Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
Israel Hamas WarAnalysisAustralia

The hidden sting in the tail of Peter Beinart’s ‘dangerous’ idea

The Festival of Dangerous Ideas is bringing Peter Beinart back to Australia. What is his new idea and to whom is it dangerous?
Michael Visontay
Print this
Beinart SWF

Peter Beinart at the 2025 Sydney Writers’ Festival (SWF)

Published: 13 August 2026

Last updated: 13 August 2026

The political left has embraced Peter Beinart’s book Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza with enthusiasm.

Once a prominent liberal Zionist, Beinart’s Gaza analysis, released late last year, positions him as an opponent of Israel more broadly. He argues that Israel’s destruction of Gaza was so brutal and excessive that the whole national project is beyond moral repair.

The book asks Jews to rethink what Jewish identity stands for, and to cast off their reflexive solidarity with Israel. In doing so, Beinart has expanded his long-standing criticism of Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian people into an ethical and existential critique.

It has also put the New York-based journalist in high demand from literary and cultural festivals, with Australia at the forefront. Beinart was a headline guest at the 2025 Sydney Writers' Festival, where his book was second on the festival’s non-fiction bestseller list (behind The Eyes of Gaza, by Plestia Alaqad), and he has now been invited back to speak at the Festival of Dangerous Ideas in Sydney on August 23.

The director of the Festival frames Beinart’s session as follows: “For decades, many Jews believed they could reconcile liberal values with unwavering support for the State of Israel. That consensus is now at risk of being undermined as Jews confront questions once considered unthinkable: What does solidarity mean in the face of mass civilian suffering? And what happens when a government enacts policies that violate ethical ideals that lie at the core of a people’s identity?”

In essence, Beinart says that the Netanyahu government’s actions have put the whole country beyond the pale, and it is time for Jews to unravel the heartstrings that are attached to Israel and find a different centre of Jewish gravity. In short, to become “non-Zionist”. That is, not against the idea of a Jewish state but to cast that state adrift from its central role in their identity.

How would that look? Well, we have a thriving example right here in Australia. The Bundist Labor movement in Melbourne, which has been going strong for nearly 100 years, is built on a secular Jewish identity through Yiddish language and culture. To the Bundists, Israel has never been the centre of their Jewish world. So there already is a model for Beinart’s vision, though it does not share the same angry rejection that drives his proposition.

Peter Beinart with the cover of his book
Peter Beinart with the cover of his book

Argument is fashionable but is it radical?

Beinart’s critique is certainly fashionable, but is it “dangerous” or radical? Many Diaspora Jews have long been shaking their heads at Netanyahu’s leadership, in Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, and at home. They also look on with dismay at the rise of extremist religious leaders and settler violence. But their ambivalence is directed at the leaders, not the entire society. Because there are multiple rotten apples visible across the top of the crate, Beinart contends that the whole crate is rotten.

At the heart of his argument, however, lies a flaw. He argues for a rejection of solidarity with Israel – the state, the society, the people – on the basis of the Israeli government’s actions in Gaza, and its treatment of Palestinians on the West Bank.

Benjamin Netanyahu and his government are not Israel and they do not represent all Israelis. The society is much more diverse and nuanced than its right-wing militaristic leadership. There has been significant opposition to the government’s actions, well before Hamas and Gaza, but also since the war. Yet Beinart implies that through the accumulated passage of time, over several elections and ongoing occupation, the government represents all of Israel, that the society is so contaminated that it does not deserve any solidarity, that there is no hope of renewal from its shift to the religious Right.

He has conflated the government with its people, holding the flaws of one permanently indivisible from the other. Would he reach that conclusion with other ugly countries? With Russia? With China? Would Beinart ask Americans and others in the liberal West to do the same with their relationship to his country, to the whole American state and national project based on its current government’s belligerence and cruelty to the vulnerable at home and abroad?

Israel envisioned as part of a larger political entity

The dangerous idea in Beinart’s book might just be the part that the festival has not highlighted in its promotion. The author’s own solution to reimagining his relationship with Israel is not to remake an identity without Israel as its centre, but to remake Israel itself, with Jews and Palestinians living side by side with equal rights to self-determination under the law, in a confederation, binational state or something similar.

“We can lift the weight that oppressing Palestinians imposes on Jewish Israelis, and indirectly, on Jews around the world … We can lay down the burden of seeing ourselves as the perennial victims of a Jew-hating world,” he writes.

While the idea of a new Jewish identity, one that transcends victimhood, has a certain “John Lennon Imagine” appeal, this call to action goes beyond non-Zionist to being anti-Zionist, in that he is rejecting the idea of a national Jewish homeland as it currently exists.

It is also hard to see who wants Israelis and Palestinians to live side by side in one state or political arrangement.

Right-wing Israeli Jews? They don’t want Palestinians to have a state at all, much less share theirs with them.

Liberal Jews? They believe in a two-state solution.

Palestinians? They don’t want to live with Israelis. They want their own state.

That leaves pro-Palestinian anti-Zionist advocates, who like the idea of bending a national homeland for Jews into something else.

No doubt Beinart will be able to clarify these complicated themes at his session.

For those interested in the more conventional but no less fraught subject of antisemitism, the Festival of Dangerous Ideas will hold a panel session on this subject with Ruth Balint, Associate Professor of History at the University of New South Wales, David Slucki, Associate Professor in Contemporary Jewish Life and Culture at Monash University and Sarah Schwartz, co-CEO of the Jewish Council of Australia. The discussion will be moderated by Simon Longstaff, from The Ethics Centre.

Click Here for session details and tickets

You might also like
  • Tame apologises – but with little grace
    Deborah Stone
  • Confronting Richard Flanagan and the myth of the Israel lobby
    Mary Garden
  • UK’s dramatic policy change on Israel-Palestine
    Colin Shindler
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    ANNIKA WELLS PRESSER
    Israel Hamas WarNewsAustralia

    No action to stop Hezbollah ally beaming antisemitic and anti-Israel content into Australia

    Michael Visontay
    Generation Change: Rachel Moshel
    Generation ChangeInterviewArts & Culture

    Rachel Moshel: Creating a space for Jewish art and joy

    Gideon Cohen
    Beinart Doogue 600
    Israel Hamas WarNewsAustralia

    Beinart takes a wrecking ball to Israel

    Michael Visontay 2

About the author

Michael Visontay

Michael Visontay

Michael Visontay is Commissioning Editor of TJI and was Editor-in-Chief from 2017-22. Michael is a former Assistant Editor of The Sydney Morning Herald and columnist with The Australian Jewish News. He has written six books, including Who Gave You Permission? with Manny Waks, and Welcome to Wanderland: Western Sydney Wanderers and the Pride of the West. His most recent book is Noble Fragments: the Maverick who broke up the world's greatest book (Scribe, 2024).

More from the author

ReflectionWorld

My memory of Gloria Steinem

NewsAustralia

No action to stop Hezbollah ally beaming antisemitic and anti-Israel content into Australia

NewsAustralia

Beinart takes a wrecking ball to Israel

AnalysisAustralia

Prime minister’s absence exposes weakness in Royal Commission hearings

Comments3

  • Avatar of Simon

    Simon14 August at 06:46 pm

    Why has Beinart changed? Just to sell tickets?

  • Avatar of Phil Armit

    Phil Armit14 August at 05:48 am

    Hello Michael. I thought that I heard Peter B say that his main objection to Israel as it exists now, was about its being a state that legalises discrimination based on ethno-religious grounds, wherein non-Jews have fewer or lesser rights than Jewish people. I’m pretty sure I heard him say that this was his main objection.

  • Avatar of Mark Ian

    Mark Ian13 August at 08:02 am

    The Israel is Villa in an oasis of Violent Jihadi Tribes statement by many pro-Peace Leftist Humanitarians crushed by the murder-suicide bombings that killed and severely injured thousands of Israelis from 1995 to 2015 of the Second Intifada was reinforced exponentially by the barbarity of the murders and atrocities perpetrated by Hamas on October 7 2023 .
    The IDF counterattack was ruthless and for many excessive but warnings and evacuations as in before the battle of Rafah when one million and several hundred thousand Gazan civilians with Hamas Terrorists amongst them limited the civilian death toll drastically but not civilian suffering .
    The Humanitarian Enclaves did not match with the 1949 Geneva Conventions because Israelis were enraged by betrayal of the truce and guilt over failing to prevent the catastrophe.
    History reminds us to remember the capacity of Humanity to descend into Barbarism regularly.