Published: 13 August 2026
Last updated: 13 August 2026
The political left has embraced Peter Beinart’s book Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza with enthusiasm.
Once a prominent liberal Zionist, Beinart’s Gaza analysis, released late last year, positions him as an opponent of Israel more broadly. He argues that Israel’s destruction of Gaza was so brutal and excessive that the whole national project is beyond moral repair.
The book asks Jews to rethink what Jewish identity stands for, and to cast off their reflexive solidarity with Israel. In doing so, Beinart has expanded his long-standing criticism of Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian people into an ethical and existential critique.
It has also put the New York-based journalist in high demand from literary and cultural festivals, with Australia at the forefront. Beinart was a headline guest at the 2025 Sydney Writers' Festival, where his book was second on the festival’s non-fiction bestseller list (behind The Eyes of Gaza, by Plestia Alaqad), and he has now been invited back to speak at the Festival of Dangerous Ideas in Sydney on August 23.
The director of the Festival frames Beinart’s session as follows: “For decades, many Jews believed they could reconcile liberal values with unwavering support for the State of Israel. That consensus is now at risk of being undermined as Jews confront questions once considered unthinkable: What does solidarity mean in the face of mass civilian suffering? And what happens when a government enacts policies that violate ethical ideals that lie at the core of a people’s identity?”
In essence, Beinart says that the Netanyahu government’s actions have put the whole country beyond the pale, and it is time for Jews to unravel the heartstrings that are attached to Israel and find a different centre of Jewish gravity. In short, to become “non-Zionist”. That is, not against the idea of a Jewish state but to cast that state adrift from its central role in their identity.






Comments3
Simon14 August at 06:46 pm
Why has Beinart changed? Just to sell tickets?
Phil Armit14 August at 05:48 am
Hello Michael. I thought that I heard Peter B say that his main objection to Israel as it exists now, was about its being a state that legalises discrimination based on ethno-religious grounds, wherein non-Jews have fewer or lesser rights than Jewish people. I’m pretty sure I heard him say that this was his main objection.
Mark Ian13 August at 08:02 am
The Israel is Villa in an oasis of Violent Jihadi Tribes statement by many pro-Peace Leftist Humanitarians crushed by the murder-suicide bombings that killed and severely injured thousands of Israelis from 1995 to 2015 of the Second Intifada was reinforced exponentially by the barbarity of the murders and atrocities perpetrated by Hamas on October 7 2023 .
The IDF counterattack was ruthless and for many excessive but warnings and evacuations as in before the battle of Rafah when one million and several hundred thousand Gazan civilians with Hamas Terrorists amongst them limited the civilian death toll drastically but not civilian suffering .
The Humanitarian Enclaves did not match with the 1949 Geneva Conventions because Israelis were enraged by betrayal of the truce and guilt over failing to prevent the catastrophe.
History reminds us to remember the capacity of Humanity to descend into Barbarism regularly.