Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenWorld
Israel Hamas WarAnalysisWorld

Diaspora leadership must be candid about its disillusion with Netanyahu

The ‘judicial reform’, war in Gaza and embrace of the far right has left an indelible mark on the next generation of Diaspora Jewry. Its leaders need to reflect this in their advocacy
Colin Shindler
Print this
Netanyahu Ben Gvir Getty

Benjamin Netanyahu and Itamar Ben-Gvir visit the scene of a shooting at the Ramot road junction in Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem on September 8, 2025 (Ronen Zvulun/Pool/AFP/Getty)

Published: 26 August 2026

Last updated: 26 August 2026

With the next election in Israel now only two months away, the desire of the far right to remain in power has become more explicit and more bizarre. The Minister for National Security, Itamar Ben-Gvir, recently proposed that 30 to 40 Palestinians in Gaza be “eliminated” every night. While this is expected from Ben-Gvir, the vaudeville Kahanist, less attention has been paid to the warm welcome that the Likud has offered to defecting members of his party.

Almog Cohen represented Ben-Gvir’s party in the Knesset until 2025 before falling out with him. He was noted for supporting the Russian invasion of Ukraine and opposing gay pride parades. He argued that the protective Iron Dome against missile attacks encouraged containment of the enemy rather than direct confrontation. In a deleted social media post, he wrote about “the streets of Gaza being washed by rivers of blood”.

In mid-August, Netanyahu granted him an exemption from Likud’s seniority regulations so that he could run in the party’s internal elections two weeks ago. He came eighth in the election and thereby gained a safe seat in the next Knesset.

In general, the far right within the Likud did exceedingly well in these internal elections, as did the proposers and architects of the “judicial reform” in 2023 who wished to remove the oversight of the Israeli judiciary and the checks and balances in political life.

Today the Likud styles itself as a populist party rather than the centre-right one of a decade ago. Netanyahu has facilitated this radicalisation of his party and clearly sees the function of Almog Cohen as a bridge to the other parties of the far right. The entry of these peripheral parties into Netanyahu’s coalition in 2022 did not take place simply out of necessity but also out of design.

Yet the “judicial reform”, the Gaza war and the embrace of the politically untouchable have left an indelible mark on the next generation of Diaspora Jewry.

No doubt, growing antisemitism in the Diaspora and the shunning of Jews will strengthen “the idea of Israel” for many. There will be those who will emigrate to Israel for reasons of sanctuary and those out of the desire to continue a Diaspora lifestyle.

However, Netanyahu’s coalition has challenged both Jewish values and Zionist beliefs in the Diaspora. The first Zionists in the Jewish settlement in Palestine not only wished to build a new state but also a new society – different from the ones they had left behind. The pioneers showed what Jews could do, working together collectively and believed in breaking the chain of Jewish persecution. Today's generation of young Diaspora Jews, however, expresses a profound ambivalence about the Zionist experiment.

Surveys find increasingly critical attitudes to Israel

In the JPR survey of 4,800 Jews in the UK a year ago, 24 per cent of 20-29-year-olds identified as anti-Zionist and another 20 per cent as non-Zionist. The June 2026 AP-NORC survey of 1,022 American Jews found that those under 50 were more critical and unfavourable towards Israel than older people.

The Jim Joseph Foundation in San Francisco commissioned a recent study which found that “the clearest negative theme … was disillusionment around Israel and Zionism and the way it was presented in Jewish education and community spaces”.

It is clear that many are repulsed by the ongoing duplicity of Netanyahu’s extremist coalition. Others in the Diaspora simply drop out – the burden of Zionism in 2026 is just too much and the albatross of Israel just too heavy.

None of this should come as a surprise. As governments in both the UK and Australia react with irritation to political utterances and actions during the Israeli election campaign, Jewish leaders often remain silent. Their fear is that any criticism of Netanyahu’s government will assist in the delegitimisation of the state.

Diaspora Jews think Netanyahu does not care

Many Diaspora Jews believe that Netanyahu simply does not care about the Diaspora except when the charge of antisemitism in the Diaspora can be used to aid the Likud in its election campaign. Netanyahu’s reference on August 13 to “the Islamic Republic of Britain” will not impress many young British Jews, but it may draw votes from the far right in Israel to vote for the Likud.

All this provides veracity to Henry Kissinger's claim that “Israel has no foreign policy, only domestic politics”. If the sacrifice of the succeeding generation of Diaspora Jews is the price to pay to stay in power, Netanyahu probably reasons, then “so be it!”

Netanyahu has also marginalised seven million American Jews and their organisations because he has a direct line to Trump and needs them less. And after all, American Jews are liberals who mostly vote Democrat. The caveat to all this is whether Netanyahu and his American acolytes still have the ability to raise sufficient funds for the Likud for the forthcoming Israeli election.

For those who remain committed to the Zionist cause, the liberal advocacy organisation J-Street has increasingly become a rival to AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee). J-Street seems to reflect the concerns of American Jews while AIPAC closes its eyes to reality. While money matters in American politics, many young American Jews believe that principle matters more. Many see clearly through a transparent hasbara where no difference between state and government is recognised.

Yet despite these tactics, the Likud seems to be stuck in the electoral doldrums. The Midgam polls for Israel’s Channel 13 ask over 1,200 respondents each week – and not the usual 500 as practised by other organisations. The nine polls between mid-June and mid-August consistently indicate the Netanyahu coalition attaining some 50-51 seats – clearly still far short of the magic figure of 61 necessary to form a government.

According to the polls, Ben-Gvir’s Otzma Yehudit and Smotrich’s Religious Zionism will remarkably retain their full complement of seats. Clearly, support for these parties in 2022 was no flash in the pan and another reason why they matter to Netanyahu. If another Netanyahu coalition is formed, Ben-Gvir and Smotrich will occupy senior positions.  

Now is undoubtedly the Diaspora’s winter of discontent. Remaining silent or impartial in the deliberations of this forthcoming election is not in the communal interests of Diaspora Jews. Only a change in Israel’s leadership will restore the relationship between Israel and the Diaspora.

As we approach the New Year 5787, the leadership of Jewish organisations in the Diaspora should represent the interests of their communities. They should clearly state that the return of Netanyahu and his allies to power would do irreparable damage to the relationship between the Diaspora and Israel – and that only a change of government offers the possibility to staunch the loss of the succeeding generation.

You might also like
  • UK’s dramatic policy change on Israel-Palestine
    Colin Shindler
  • Fear of Netanyahu victory may drive big surge in Palestinian voter turnout
    Ben Lynfield
  • The Altalena should be a warning, not a political weapon
    Shahar Burla
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    interfaith war
    FeatureWorld

    The illusion of Just War: Conflict ethics in Judaism, Christianity and Islam

    Dave Moskovitz
    Erdogan Turkey
    AnalysisIsrael

    Turkey emerges as military threat to Israel

    Dror Doron
    Jewish word map
    FeatureArts & Culture

    Was the barmi a shemozzle? How Australians use Jewish words 

    Caroline Hendy & Emma Breslow 1

About the author

Colin Shindler

Colin Shindler

Colin Shindler is an emeritus professor of Israel Studies at SOAS, University of London. He is the author of several books about Israel: the latest "A Forever War: Israel, Palestine and the Struggles for Statehood" was published in 2026.

More from the author

AnalysisWorld

UK’s dramatic policy change on Israel-Palestine

AnalysisWorld

Burnham and Miliband will have trust issues with future Israeli government

AnalysisWorld

If Andy Burnham becomes UK PM, what will that mean for Middle East policy?

Comments2

  • Avatar of Judith Usiskin

    Judith Usiskin27 August at 10:50 am

    Great article In your opinion which party will be able to make the case for movement towards some sort of two state ?

  • Avatar of Mark Ian

    Mark Ian26 August at 10:27 pm

    Even Jewish People and their Non-Jewish Sympathisers who advocate for a Palestinian State in 90% of the West Bank with Land Swaps and 90% of East Jerusalem are rejected and subject to Massacres with Atrocities and Barbarism by the Jihadi .
    Only IDF power and perhaps USA support protects the Jewish and their Gentile supporters in the Holy Land from the Sampson Option .
    No wars follow the 1949’Geneva Conventions but the some Jewish People in the Diaspora and even some IDF Israelis demand limits to Civilian Casualties in Gaza and the West Bank and Judea and Samaria .
    Israel cannot afford massive cruelty and many acknowledge warning orders to Evacuate areas to avoid Civilian Deaths have humane and moral value
    True Humane supplies of fresh water safe food reasonable shelter and medical supplies ought be better if you are a supporter of International Humanitarian Values.