Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenIsrael
Israel Hamas WarExplainerIsrael

‘A dangerous precedent’: US blocks Abbas as Palestine recognition looms

Washington’s decision to block Mahmoud Abbas from the UN General Assembly sets a risky precedent that threatens the UN’s credibility and strains US alliances.
TJI Wrap
Print this
Mahmoud Abbas, President of Palestine, speaks at the United Nations General Assembly in 2024. The US has blocked him attending when several nations are expected to recognise Palestine this month

Mahmoud Abbas, President of Palestine, speaks at the United Nations General Assembly in 2024. The US has blocked him attending when several nations are expected to recognise Palestine this month (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Published: 2 September 2025

Last updated: 2 September 2025

The US is denying a visa to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas for UN General Assembly – a significant and controversial move ahead of the global summit where several countries are expected to recognise a Palestinian state.

Abbas is also scheduled to attend a summit at UN headquarters hosted by France and Saudi Arabia, during which Britain, France, Australia and Canada are planning to formally recognise a Palestinian state.

The State Department announced on Friday that it is “denying and revoking visas” from members of the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). A State Department official confirmed that “Abbas is affected by this action along with approximately 80 other PA officials.”

In announcing the move, the State Department accused the PA and the PLO of taking steps that “materially contributed to Hamas’s refusal to release its hostages, and to the breakdown of the Gaza ceasefire talks.” “Before we take them seriously as partners in peace, the PA and PLO must completely reject terrorism and stop counterproductively pursuing the unilateral recognition of a hypothetical state,” deputy spokesperson Tommy Pigott said on X.

The move also appears to be a further step to punish those involved in international tribunals’ probes of alleged crimes committed by Israel. “The PA must also end its attempts to bypass negotiations through international lawfare campaigns, including appeals to the ICC and ICJ, and efforts to secure the unilateral recognition of a conjectural Palestinian state,” Friday’s statement added.

Is Washington’s decision lawful?

The 1947 agreement between the United Nations and the United States on the operation of UN headquarters in New York prohibits the US from restricting access to representatives of member states, UN officials and anyone invited by the UN. Although the Palestinian Authority only has observer status, this protection should extend to Abbas and other PA officials if formally invited.

The State Department now cites national security and a 2014 law allowing denial of visas to foreign representatives linked to terrorism or espionage. US officials argue the PA undermines peace through prisoner payments, October 7, and appeals to international courts. The law, passed by Congress in 2014, amended the Foreign Relations Authorization Act to permit denial of entry to foreign representatives engaged in espionage, terrorism or actions threatening US national security. Whether Abbas and his delegation meet this threshold remains legally uncertain, concludes Jeremy Sharon in The Times of Israel.

In 1988, the US denied Yasser Arafat a visa, prompting the General Assembly to relocate to Geneva. The International Court of Justice ruled that the US was bound by the Headquarters Agreement, although the case never reached a definitive ruling.

'A dangerous precedent'

"Beyond the diplomatic aspect of the ban, blocking Abbas’ participation in the General Assembly constitutes a dangerous precedent that could damage the UN’s credibility as an international institution. If the state hosting the UN denies representatives of a recognised people access, it undermines not only Palestinian representation, but the very essence of the organisation," writes Jack Khoury in Haaretz.

The decision also reinforces the perception that the US can no longer serve as an impartial broker for any diplomatic process. Whoever prevents Palestinians from accessing the UN cannot credibly claim to act as mediator. In a broader view, the decision is also a slap in the face to the countries that have already recognised Palestinian rights and statehood. It signals that Washington considers siding with Ramallah to be a hostile act.

This outcome has wide-ranging implications, especially for Saudi Arabia, Khoury continues. Riyadh is seeking to redefine its diplomatic path, including making historic concessions to Israel. Yet Washington’s decision suggests that even such significant steps are insufficient for the US to acknowledge Palestinian aspirations for self-determination at the UN.

Khoury argues, the US risks straining its partnerships with key regional allies: “The move, weeks away from the UN General Assembly, reflects a core worldview of the Trump administration – complete delegitimisation of the Palestinian leadership and the setting of almost impossible conditions to renew any diplomatic pathway.”

International responses

Israeli officials, including Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar and UN Ambassador Danny Danon, praised the move. After the announcement, Sa’ar thanked Trump and Rubio “for holding the PLO and PA accountable for rewarding terrorism, incitement and efforts to use legal warfare against Israel.”

The Palestinian presidency said in a statement that it “deeply regrets” the decision, which “stands in clear contradiction to international law and the UN Headquarters Agreement,” and called on the US to reconsider. The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), which has 57 member states including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Egypt, Indonesia and Pakistan, also condemned the decision, calling it “discriminatory.”

Stéphane Dujarric, spokesperson for UN Secretary-General António Guterres, said the UN would engage with the US “in line with the UN Headquarters Agreement between the UN and the US.” He expressed hope the issue would be resolved, adding that it was vital that all member states and permanent observers, including Palestine, be represented — particularly in this case, as there will be a session dedicated to the two-state solution hosted by France and Saudi Arabia.

European countries also criticised the ban. Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez described the decision as “unjust,” writing on X: “Palestine has the right to make its voice heard at the United Nations and in all international forums.” France, one of the countries due to recognise a Palestinian state, declared: “A UN General Assembly meeting should not be subject to any restrictions on access,” Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said at a meeting in Denmark. Palestinian Ambassador to the UN Riyad Mansour said, “we will see exactly what it means and how it applies to any of our delegation, and we will respond accordingly.”

What next?

The UN could bring a case against the US at the International Court of Justice to compel it to allow Palestinian representatives entry, though this is unlikely given the political sensitivities. Member states could instead relocate the General Assembly meeting — or at least the two-state solution session — to Geneva, as happened in 1988 when Arafat was denied entry. On that occasion, the Assembly voted 151 to 2, with the UK abstaining, to allow Arafat to address the body in Geneva, a move widely seen as a diplomatic embarrassment for Washington.

Another possibility is that Abbas or other PA leaders may participate virtually via Zoom.

While the UN has limited leverage over Washington, Saudi Arabia — a leading advocate for collective recognition of Palestinian statehood — retains significant influence through its financial ties with the US and the region, argues Liza Rozovsky in Haaretz. Excluding Palestinian leaders from an event hosted by Riyadh would hardly signal goodwill from Trump toward Mohammed bin Salman. Unless the step was prearranged, it is likely the matter is not yet closed.

The GREAT Gaza plan

Meanwhile, the Trump administration is reportedly considering a postwar reconstruction proposal for Gaza that would place the territory under US trusteeship for a decade and pay around a quarter of its population to permanently relocate.

According to The Washington Post, the Gaza Reconstitution, Economic Acceleration and Transformation Trust — the “GREAT Trust” — envisions the temporary relocation of Gaza’s more than two million residents, either through “voluntary” departures abroad or into restricted secured zones within the Strip.

The enclave would be administered under US trusteeship for 10 years, “until a reformed and deradicalised Palestinian polity is ready to step into its shoes.” During that period, investors would fund “mega-construction projects” including electric vehicle plants, data centres, resorts and high-rise housing.

The plan, however, ignores that forced population transfer violates international law, and none of the proposed host countries — Indonesia, South Sudan, Somaliland, Libya, Ethiopia or others — has agreed to participate, notes Ben Samuels in Haaretz. Whatever the guise of financial incentives, from relocation packages to rent or food subsidies, such measures would still constitute violations of international law.

READ MORE

US blocks Palestinian president from attending UN General Assembly (Barak Ravid, Axios)

What Trump signals to the world by banning Palestinian leaders from the US (Jack Khoury, Haaretz)

Can the US legally ban Mahmoud Abbas and the PA from the UN General Assembly? (Jeremy Sharon, Times of Israel)

What's next for the UN after the US blocks Palestinian officials from attending General Assembly? (Liza Rozovsky, Haaretz)

GREAT Gaza plan: a trumpian get-rich-quick scheme reliant on war crimes, AI and tourism (Ben Samuels, Haaretz)

Israel weighs West Bank annexations in response to Palestine recognition push (Axios)

You might also like
  • ‘Israel is systemically eliminating Palestinian collective life’:  B’Tselem
    Deborah Stone
  • Tame apologises – but with little grace
    Deborah Stone
  • Confronting Richard Flanagan and the myth of the Israel lobby
    Mary Garden
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Rozana Beit Oula
    PeacebuildingOpinionIsrael

    Peacebuilding through the eyes of a sceptic

    Ron Finkel
    Netanyahu
    Israel Hamas WarFeatureIsrael

    New evidence Netanyahu was warned about October 7

    Shahar Burla 2
    Segalovitz Abbas
    Israel Votes 2026AnalysisIsrael

    Segalovitz decision to join Arab party is a paradigm change for Israel

    Eetta Prince-Gibson

About the author

TJI Wrap

TJI Wrap

TJI wraps consolidate essential news and analysis from multiple sources into digestable summaries.

More from the author

NewsAustralia

War crimes allegations against Australian IDF soldier

NewsWorld

Wave of attacks on Jewish sites sparks international alarm

AnalysisIsrael

Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iran: Israel’s tense security landscape

AnalysisIsrael

Middle East on edge as Iran and Israel inch closer to another war

Comments

No comments on this article yet. Be the first to add your thoughts.