Gaza. It’s fighting Hamas.

The same absence is evident in the name of the war. Everyone calls it the Israel-Gaza war. That implies a conflict between Israel and Gaza. Yet the protagonists are Israel and Hamas. Why isn’t it known as the Israel-Hamas war? Israel is not fighting Gaza. It’s fighting Hamas.

Hamas’s responsibility for Palestinian deaths is also largely invisible. Its embedding of militants and rockets within the civilian population, - schools, hospitals, public buildings – is a strategic weapon which has successfully damaged Israel’s reputation and advanced the Palestinian cause. In private messages, Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar callously describes these civilian deaths as “necessary sacrifice”.

Israel’s refusal to let Western media into Gaza to report the war has exacerbated this imbalance of visibility. The decision was no doubt aimed at minimising international backlash over ugly images of death and destruction. But it has also helped keep Hamas invisible and passive. We have been deprived of seeing its battalions firing rockets, moving around civilian infrastructure, or engage in hand-hand fighting with Israeli soldiers.

These mechanics are not played out on TV or social media, they take too long to explain and would defy a Tik-Tok video. In turn, the protesters on campus are not confronted by these absences. These images are simply not there to see.

Before anyone complains that I am trying to shift all the responsibility, let me say this: Israel is culpable in many ways.

Before anyone complains that I am trying to shift all the responsibility, let me say this: Israel is culpable in many ways.

Not for genocide. But culpable for its indifference.

It is clear that Israel could and should have done more to reduce Palestinian deaths and injuries. If it has the intelligence and hardware to pinpoint a handful of hostages in two neighbouring apartments, as it did last week, then that same expertise could have been utilised over the past few months to minimise collateral civilian death.

At the same time, Benjamin Netanyahu appears to have used Israel’s two contradictory war aims – freeing the hostages and neutralising Hamas - to prolong the war and undermine the opportunity for a ceasefire when it is presented. The standards for ending the war that Netanyahu touts are designed to make resolution impossible. How will we ever be able to judge whether Israel has succeeded in eliminating Hamas’s military capability?

His government is also culpable over its withholding of aid, right from the start of the ground invasion, something proudly trumpeted by the Defence Minister Gallant, in the name of denying resources for Hamas. This has cumulatively led to the prospect of famine. There is simply no excuse for that. The provision of aid offers a clear opportunity to show compassion for the welfare of innocent people. Israel spurned that chance.

The images of bombs, dead bodies and starving civilians rioting at food trucks point to a simple ugly conclusion: Israel has shown little respect for Palestinian life. But Hamas has shown no more respect for the lives of its own people, and it has been more successful at hiding its culpability.

There is no moral high ground in this war. There is just a brutal battlefield and blinkered sympathies, united only by both Israel and Hamas’s leaders’ indifference to human suffering.

You might also like
  • UK’s dramatic policy change on Israel-Palestine
    Colin Shindler
  • New evidence Netanyahu was warned about October 7
    Shahar Burla
  • Fear of Netanyahu victory may drive big surge in Palestinian voter turnout
    Ben Lynfield
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Generation Change: Rachel Moshel
    Generation ChangeInterviewArts & Culture

    Rachel Moshel: Creating a space for Jewish art and joy

    Gideon Cohen
    Royal Commission final
    Royal CommissionNewsAustralia

    Strategies for cohesion final focus of Royal Commission hearings

    Peter Kohn 1
    neo-nazis white supremacists corowaTEST
    Royal CommissionOpinionAustralia

    Antisemitism, homophobia and a radical response to both

    Dennis Altman

About the author

Michael Visontay

More from the author

NewsAustralia

Matt Chun’s hate speech prompts change in arts funding policy

AnalysisAustralia

Mishandled antisemitism education is not just ineffective, it’s dangerous

FeatureLifestyle

Where Shtisel meets The Jetsons

ReviewIsrael

Beinart’s utopian vision ignores awkward truths

Comments2

  • Avatar of Alain

    Alain18 June at 01:02 pm

    A very insightful article. I was thinking about this for a while and assumed Hamas is controlling the images to prevent filming of their fighters in battle or dead. The only time we saw them was when they were taken prisoners.

  • Avatar of Michael Liffman

    Michael Liffman18 June at 07:18 am

    I see merit in your suggestion that the term should be ‘the Israel-Hamas war’.