Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenArts & Culture
OpinionArts & CultureAustralia

Randa Abdel-Fattah is a perverse poster child for free speech

I find Randa Abdel-Fattah’s rhetoric abhorrent and her positions hypocritical. But I don't think Adelaide Writers' Week should have cancelled her.
Isabelle Oderberg
Print this
Randa Abdel-Fattah keffiyeh

Randa Abdel-Fattah keffiyeh pictured on her Instagram account (@randaafattah)

Published: 13 January 2026

Last updated: 15 January 2026

Espousing your morals and ideas and living your life in alignment with them are two very different concepts.

Everyone wants to believe they are living a life of good decisions and moral fortitude, but in reality, there are lots of temptations that get in the way; sweet schadenfreude, the deliciousness of revenge, the hunger of greed, the power of ego, the pull of power or ambition and the list goes on.

Ultimately, it can be hard work to be the best person you can be, and I think in some respects, it should be. 

Some of the most central tenets of social justice include centring lived experience, not talking over people who have skin in the game, recognising and listening when other people try to explain their identity and applying the same standards and humanity to all people, rather than engaging in selective judgement of who is deserving. 

The left has been guilty of widespread hypocrisy over these values since October 7. I’ve watched the “rules of engagement” broken repeatedly by people I had previously called friends and colleagues and lost respect for so many people I previously admired. 

Nowhere has this hypocrisy been more evident than in the work and writing of Randa Abdel-Fattah. 

It therefore gives me not one iota of pleasure to write that pulling Randa Abdel-Fattah from the program of the Adelaide Writers' Week – and the way in which it was done – was a mistake.  

She calls for the recognition of the humanity of her own people, while simultaneously dehumanising others

These festivals are forums for conversation and debate, and this often means debating ideas that are controversial or with which many people disagree. Free speech is not without limitations of course, but arbitrary cancellation at the whim of a few (or even many) is not appropriate.

A debate on whether Randa Abdel-Fattah should have been programmed at Adelaide Writers' Week could be had, but it is mostly inconsequential at this juncture because Randa Abdel-Fattah was invited to appear at the festival, just as she was invited in 2023. She duly accepted that invitation and was then publicly uninvited with a statement containing a bizarre explanation that led to more questions and conjecture than clarity. 

It’s painful and ill-judged decision-making that prompted withdrawals from at least 180 other writers and has now led to the cancellation of Adelaide Writers' Week. This kind of kneejerk action is becoming all too common and exacerbates already explosive tensions.

Double standard

At the core of my current frustration is that although I disagree with the cancellation, I am equally offended by Abdel-Fattah’s current swift elevation to be the poster child for Australian free speech.

She has been outspoken about free speech, when it applies to the Palestinian cause, but she is perfectly willing to shut down those she perceives have a different view or perspective, or simply won’t toe her line.

After the debacle when writers withdrew from last year’s Bendigo Writers’ Festival over an attempted code of conduct, Abdel-Fattah wrote: “So many writers have withdrawn not only in solidarity but because this is an assault on our collective right to assert sovereignty of the words and language we use to name our oppression, critique the ideologies and racist logics and systems that seek to crush us.” 

She has also written extensively on the word “intifada” and its definition, as well as the definition of the phrase “from the river to the sea”, criticising any attempts to define these words in any way other than how she defines them. Given that they are words used by her community and her cause, she is justified in defining how they are used. 

But she simultaneously denies Zionists the same right to define this very word.  She has repeatedly ignored calls from the Jewish community to desist in defining the words “Zionist” and “Zionism” as the embodiment of all evil, an evil apparently worse than any other to exist in the history of mankind. 

For anyone who has ever had a conversation with a Jew or picked up a book, Zionism, like any political ideology, is a spectrum with a range of different views and perceptions and political persuasions.

If you genuinely believe in freedom of speech or artistic freedom, you cannot be selective about who gets to enjoy it

Clearly as a Palestinian Australian, she and her community has experienced decades of trauma, which makes it perplexing that she repeatedly engages in narrative inversion of any terminology used by Jews to describe their own trauma, applying it to her own experience or using it as a cudgel with which to repeatedly attempt to smash any Jews except the few she defines as acceptable.

In a move reminiscent of two arsonists shouting “fire” at each other while holding burning matches, she calls for the recognition of the humanity of her own people, while simultaneously dehumanising others.

Abdel-Fattah, and many of the supporters now crying "freedom of speech" signed a letter to the 2024 Perth Festival’s Literature and Ideas program calling for the removal of Jewish musician Deborah Conway over statements she made about the Gaza War.

She was also was a signatory on a letter to the Adelaide Festival in 2024 asking for the removal of Jewish American journalist and columnist Thomas Friedman after a blog post he wrote using examples from the animal kingdom to explain the Middle East. It was a glib and juvenile exercise, criticised for being racist and dehumanising. He later apologised.

Admittedly it was an “apology” about as effective as the non-apology issued by Nine newspapers this week over the deeply problematic cartoon by Wilcox, seemingly suggesting the “Zionist cabal” (cue octopus tentacle imagery) was responsible for coordinating the movement in favour of the Royal Commission into the Bondi terrorist attacks. 

We believe in free speech, or we don't

Thomas Friedman is a sometimes-controversial figure but a well-informed and outspoken journalist. The Adelaide Festival has claimed his invitation was not rescinded, although he has now spoken out to say he did not withdraw from the 2024 event of his own volition but was uninvited by organisers, who told him the timing would not work.

Despite everything, these invitations shouldn’t have been withdrawn, because we either believe in freedom of speech or we don’t. Though I do wonder how those now pulling out of the festival reconcile Abdel-Fattah’s rhetoric and hypocrisy with their desire to defend free speech. 

This entire affair smacks of those who signed an open letter calling on Creative Australia to reverse its decision to remove Khaled Sabsabi as the artist representing Australia at the Venice Biennale (as they should have). However,  more than 200 of the very same people signed a letter calling for Israel’s Biennale artist Ruth Patir to be removed.) 

So, they believe in artistic freedom, but only for some?  

Should Iranian artists be banned because their government imprisons women for not having their heads covered?

Should American artists be banned because Republicans are letting women die of sepsis rather than have an abortion?  

Should Australian artists be cancelled for living in a stolen country where Aboriginal people are dying in prison and some communities don’t even have clean water? 

Cultural safety

The director of Adelaide Writers' Week Louise Adler has now resigned in protest at the Adelaide Festival board’s decision to cancel Abdel-Fattah.

Adler, who has made her anti-Israel position very clear, previously programmed controversial activist/writers Mohammed El-Kurd (who has engaged in extensive propaganda and blood libels in his writing) and Susan Abulhawa (who has also engaged in blood libels and become a Russian apologist, describing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as a "depraved Zionist trying to ignite World War III”.)

Former board member Tony Berg is reported to have resigned due to alleged bias in programming, describing Adler as choosing writers who have “a vendetta against Israel and Zionism”.

Certainly, if you’re looking for balance in views or politics, programming like this would not encourage any self-identified Zionist to attend if they were to be invited. They would be justified in seeing the Adelaide Writers’ Week as culturally unsafe for Zionists.

This is a position for which Abdel-Fattah has expressly advocated. (“If you are a Zionist, you have no claim or right to cultural safety. And it is my duty as somebody who fights all forms of oppression and violence to deny you a safe space to espouse your Zionist racist ideology,” she posted on social media.)  

Not that they’re being invited, as the arts sector more broadly grapples with anti-Jewish hate and exclusion.  

Since October 7, Abdel-Fattah has engaged in rape denialism, apparent celebration of the events of October 7 (which as we know saw the murder and kidnapping of children and other civilians) with a social media post glorifying the terrorists who parachuted over the boarder to commit war crimes and engaged in a prolonged and persistent campaign of hate-filled rhetoric and abject hypocrisy, with a cognitive dissonance that’s hard to fathom. 

She was part of the team who circulated the WhatsApp transcript and file containing a spreadsheet, identifying the people whose names appeared in the transcript, their jobs, private information and more, including my own name and details, despite never being in the WhatsApp group in question.

But she has never been convicted of any hate crime and, despite how offensive I and many others find her propaganda and hate, she has a right to speak.

A voice of reason

Lest you believe that there is no one able to hold more than one truth in today’s Australia, a small statement appeared on Facebook over the weekend that gave me hope. 

National treasure, poet Andy Jackson, is one of the authors who has withdrawn from Adelaide, published his letter to Adler with the caveat, "I do not want my decision to be taken as approval of the stated public views of Dr Randa Abdel-Fatah, which I personally do not find productive. I do not want to be recruited or labelled as “for” anything apart from peace, dialogue, compassion and creative thought." 

I wonder whether there is room in Australian literary spaces to hold more than one truth and have an honest and open conversation about whether any of the authors pulling out don’t agree with Abdel-Fattah’s rhetoric but feel obligated to pull out of the festival for what could be a multitude of potential reasons. 

Lists of which authors have pulled out and which are now circulating on social media, in epic McCarthyist-style intimidation. Legitimate activism can take many forms: bullying isn’t one of them. 

I find Randa Abdel-Fattah’s rhetoric abhorrent. It is my opinion that her hyperbole is intellectually disingenuous, and ethically and morally questionable. I believe, based on her writings and social media, her interest appears to be in conflict, hypocrisy and fomenting anti-Jewish sentiment. 

But I will still go to my grave defending her right to free speech as well as my right to rebut her assertions where I consider it appropriate or to simply not to listen to or engage with her spite-filled diatribes. 

Just three days after the Bondi terror attack, Abdel-Fattah posted on Instagram, addressing the people who had “quickly surrendering to the agenda of those who are using a horrific act of antisemitism to perpetuate and entrench anti-Palestinian racism”.

The first line of the post’s caption was, “Now is the time to insist on principles not abandon them.”

If you genuinely believe in freedom of speech or artistic freedom, you cannot be selective about who gets to enjoy it. Living your ideals in the real world is challenging. 

In the immortal words of Tom Hanks in the film A League of Their Own: “It's supposed to be hard…If it were easy, everyone would do it.” 

You might also like
  • Brazilian Jews treated as pawns in presidential election
    Karina Stange Calandrin
  • What ‘Zionism’ means in Israel:  it’s not what you think
    Ittay Flescher
  • The hidden sting in the tail of Peter Beinart’s ‘dangerous’ idea
    Michael Visontay
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Isabelle oderberg
    NewsAustralia

    ‘The Jewish Independent’ commentary makes finals in Walkley journalism awards

    The Jewish Independent 1
    Emergency Exit
    FeatureAustralia

    Learning from the Jewish refugee story

    Peter Kohn
    Adelaide Hermann magicianHarvard_Theatre_Collection_-_Hermann_TCS_28
    FeatureArts & Culture

    Legendary magicians who made their Jewish identities disappear

    Nina Siegal

About the author

Isabelle Oderberg

Isabelle Oderberg

Isabelle Oderberg's journalism has appeared in The Age/SMH, Guardian, ABC, Meanjin and elsewhere. She also worked as a media and communications strategist across the not-for-profit sector. She is the author of Hard to Bear: Investigating the science and silence of miscarriage (Ultimo Press), and Chair of the Early Pregnancy Loss Coalition. Learn more at eplc.au.

More from the author

OpinionAustralia

The new McCarthyism: Anti-Zionist witch hunts

OpinionAustralia

‘Australian values’ – an immigration test with no answer

OpinionArts & Culture

I would have attended Bendigo Writers Festival… and said anything I liked