Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
Australia

Netanyahu scapegoats NIF to distract attention from his own failure

Steven Glass
Print this

Published: 5 April 2018

Last updated: 4 March 2024

AS GOVERNMENTS DO around the world when they want to deflect public attention from their own policy failures, the Netanyahu government has sought to delegitimise a human rights organisation that’s holding it to account.   On this occasion the organisation was NIF, and the chosen tactic was to announce an inquiry into it.

Not that you could even call it an inquiry.  Prime Minister Netanyahu began with the manifestly false claim that NIF “endangers the security and future of the State of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people.” If that is the premise, what’s left to investigate?

But let’s back up a moment.  As we know, the Israeli government has become increasingly hostile to some 37,000 individuals seeking protection in Israel from serious persecution in Sudan and Eritrea.  Contrary to the Refugee Convention, hardly any have been allowed to even submit applications, but when they have, the courts have found that many are genuine refugees.

Nevertheless, the government decided that these people were to be forcibly deported en masse to Rwanda – a developing country without the skills or resources to absorb them.  Across Israel there was an outpouring of opposition to the plan – including from rabbis, El Al pilots, and human rights organisations like those supported and funded by NIF.

Here in Australia, NIF raised more than $23,000 almost overnight from a concerned Jewish community.

On Monday, with the government reeling in the aftermath of a military operation on the Gazan border that left 15 people dead and 700 wounded – an incident into which it has defiantly refused to allow any inquiry at all – Prime Minister Netanyahu announced that a deal had been done with the UNHCR under which roughly half the asylum seekers would be resettled in safe third countries, and half would remain in Israel.

It was a pragmatic outcome that would provide security and certainty to people who so desperately need it, and it was widely welcomed, including by NIF.

But less than 24 hours later, the Prime Minister flipped.  The UNHCR deal was unilaterally cancelled.  And NIF was to blame, he claimed, because it had undermined the Rwanda arrangement.  For this, an inquiry is to be held into NIF.

It’s astonishing to comprehend the magnitude of the incongruity:  no investigation into the cause of the deaths of 15 people and the wounding of 700 others, but an investigation into a human rights campaign that resulted in an outcome that would have allowed 37,000 vulnerable people to rebuild their lives in peace and security.

One is compelled to ponder why.  No security was endangered except the security of tenure of a government whose policies are failing.  No wounds were inflicted except to the government’s pride.

NIF has nothing to hide and nothing to fear.  As NIF’s CEO, Daniel Sokatch, said: “We're proud of our work.  NIF did not pressure the Rwandan government to refuse to participate in Netanyahu's cruel mass deportation plan. We did support massive numbers of Israelis standing up for what is right and demanding action from their own government…  Mr. Netanyahu, you want to investigate us?  I'll answer any question you like.”
You might also like
  • Sanctioning settlements is a defence of Israel, not an attack
    Elisheva Madar
  • Sanctions must influence, not just perform disapproval
    Adam Slonim
  • Mind the mentality: not every rejection is antisemitism
    Nomi Kaltmann
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    jiff26-cancelled.jpg
    ReflectionArts & Culture

    On despair: A reflection after watching ‘Cancelled’

    Deborah Stone
    Generation change Template
    Generation ChangeInterviewAustralia

    Ash Densham: Building community through Humanistic Judaism

    Gideon Cohen
    neo-nazis white supremacists corowaTEST
    Royal CommissionOpinionAustralia

    Antisemitism, homophobia and a radical response to both

    Dennis Altman

About the author

Steven Glass

Steven Glass

Steven Glass is Vice-President of NIF Australia

More from the author

Opinion

‘The danger lies not in what BtS says but in seeking to silence them’