Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
NewsAustralia

Proposed digital care law to offer protection against online antisemitism

The Antisemitism Envoy is supporting the Government’s Digital Duty of Care Bill, saying it is needed to stop the spread of antisemitic content in social media feeds
Deborah Stone
Print this
antisemitism online

Illustration: TJI

Published: 16 September 2026

Last updated: 16 September 2026

The Federal Government is positioning its new Digital Duty of Care legislation as an initiative that will help fight antisemitism.

It has gained the support of the Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism Jillian Segal, who told The Daily Telegraph that it is important for Australia to pass this legislation, in line with similar legislation in the UK and Europe.

The Digital Duty of Care Bill, which will come before parliament in October, would prevent digital services, such as games, apps and AI, from feeding harmful content to users aged under 18, including antisemitic and racist content.

Social media platforms will have to ask users whether they want a personalised, algorithm-driven feed or a chronological feed showing only accounts they actively follow, a system Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has labelled “My Feed, My Way”.

While the legislation has primarily been promoted to address issues such as cyberbullying, eating disorders, and misogyny, this week the Government highlighted its value as an antisemitism-prevention strategy.

The Member for Macnamara, Josh Burns, asked in Parliament what the government is doing to protect children from harmful content online.

The question set up Communications Minister Annika Wells to talk about the dangers of social media and online platforms and promote the need for the Bill, which the Opposition is fighting.

“If the platforms have been incubators and accelerators for extremism to date, we hold grave fears that artificial intelligence could make these problems worse. Our national security organisations and law enforcement are doing everything in their power to protect Australians from the rising threat of terrorism and extremism.

“But Australia's proposed digital duty of care will go right to the source, putting the onus on big tech to identify, detect and prevent the risk of online terrorism and extremism before it occurs,” Wells told Parliament.

The Minister welcomed Segal’s support for the legislation. “The Special Envoy joins the many community organisations and public figures who support our digital duty of care. The proposed duty should not be controversial or political. Terrorists should not be able to live stream their attacks or recruit children through online games. AI chatbots should not instruct children how to commit violent acts.”

Segal told The Daily Telegraph that the online response to the Bondi massacre made it clear the legislation was necessary.

“Within hours of the Bondi attack, we saw social media platforms feeding users denials that it was real, conspiracy theories that it was a ‘false flag’ operation and justifications for the murder of innocent people.

“My hope is that a digital duty of care will make it harder for algorithms and recommender systems to dish up this sort of content to Australians, particularly children. People should have a choice of what they see, but, to the extent what they see is determined by algorithms, feeds should contain fewer overseas bots pushing malicious hate and fewer anonymous trolls using antisemitism to drive engagement.”

Burns’ question also asked the government what it is doing about antisemitism in the education system, prompting Education Minister Jason Clare to cite the educational importance of the digital duty of care law.

Clare referenced the Antisemitism Education Task Force, chaired by David Gonski, and teacher training and curriculum, adding, “But that work can be undone when kids finish school, and they get back on their phones and back on the Internet. Antisemitism, I think, as we all know, has exploded online. To give you an example of how it's affecting our kids, research shows that a teenage boy today only needs to spend about an hour on TikTok looking at lifestyle content for men before being served conspiracy theories about Jewish people. That's algorithms that do this, spewing all of that poison at our kids, serving up hate on a plate. We need to do something about it.”

Leader of the Opposition Angus Taylor says the Opposition will oppose the legislation, which he described as a “Big Brother bill” and “a blank cheque on political censorship”.

You might also like
  • Sydney Uni commissions independent review after ‘Globalise the Intifada’ campaign
    Deborah Stone
  • New evidence points to Iranian responsibility for Diaspora antisemitic attacks
    Colin Shindler
  • How not to apologise
    Zac Klugman
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Jewish cemetery
    NewsAustralia

    Melbourne Chevra Kadisha implicitly recognises LGBTQ+ families

    Jarod Rhine-Davis 1
    Nadia
    ReflectionAustralia

    Between communities: finding Jewish belonging after migration

    Florencia Tuchin
    Zoe Better pillars of light crop
    FeatureAustralia

    NDIS changes threaten disabled participation in community life

    Jarod Rhine-Davis

About the author

Deborah Stone

Deborah Stone

Deborah Stone is Editor-in-Chief of TJI. She has more than 30 years experience as a journalist and editor, including as a reporter and feature writer on The Age and The Sunday Age, as Editor of the Australian Jewish News and as Editor of ArtsHub.

More from the author

NewsAustralia

Sydney Uni commissions independent review after ‘Globalise the Intifada’ campaign

NewsArts & Culture

Jerusalemites photos cancelled by Indian Festival

ReflectionArts & Culture

On despair: A reflection after watching ‘Cancelled’