Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenIsrael
Israel Votes 2026OpinionIsrael

Diaspora Jews can’t vote, but Israel’s election result will affect them

The world has become an ‘eighth front’ where the fight for Israel’s legitimacy can have life-changing impacts.
Vanina Vaisman-Levy
Print this
Diaspora election

Illustration: TJI

Published: 5 October 2026

Last updated: 5 October 2026

As Israel approaches one of the most consequential elections in its history, political debate has centred on national security, governance and domestic affairs. Yet one constituency will live with the repercussions of this election without casting a single vote: the millions of Jews living beyond Israel's borders. 

For decades, the relationship between Israel and the Diaspora was largely expressed through shared identity, philanthropy, advocacy and solidarity. October 7 fundamentally altered that equation. The question is no longer simply whether the Diaspora stands with Israel; it is how Jews around the world live with the consequences of decisions made in Jerusalem while navigating their place in their own societies. 

In 2015, then-President Reuven Rivlin offered one of the most compelling visions of modern Jewish peoplehood. Building on his idea of the Four Tribes in Israel’s changing society - secular, national-religious, ultra-Orthodox and Arab Israelis - he later embraced Diaspora Jewry as Israel's Fifth Tribe. It was a novel proposition. Jews living outside Israel were not supporters from afar; they were partners in a national story. Their connection with Israel was rooted not in citizenship, but in a sense of shared destiny. 

Today, that vision feels remarkably prophetic. 

The aftermath of October 7 has demonstrated how developments in Israel reverberate far beyond the country itself. Around the world, Jews have found themselves expected to explain, defend or distance themselves from Israel’s military actions and political rhetoric. Universities, workplaces, civic institutions and even private interactions have become places where Jewish identity is conflated with the conduct of the Israeli state. 

The distinction between Jewish and Israeli identities has become increasingly blurred. 

This new reality has given rise to what has become known as Israel's Eighth Front. Unlike Israel’s traditional fronts, defined by geography and military threats, the Eighth Front is transnational. It is fought not on battlefields, but through advocacy, education, legal challenges, diplomacy and the daily resilience of Jewish life. It is the arena in which Jewish communities defend Israel’s legitimacy while simultaneously confronting hostility in their everyday lives. 

But the Eighth Front has also exposed a profound dilemma. 

Many Diaspora Jews feel an enduring attachment to Israel while not necessarily supporting, and at times strongly opposing, the policies of its elected government. Since the establishment of the state, an unwritten covenant assumed that Jews living outside Israel should refrain from criticising Israeli politics because they did not share the country's security burden. That assumption has become harder to sustain. 

Jews living outside Israel may not vote in Israel’s elections, but they nevertheless experience social, personal and, in some cases, physical consequences arising from the actions of its government. They are asked to account for policies they neither formulated nor endorsed while navigating the tensions between their Jewish identity, their connection to Israel and their place in their own countries. 

The tension lies in reconciling enduring solidarity with the Jewish state with legitimate disagreement with its government. 

This raises a deeper question: what responsibility does Israel hold towards Jews beyond its borders? Its Basic Law defines Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people and explicitly affirms a connection between the state and Jews in the Diaspora. If Israel defines itself as the nation-state of the Jewish people, then the relationship should also involve a measure of reciprocity: recognition that the welfare, security and standing of Jews outside Israel form part of the wider Jewish reality in which the state operates. 

This is not to suggest that Israel should base its national security strategy according to protests abroad, international headlines or campus activism. The foremost obligation of any government is to protect its own citizens. However, that principle does not diminish another truth: the language, conduct and moral leadership of Israel’s elected representatives have a profound impact throughout the Jewish world. 

World Jewry has long mobilised for Israel in moments of crisis, raised funds and defended its legitimacy internationally. That solidarity remains indispensable. But the post-October 7 reality has exposed the limits of a relationship in which support flows predominantly in one direction.  

Israeli public opinion appears to recognise this emerging reality. An Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) survey conducted in June 2026 found that 56% of Israeli Jews believed Israel should take the risk of antisemitism affecting Diaspora Jewry into account to a great or moderate extent, while 13% believed it should be a very great consideration. The findings suggest that Israelis acknowledge the importance of incorporating the concerns of Diaspora Jewry but view them as one consideration among many rather than a determining factor. This nuanced public understanding is not always reflected among decision-makers, where the implications of rising global antisemitism can appear peripheral to broader national interests. 

Much of the electoral debate has understandably focused on domestic and strategic priorities, governance and the future of Israeli society. Yet the incoming government will also inherit a responsibility that extends beyond its own citizens. It must remain mindful that its policies, its rhetoric and the example set by its leadership shape the lived experience of millions throughout the Jewish world. 

This election comes at a moment when the boundaries between Israel’s national responsibilities and its broader role within the Jewish world are being reconsidered. It will test how the nation-state understands its place within the global Jewish people and whether the experience of the Eighth Front leads to a deeper recognition of the responsibilities that accompany that role.  

Only Israelis will cast their ballots on 27 October 2026. The implications, however, will be felt by Jews around the world. 

You might also like
  • One year after the ceasefire, Gaza remains in ruins with no solution in sight
    Shahar Burla
  • Three years after Oct 7: an anniversary of reckoning
    The Jewish Independent
  • Even on October 7, we are not united
    Ittay Flescher
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Fauda
    Israel Hamas WarAnalysisArts & Culture

    Fauda and the illusion of vengeance

    Ittay Flescher 1
    Passengers From Diverted Flydubai Flight To Arrive In Israel
    FeatureIsrael

    How ‘jihadist terror attack’ was averted on Israel-bound flight

    Tomer Almagor 2
    UN Netanyahu
    Israel Votes 2026FeatureIsrael

    Netanyahu’s lightning UN visit reveals his growing isolation

    Shahar Burla 3

About the author

Vanina Vaisman-Levy

Vanina Vaisman-Levy

Vanina Vaisman-Levy is an Israeli lawyer and postgraduate researcher in the field of Migration and Jewish Diaspora communities with a focus on comparative studies at the University of Sydney.

More from the author

AnalysisAustralia

October 7 profoundly changed the Australian Jewish community