Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenWorld
AnalysisWorld

‘The day after’ may be coming in Iran: what would it mean for Israel?

Regime change, or even change within the regime, will require the Iranian people to overcome a leadership which has not yet shown any sign of weakness or readiness to compromise.
Dror Doron
Print this
Iran protest Getty

People gather during protest on January 8, 2026 in Tehran (Anonymous/Getty Images)

Published: 15 January 2026

Last updated: 16 January 2026

Middle East specialists have long speculated about the fall of Iran's revolutionary Islamic regime. Years of cultural repression against highly educated youth, widespread disillusionment with the revolution, and public repulsion toward a conservative, corrupt elite have all fuelled fires of dissent in the streets.

The violent events of the past two weeks, the worst the regime has ever faced since taking power in 1979, have ignited a renewed discourse about possible scenarios that could develop in a country with 92 million people and 3000 years of history. 

President Trump's public call to the protesters in the streets to “take over your institutions” and his promise that “help is on its way”, together with words from world leaders such as the German chancellor, who stated that the regime is in its "final days” add yet another sense of the imminent change. 

Nevertheless, caution is needed as it is practically impossible to foresee the outcomes of public unrest, and the regime might yet survive this current crisis, as it has done in previous waves of widespread demonstrations in 2009, 2017 and 2022.

An analytic approach to events, their possible outcomes, and implications could lead to numerous scenarios. However, the fact that the widespread demonstrations of the past few weeks lack any kind of nationally coordinated oppositional leadership complicates any assessment of the future developments in case the regime is subdued.

Return of exiled crown prince?

The first scenario to consider is the potential collapse of the regime, which may lead to the return of the exiled crown prince, Reza Pahlavi, and the re-establishment of the Western-affiliated monarchy that was overthrown in the 1979 revolution. Most analysts see this possibility as unrealistic. Even though officials from the Trump administration have met in recent days with Pahlavi, who for years voiced harsh criticism against the regime, his chances of reclaiming his seat seem slim as he lacks any domestic powerbase in Iran and the national memory of the autocratic and highly corrupt monarchy does not generate much support.

The return to power of Reza Pahlavi, who visited Israel numerous times and openly calls for the renewal of the close relations between the two countries, is, of course, the favoured option from Israel’s point of view. 

Scenario with Islamist Marxist group

A second scenario could be the rise to power of another exiled opposition force, the Mojahedin Khalq. This group, which promotes a vision of Islamic Marxism nationally, was a fierce critic of the monarchy during the ‘70s and was designated as a terror organisation due to its violent acts at the time.

Over recent decades, the Mojahedin Khalq took a central role in the fight against the Islamic regime in Tehran and carried out numerous terror attacks against it during the ‘80s. Today, the organization that operates from France, and is considered one of the most vocal voices against the regime, is presumed to have operational armed cells in Iran. 

The Mojahedin Khalq's Marxist orientation and its violent history prevent it from gaining substantial public support in Iran or being seen by the international community as an acceptable alternative to the current regime, and therefore, this scenario also seems to have limited prospects. 

However, based on past reports of operational cooperation between the Mojahedin Khalq and the Israeli Mossad against the Islamist regime, the Mojahedin Khalq taking power in Tehran could be seen as another reasonable alternative outcome from Israel’s perspective.

Reform from within

A third possibility could be a change within the regime rather than regime change. Among the current ruling elite in Iran, there are two main ideological currents: the conservatives, represented by the Supreme Leader and his close followers in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and the reformists, a group of more moderate politicians, such as the former presidents Hassan Rouhani and Mohammad Khatami.

The reformists accept the basic ideology and agenda of the Islamic revolution, but at the same time promote a more moderate vision of Islam, democracy and civil rights. 

This group presents a more accepting approach to West, including Israel, and calls for an internal change of the radical and strict policies promoted by the Supreme Leader in the past decades. The promotion of this group could be seen as an acceptable compromise that could bridge the ideological gap between the public and the current leadership.

Such a development could also lead to the opening of a new chapter in the relations between Iran and the West, reducing the risks that Iran poses today to Israel and to the regional stability.

Chaotic instability

Another scenario is that with the fall of the regime, Iran will enter an era of instability that, with the lack of any strong central authority, could cause the fragmentation of the country as we know it today. The fact that Iran’s population is a mosaic of different ethnic groups, with a 50% majority of Persians, but large minorities such as the Kurds and the Azeris in the north-west, Arabs along the western border with Iraq, and Sunni Baluchis in the east border near Pakistan, creates a fertile ground for the rise of separate movements.

Such a chaotic development will weaken Iran’s negative regional influence but could create new risks to Israel in the form of independent armed groups equipped with advanced Iranian-made weapons and military capabilities.

The events of the upcoming days and weeks in Iran could have a dramatic effect on the Middle East, as any change in Tehran’s political reality will have an impact far beyond the borders of Iran. Nevertheless, to bring about such a change will require the Iranian people to overcome the determined and brutal regime which clings to power in Tehran and which so far, has not shown any sign of weakness or readiness to compromise.

You might also like
  • Abuse by IDF soldiers humiliates Muslim Palestinians
    Ben Lynfield
  • Beinart takes a wrecking ball to Israel
    Michael Visontay
  • The illusion of Just War: Conflict ethics in Judaism, Christianity and Islam
    Dave Moskovitz
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Turkiye, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan sign trilateral defense pact
    AnalysisWorld

    New Saudi-Pakistan-Turkey alliance driven by failure of US to subdue Iran

    Dror Doron
    Jewish word map
    FeatureArts & Culture

    Was the barmi a shemozzle? How Australians use Jewish words 

    Caroline Hendy & Emma Breslow 1
    US President Donald Trump greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
    Israel Hamas WarAnalysisIsrael

    Netanyahu rejects Trump’s Gaza plan, testing US influence in the region

    Shahar Burla 2

About the author

Dror Doron

Dror Doron

Dror Doron is a senior political analyst specialising in the Middle East, and is a senior adviser at United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) focusing on Hezbollah and Lebanon.

More from the author

AnalysisWorld

New Saudi-Pakistan-Turkey alliance driven by failure of US to subdue Iran

AnalysisIsrael

Trump’s Hamas disarmament deal a mirage that’s quickly faded

AnalysisIsrael

Syria reimagined: From military threat to geostrategic competitor

AnalysisIsrael

Historic Israel-Lebanon agreement faces Iran’s weapons of disruption

Comments

No comments on this article yet. Be the first to add your thoughts.