Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
EditorialAustralia

We must fight Hanson’s regressive monoculturalism

We must not allow fear of Islamic extremism to destroy multiculturalism or shut down migration
The Jewish Independent
Print this
Pauline Hanson, Leader of One Nation, Addresses National Press Club

One Nation Leader speaks at the National Press Club on June 17, 2026 in Canberra (Hilary Wardhaugh/Getty Images)

Published: 23 June 2026

Last updated: 23 June 2026

When Pauline Hanson gave her maiden speech calling for a rejection of multiculturalism in 1996, she was a marginal voice widely dismissed as an extremist.

When she called for a monocultural Australia at the National Press Club last week, she was equally extreme but much more dangerous.

In the intervening 30 years, populist movements that blame migrants and minorities for economic and social ills have gained traction across the Western world. The MAGA politics of Donald Trump, the Brexit isolationism of Nigel Farage, and the rise of far-right parties across Europe are all symptoms of a world that is retreating from globalism and rejecting the diversity and open-mindedness that characterised the last decades of the 20th century.

In Australia, where multiculturalism has been deeply integrated and largely successful since its formal introduction by the Whitlam government in 1973, this movement has been relatively slow to gain a foothold.

But it is clearly doing so now. Hanson’s One Nation has just won its first House of Representatives seat, the watershed that precipitated her invitation to the Press Club. The Liberal Party, flailing electorally, has responded with language that is slightly subtler, but contains the same dog whistles about “putting Australian values at the heart of immigration policies”.

Any Jewish support for an anti-migration, monocultural Australia depends on a short memory and an even shorter horizon

There are good reasons why this populist movement is gaining ground internationally, and those of us who are alarmed by it must be careful not to dismiss them. Faced with economic instability and massive change, traditionally powerful groups are losing ground. White men can no longer assume the right to the best jobs or the last word. Uncertainty is everywhere, from gender identity to technology. Raising the barricades is a natural response.

Much of this reaction is about finding someone to blame when the problem is elsewhere. Turning on migrants will not stop the march of AI nor resurrect the certainties of an earlier era.

But some of it is also about genuine fear, which is why when Hanson moves from attacking Aboriginals and Asians to focusing on Muslims, she finds new sources of support, including from some Jews, who should know better.

Western countries are right to fear the importation of Islamic extremism, and, as Australia knows only too well after the Bondi terror attack, Jews have most reason to be afraid of the small minority of migrants who want to damage the societies that welcome them.

It is understandable that some people translate their fear of extremist Islam into fear of all Muslim migration, but it is a tendency we must resist.

Any Jewish support for an anti-migration, monocultural Australia depends on a short memory and an even shorter horizon.

Jews know all too well what it is to be a minority in a country that does not welcome and respect difference. We know that when the dominant culture is given hegemony, the costs for those of us who do not wish to be absorbed are too high. There is a very short distance from marginalisation to suppression to oppression, from discounting the value of minority languages, religions or cultural practices to outlawing their expression and persecuting their practitioners.

Extremism is more likely to flourish when migrants feel marginalised and alienated

Equally, we recognise the benefits of welcoming migrants and allowing their cultures to enrich our society. Many of us have grandparents who came to Australia with nothing and built lives whose fruits we enjoy today. Australia would not be what it is today without migrants such as businessman Frank Lowy, heart surgeon Victor Chang, tennis player Jelena Dokic or fashion designer Carla Zampatti – nor without the thousands of migrants who built the Snowy Mountains Scheme, planted our first vineyards, and still do most of our nursing and aged care.

Last week, Hanson cited the number of people speaking Arabic or Mandarin at home as a problem. But multilingualism is not a disadvantage – it is a strength which increases cognitive capacity and provides a potential economic boon to our nation. She threatened to abolish SBS, a service we should treasure both as a cultural resource and a source of variety and quality at a time of shrinking media diversity.

Marginalising Muslims is not good for the Jews. No one – least of all Jews – should want to live in a country that treats difference as threatening or views outsiders with hostility. Our right to be who we are – to treasure our heritage, celebrate our festivals, educate our children in our way of life – depends on respect for difference.

The path to social cohesion is not to shut down migration: it is to set appropriate targets, run rigorous screening procedures, and support new migrants through thorough integration processes.

Extremism is more likely to flourish when migrants feel marginalised and alienated. Rather than asking migrants to jettison their languages, religion or cultures, we should ensure cultural diversity can flourish in a context of respect and understanding.

Migrants should be required and helped to learn English, but not instead of their mother tongues. Religious and cultural organisations that promote moderation and harmony should be supported and funded: they are the frontline against extremism.

Immigration in a deeply unequal world is a hard problem. Those of us who live in privileged countries have won life’s lottery, and we can expect that the rest of the world will hammer increasingly loudly upon our door. It is incumbent upon us to create an immigration policy that is fair and careful, which acknowledges the value of migration in this still under-populated country, while protecting the security and community of those who are already here.

The term “Australian values” too often has the quality identified by Humpty Dumpty in Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass: “When I use a word it means just what I choose it to mean.”

But perhaps the most Australian of values is the concept of a “fair go”. The Life in Australia booklet distributed to migrants defines a “fair go” as encompassing mutual respect, tolerance, compassion for those in need, and equality of opportunity for all. Monoculturalism need not apply.

You might also like
  • Tame apologises – but with little grace
    Deborah Stone
  • Confronting Richard Flanagan and the myth of the Israel lobby
    Mary Garden
  • Facing a new year with the knowledge life can be better
    The Jewish Independent
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Albanese Bondi
    Royal CommissionAnalysisAustralia

    Prime minister’s absence exposes weakness in Royal Commission hearings

    Michael Visontay
    Generation Change: Rachel Moshel
    Generation ChangeInterviewArts & Culture

    Rachel Moshel: Creating a space for Jewish art and joy

    Gideon Cohen
    vandalism car woollahra fuk israel farhat
    Australia

    Court decision fails to understand when ‘Fuk Israel’ becomes antisemitic

    Jeremie Bracka 6

About the author

The Jewish Independent

The Jewish Independent

More from the author

EditorialAustralia

Facing a new year with the knowledge life can be better

VideoLifestyle

Neurodivergence and inclusion in the Jcom

PodcastLifestyle

Finding Our Why

Comments5

  • Avatar of Moti

    Moti13 July at 09:06 am

    “Colin” describes the writer as smug and condescending. Apparently he’s spoken to another Jew who agrees with him about Hanson, and I think we can agree “Colins” smug nand condescending.
    Personally I find it a beautifully articulated article, and congratulate the author.
    Sadly, I feel Australians are in real danger of jumping into the flames by mistake, because they dont being in the hot pan, and articles like this should be a very loud wake up call.

  • Avatar of Moti

    Moti13 July at 08:50 am

    I’m finding it hard to comprehend any Jew finding anything alluring in Hanson.
    That this discussion is going on, in the same week Hansons gallivanting around Europe, on Rineharts credit card, meeting with Tommy Robinson, Holly Valance and any other right winger who’ll give her the time of day.
    Some of us actually remember the old Pauline who sprayed her vitriol far more widely. As the author notes, shes now refined her shtick and for now, Jews, Israel etc are in the good guys column.
    We’ve seen this movie before, just on 100 yrs ago. It didn’t end well. Handing control to overbearing, dominant “leaders”, and their minions never has.

  • Avatar of Colin

    Colin8 July at 08:33 am

    What smug and condescending drivel. You do not speak for all Australian Jews, many of whom agree with and support Hanson.

  • Avatar of SIMON KRITE

    SIMON KRITE27 June at 10:06 am

    This article perfectly illustrates why increasing numbers of Australians, including Jews, are drifting towards Pauline Hanson.
    Rather than engaging with the issues, it labels the person raising them.
    Most people supporting Hanson are not rejecting multiculturalism. They are asking a legitimate question. Has Australia’s historically successful model of multiculturalism worked equally well across all communities?
    Australia has been enormously successful at integrating migrants into a common national culture built on the rule of law, democracy, equality before the law and our Judeo-Christian heritage. But pretending every migration and integration outcome has been equally successful is straight out denial.
    The article dismisses concerns about social cohesion, integration and antisemitism as fear, populism or nostalgia. Those concerns are real, and refusing to discuss them honestly is precisely what has fuelled support for One Nation.
    People aren’t voting for Pauline Hanson because they suddenly oppose diversity. They are voting for her because they believe she is one of the few politicians prepared to acknowledge problems the major parties are unwilling to confront.
    Labels don’t solve problems. Honest conversations do.

  • Avatar of Kate Mannix

    Kate Mannix25 June at 11:29 pm

    This editorial misrepresents what Hanson said at the Press Club. She did not say people could not speak their native languages at home. She certainly said there should be limits to immigration (as do Labor and Liberal) due to the housing crisis. She made a definite distinction between immigration (necessary) and multiculturalism, which she argued undermines social cohesion. I am not sure if she is right. But commentators do the public a disservice if they misquote the speaker and roll immigration and multiculturalism together, as if Hanson is merely a racist and therefore to be dismissed. If all cultures are of equal value, then for the Islamist, the murder of Jews is a virtuous act, right? Our legal system will put the killer in prison. But the first Australian fatwa may well be celebrated by some. We have seen the dismaying sight of Anglo Australians banging on about the ‘resistance’. If this is where multiculturalism leads, Pauline Hanson may be onto something.