Published: 20 May 2022
Last updated: 4 March 2024
BEN LYNFIELD visits the villages south of Hebron where the Supreme Court has approved the eviction of 1200 Palestinians to repurpose their land as a military firing range
AL-FAKHIT, OCCUPIED WEST BANK--What settler violence and army pressure failed to accomplish in recent years, the Israeli Supreme Court is now enabling: forcible eviction of some 1200 Palestinian men, women and children from eight herding villages in the south Hebron hills.
The decision to dismiss appeals against their expulsion could pave the way for other army and state ordered evictions of Palestinians in the West Bank, according to human rights lawyer Neta Amar. "This opens the door for a completely different framework for moving people around," she told The Jewish Independent.
Taken after rights groups waged a 20-year legal battle to keep the Palestinians on land declared by the army as a firing zone, the court ruling spread fear and dread throughout Masafer Yata, the Arabic name for the hilly, parched area of impoverished herding hamlets in the south Hebron hills of the occupied West Bank.
"If the Jews want more land, it should not be on the back of the Palestinians," said Mohammed Hamamreh of the Mufaqara hamlet to The Jewish Independent. His four-year-old grandson Mohammed was struck in the head by a rock thrown by a settler during a September rampage. He was wounded in the arm himself, as four other Palestinians were hurt and property destroyed.
Israeli military administrators did not answer a query by The Jewish Independent on whether expulsion would ensue in the aftermath of the decision. Roni Pelli, a lawyer for the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, who argued on behalf of the villagers, told The Jewish Independent the army "has no limitations on it" and can expel the Palestinians at any time.
It would be the biggest eviction of Palestinians since the occupation of the West Bank began in 1967, according to Dror Sadot, spokeswoman for human rights group B'tselem. The ruling "sets a very dangerous precedent," Pelli says, because it specifies that military orders or Israeli legislation transcends the protections of international humanitarian law.

