Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
FeatureAustralia

The Queen is dead. Long live the republic.

Deborah Stone
Print this

Published: 16 September 2022

Last updated: 5 March 2024

Now is the time for Australia to revive the republic debate and the Jewish community has a role to play, writes DEBORAH STONE.

The death of Elizabeth II combined with the election of a new Australian Government makes it timely to return to the question of whether Australia should become a republic.

Elizabeth was a monarch from another age. When she came to the throne in 1952, Aborigines were not counted as Australians, women were not entitled to equal pay with men, homosexuality was criminal, and people who had never been there sometimes referred to Britain as “home”.

She reigned through a period of tremendous social change and her memory should be honoured for her personal dedication and hard work, whatever the rights and wrongs of the institution she represented.

This queen’s personal standing as a force for good, or at least for stability, was significant in retarding the last attempt to turn Australia into a republic in 1999. The “no” campaign was able to contrast a notional politically appointed president with a known and respected monarch. The republicans lost, with 54.87% of Australians voting to retain the monarchy.

That our head of state must be British and the head of the Church of England is an affront to all Australians, but particularly to those who are not of British heritage and not Anglicans.

Republicans have been biding their time to try again. Even former Republican Movement chair Malcolm Turnbull acknowledged two years ago that any future attempt to revive republicanism in Australia needed to wait until the end of Queen Elizabeth’s reign.

Australia has changed since the 1999 referendum. The declaration of the Uluru Statement from the Heart in 2017 provided a clear pathway for constitutional change which recognises prior rights of First Nations people to the land we call Australia.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has committed to the Uluru Statement, and we can expect that in the life of this government a referendum for a First Nations Voice and Makarrata (Reconciliation) Commission will come before the Australian people.

Hopefully it will be that rare thing in Australian history: a referendum that passes overwhelmingly. (Only eight of the 44 referenda put since Federation have passed but the 1967 referendum to amend the constitution to count Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders in the Australian population achieved a 90.77 % “yes” vote.)

Recognition of the prior claim of First Nations is the primary step to building an Australian identity based on an honest reflection of the country’s history.

The next step will be to recognise the equal status of Australians from all migrant backgrounds – be they descendants of Britons who arrived on the First Fleet, beneficiaries of the great wave of post-war migration from Europe, or newcomers from China, Sri Lanka or Sudan.

More than 40% of Australians identify with a heritage that is not Anglo-Celtic. In fact, if you group Ireland with the non-British (and surely the Irish don’t have a historical loyalty to the Crown), the non-British tip the majority scales at 53%.

Yet we still have a monarch whose only claim on our loyalty is a colonial relationship whose legitimacy is now questioned by many Australians.

As long as we maintain a constitutional attachment to Britain as the mothership, we are recognising the British claim over Australia and giving precedence to Australians of British stock. That is a ship that should have sailed long ago.

Jews have a deep attachment to heritage and a historical understanding of what happens when minority populations are not fully included in a society’s concept of itself.

We are also blessed with being established, safe and comfortable in Australia, which means we are in a position to speak out on social issues and provide leadership to newer migrant communities, who may be more anxious about change.

So, we should be natural supporters of a republican Australia, a place where the Head of State can be anybody from any background.

In the 1999 referendum, some new migrants with no reason to want a British monarch resisted change. Perhaps, frequently coming from unstable societies, they simply didn’t want to fix something they did not perceive as broken.

But migrant communities should be in favour of a republic. That our head of state must be British and the head of the Church of England is an affront to all Australians, but particularly to those who are not of British heritage and not Anglicans.

That the role remains inherited – rather than chosen on merit or ability – runs counter to our democratic principles. The Queen’s stalwartness notwithstanding, the past 30 years have provided a Windsor soap opera which makes it clear that royal bloodlines do not guarantee behaviour befitting a head of state.

Much of the failure of the 1999 referendum was structural. There was disagreement about the process for appointing or electing a head of state. There is considerable work to do in developing a proposal that has widespread support.

The current proposal of the Australian Republican Movement is for a combined nomination and direct election process. Every state and territory parliament would be able to nominate one candidate for election to be head of state. The federal parliament will be able to nominate up to three. Australian would then vote directly on which candidate should be head of state.

It will take time to educate Australians to this idea but the time to start is now.

A new republican referendum won’t come in the first term of the Albanese government. The Uluru statement referendum must come first and the two should not be combined because doing so would risk the success of both.

But the Queen’s death puts the issue back on the agenda. King Charles III is the new monarch of Britain. He should be the last monarch of Australia.

Illustration: Avi Katz

You might also like
  • Confronting Richard Flanagan and the myth of the Israel lobby
    Mary Garden
  • Facing a new year with the knowledge life can be better
    The Jewish Independent
  • No action to stop Hezbollah ally beaming antisemitic and anti-Israel content into Australia
    Michael Visontay
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    vandalism car woollahra fuk israel farhat
    Australia

    Court decision fails to understand when ‘Fuk Israel’ becomes antisemitic

    Jeremie Bracka 6
    Woman with land and houses behind her
    NewsAustralia

    Australia to increase sanctions against West Bank settlements

    Deborah Stone
    funding handouts
    NewsAustralia

    Who will get the money from the Cranbourne windfall?

    Gideon Cohen

About the author

Deborah Stone

Deborah Stone

Deborah Stone is Editor-in-Chief of TJI. She has more than 30 years experience as a journalist and editor, including as a reporter and feature writer on The Age and The Sunday Age, as Editor of the Australian Jewish News and as Editor of ArtsHub.

More from the author

Australia

Tame apologises – but with little grace

NewsAustralia

Australia to increase sanctions against West Bank settlements

NewsAustralia

Humanitarian organisations fail on antisemitism: new research

NewsAustralia

AJN pulls article criticising abuse of Sarah Schwartz