Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenIsrael
Israel Iran WarAnalysisIsrael

Iran-Israel war puts Saudi Arabia in a difficult position

Saudi Arabia might have been expected to applaud Israel's attack on Iran, but an enemy's enemy isn't always a friend.
Michal Yaari
Print this
Khamenei Bin Laden

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei (L) and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman (TJI Composite/Creative Commons)

Published: 17 June 2025

Last updated: 17 June 2025

During an interview with the ״The Atlantic״ in 2018, the Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman, compared Khamenei to Hitler. This statement expressed the dramatic change in the Saudi policy towards Iran.

Over the years, the Saudi leadership saw the Islamic Republic and its ideology as the biggest threat to the region and to the kingdom in particular, but at the same time it took a conciliatory line towards the ayatollahs' regime.The recognition of Saudi Arabia's security and strategic inferiority compared to Iran, along with the royal family's consistent avoidance of being drawn into regional conflicts, has led to a restrained and cautious policy toward its neighbour. Bin Salman's words marked a clear end to the era of Saudi restraint. No more moderate and measured language, but quite the opposite: public statements against Tehran, accompanied and backed by proactive actions (for example: forming regional coalitions).

Gaza created a shared interest

However, this policy also came to an end, perhaps sooner than expected.  Saudi Arabia's nearly decade-long war of attrition in Yemen exacted a heavy, perhaps too heavy price, without any significant results. In 2023, Tehran and Riyadh announced the renewal of their relations, each driven by its own interests. Since then, a series of high-level meetings between senior officials from both countries has signalled the beginning of a new era.

The war in Gaza should have set back the renewed dialogue and highlighted the deep divisions in the interests of the two regional powers, which are reflected in three main areas:

1. Attitudes toward Hamas: Iran provides ideological and financial support to Hamas, whereas Saudi Arabia regards the Palestinian Authority as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. Moreover, from the Saudi perspective, the October 7 terrorist attack served as clear evidence of the dangers inherent in Hamas’s actions .

2. Attitude towards Israel: While Iran calls for the destruction of Israel, Saudi Arabia was one step away from signing a peace treaty with it shortly before the war.

3. Relations with the US: Iran sees the U.S. as the "Great Satan" and has long faced American-led sanctions. Saudi Arabia, in contrast, is a longstanding U.S. strategic partner with deep ties to Washington.

Not only did their differing positions on these issues fail to cool relations, quite the opposite. A series of diplomatic collaborations, ranging from participation in joint conferences, to direct phone calls between Riyadh and Tehran, and meetings between the foreign ministers of both countries, all indicated, at least outwardly, that common ground outweighed their differences.

Both countries describe Israel's military actions in Gaza as war crimes and share a mutual concern about the destructive impact that continued Israeli operations in Gaza could have on the broader Middle East.

Saudis have reason to fear Israel's strike on Iran

The absurdity reached its peak with the Israeli strike on Iran, that began on June 13, 2025. Although this move clearly served Saudi interests, the royal family chose to condemn Israel. For many Israelis, the Saudi response was surprising and infuriating. How could Saudi Arabia, which undoubtedly benefits from a severe blow to its greatest enemy, choose to extend a hand to the aggressor rather than the victim?

However, a closer look at Saudi Arabia’s interests may shed light on the logic behind its response:

  1. From the Saudi perspective, it is undeniable that the IDF and Israel’s intelligence and security services have demonstrated impressive capabilities. However, these same forces are also responsible for the ongoing and unbearable suffering of the Palestinians in Gaza. This means that the success of the Israeli military operation cannot be viewed separately from what is happening in the occupied territories. Any expression of appreciation or recognition for the Israeli strike in Iran is likely to provoke strong reactions across the Arab and Muslim world and risk being seen as support for the Zionist occupier.

  2. Despite its massive investment in the military over the years, Saudi Arabia is unwilling to put its strategic capabilities to the test. The royal family prioritizes preserving the status quo, even if it is fragile and far from ideal. A direct confrontation between Iran and Israel poses a serious threat to the kingdom’s security, as Saudi Arabia fears a harsh Iranian response, if it is perceived as having played a role in the attack.

  3. The Israeli attack on Iran, even if justified and aligned with Saudi Arabia's security interests, carries the risk of escalation and unpredictable nightmare scenarios. Just as the war in Gaza triggered developments no one foresaw (some of which benefited Saudi Arabia, while others did not), a direct confrontation between Israel and Iran could very well intensify and expand the security challenges facing the kingdom.
  4. Moreover, if Iran decides to retaliate by targeting American assets in the Middle East, the United States will likely be compelled to respond. In such a scenario, Washington may call on the Saudi royal family to take an active role in the conflict, potentially dragging the status quo-oriented kingdom into a war it sought to avoid.
  5. It is not an unlikely scenario that, in response to the Israeli attack, Iran could block the Strait of Hormuz or even target oil facilities in Saudi Arabia in an attempt to destabilize the global energy market. In this context, even if Saudi Arabia quietly welcomes Israeli action in Iran and views it as a significant strategic step to weaken Iranian capabilities, that support is mixed with deep concerns about what lies ahead.

Above all, the critical question remains whether Israel will be able to translate its military operations into a long-term political strategy. Without converting military gains into diplomatic progress, there is a real risk that the Israeli-Iranian front will devolve into yet another war of attrition, with uncertain outcomes, but already devastating consequences.

You might also like
  • Tame apologises – but with little grace
    Deborah Stone
  • Confronting Richard Flanagan and the myth of the Israel lobby
    Mary Garden
  • UK’s dramatic policy change on Israel-Palestine
    Colin Shindler
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Woman with land and houses behind her
    NewsAustralia

    Australia to increase sanctions against West Bank settlements

    Deborah Stone 2
    Netanyahu
    Israel Hamas WarFeatureIsrael

    New evidence Netanyahu was warned about October 7

    Shahar Burla 2
    Segalovitz Abbas
    Israel Votes 2026AnalysisIsrael

    Segalovitz decision to join Arab party is a paradigm change for Israel

    Eetta Prince-Gibson

About the author

Michal Yaari

Michal Yaari

Dr Michal Yaari, an expert on Saudi foreign policy at Tel Aviv University, is a member of the panel of experts at the Israeli Peace Initiative, an Israeli non-profit dedicated to promoting a regional peace agreement.

More from the author

AnalysisWorld

Saudi nuclear deal fiasco: what was Trump thinking?

AnalysisIsrael

Qatar diplomatic fine line survives, even after Iranian attacks

AnalysisIsrael

Normalisation, Palestine, stability: Saudi Arabia’s agenda

Comments

No comments on this article yet. Be the first to add your thoughts.