Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenIsrael
Israel Votes 2026OpinionIsrael

Flying to vote is an act of love, not impudence

Israelis who spend thousands of dollars and travel across the world to cast a ballot are demonstrating how deeply they remain connected to their homeland
Shahar Burla
Print this
fly to vote

Image: TJI

Published: 20 August 2026

Last updated: 20 August 2026

Kalman Liebskind, editor-in-chief of the right-wing newspaper Makor Rishon, recently ignited a heated debate by describing Israeli emigrants planning to return for the 27 October election as “impudent people”.

Organisers hope that as many as 70,000 Israelis will travel to Israel to vote in October, potentially representing the equivalent of about two Knesset seats. In an extremely close election, their participation could determine the result.

The initiative to bring voters home emerged largely from the liberal bloc, explaining right-wing bloc anxiety. The Likud party has said it may pursue legal action against the organisers of the campaign to bring expatriate Israelis back to vote. Yet the organisers cannot control what happens once a voter enters the polling booth.

“Our future here can only be determined by those who bear the consequences of their election,” Liebskind argued. Those who understand how fateful this election is, he continued, should also understand that Israel’s fate cannot be determined by people who no longer live there.

Public opinion is divided rather than overwhelmingly hostile. A Channel 13 poll found that 51 per cent of Israelis supported citizens living abroad returning to vote. The controversy itself reveals that many Israelis recognise the continuing connection between citizenship and political participation.

Liebskind presents a serious argument. Israelis living abroad do not experience every consequence of government policy. Many do not pay Israeli taxes, serve in the reserves or confront the daily effects of decisions about the economy, education and security. Why, then, should they help determine the government under which other Israelis must live?

Over the past three years, we have seen how decisions made by the Israeli government can have immediate consequences for Israelis and Jewish communities throughout the world

But this argument ultimately fails. Israelis who retain citizenship also retain the legal and moral right to vote. More importantly, the assumption that they do not bear the consequences of Israeli elections is no longer sustainable.

Nor should we ignore what their decision to return represents. People do not spend thousands of dollars and travel across the world to cast a single ballot because they are indifferent to Israel. They do so because they remain concerned about its direction and connected to its future. Flying home to vote is not an act of impudence, but an act of love.

Israel’s decisions do not stop at its borders

Over the past three years, we have seen how decisions made by the Israeli government can have immediate consequences for Israelis and Jewish communities throughout the world. The war in Gaza, Israel’s growing diplomatic isolation and the government’s conduct have shaped the safety, reputation and daily lives of Jews far beyond Israel’s borders.

Jewish schools, synagogues and community organisations in Australia have been forced to strengthen security. Israelis and Jews have faced hostility in workplaces, universities and public spaces. Diaspora communities have been expected to explain and defend decisions over which they had no influence.

Israel has always sought the political, financial and moral support of Diaspora Jews. After October 7, Israelis living abroad flew back to serve in the reserves and volunteer. Jewish communities raised vast sums, advocated for Israel and supported displaced families. Israel also actively encourages young Jews from around the world to serve as lone soldiers.

It is difficult to insist that Israelis abroad share responsibility for Israel in wartime but remain silent at election time. Responsibility cannot be demanded only when it is convenient.

An international exception

Israel is also an international exception. As of 2020, 141 countries allowed citizens living abroad to vote. The United States, France, the Netherlands, Canada and Germany all provide mechanisms for overseas voting, although eligibility conditions vary. France even has parliamentary constituencies representing citizens abroad.

The strongest motive to fly and vote is care: concern for Israel’s direction, fear for its future and love for a homeland that remains part of their identity

Among developed democracies, Israel and Ireland are unusual in severely restricting overseas voting. Israel generally requires citizens to be physically present on election day, except for limited categories of officials serving abroad.

Ireland experienced its own version of Israel’s current debate in 2018, when thousands of Irish citizens returned home for the referendum that removed the constitutional ban on abortion. Their journeys were celebrated as democratic participation, not condemned as foreign interference.

A journey that demonstrates connection

Those returning are not a single ideological community. They include people on the left, right and centre, religious and secular Israelis, and people who left for work, study, family or personal reasons.

Most importantly, consider what these voters are prepared to do. An Israeli travelling from Australia may spend at least $3,000 on flights, endure more than 20 hours of travel and take time away from work and family, simply to place one ballot in a box.

There is no personal reward for doing so. The strongest motive is care: concern for Israel’s direction, fear for its future and love for a homeland that remains part of their identity.

An indifferent person would stay home.

The Jewish Independent

The language of yordim, literally, those who “descend” by leaving Israel, is itself outdated. Today’s Israeli economy depends on global networks. High-tech companies need executives, sales teams and business development staff close to international customers. According to the Israel Innovation Authority’s 2026 report, only 62 per cent of employees in private Israeli high-tech companies are based in Israel, with much of the overseas growth occurring in the United States.

Many Israelis abroad are not abandoning Israel’s economy. They are expanding its reach, opening markets and bringing revenue and investment back to Israeli companies.

There is also an uncomfortable political reality. According to Central Bureau of Statistics estimates cited by Haaretz columnist Sami Peretz, around 140,000 Israelis emigrated between 2023 and 2025. Many left amid the attempted judicial overhaul, the catastrophic failure of October 7 and the prolonged war that followed.

Some of these Israelis want to return one day. But they want to return to a liberal, democratic and secure Israel. If they believe that future is in danger, coming back to vote is not hypocrisy. It is an attempt to preserve the country to which they hope to return.

Israel should reform its electoral laws and allow citizens abroad to vote under carefully defined conditions. Until then, those prepared to cross oceans to exercise their democratic right should be welcomed.

Flying home to vote is not an act of impudence. It is moral, democratic and profoundly Israeli. Above all, it is an act of love.

You might also like
  • Confronting Richard Flanagan and the myth of the Israel lobby
    Mary Garden
  • Facing a new year with the knowledge life can be better
    The Jewish Independent
  • New evidence Netanyahu was warned about October 7
    Shahar Burla
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    altalena
    Israel Votes 2026OpinionIsrael

    The Altalena should be a warning, not a political weapon

    Shahar Burla 1
    Rozana Beit Oula
    PeacebuildingOpinionIsrael

    Peacebuilding through the eyes of a sceptic

    Ron Finkel
    ISRAEL-LGBTQ-PRIDE-PARADE-PALESTINIAN-CONFLICT-HOSTAGES
    NewsIsrael

    LGBT asylum seekers caught between Palestinian violence and Israeli bureaucracy

    Jarod Rhine-Davis

About the author

Shahar Burla

Shahar Burla

Dr Shahar Burla is a Sydney-based researcher, lecturer and Contributing Editor of TJI. Shahar holds a Master’s degree in political science from Hebrew University and a PhD in political science from Bar-Ilan University. He is the author of Political Imagination in the Diaspora: The Construction of a Pro-Israeli Narrative (2013) and co-editor of Australia and Israel: A Diasporic, Cultural and Political Relationship (2015).

More from the author

FeatureIsrael

New evidence Netanyahu was warned about October 7

OpinionIsrael

The Altalena should be a warning, not a political weapon

AnalysisIsrael

Who is Ofer Winter and could he upset Netanyahu’s election?

AnalysisIsrael

Bennett’s balancing act: can he win over the right without losing the centre?

Comments

No comments on this article yet. Be the first to add your thoughts.