Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenIsrael
AnalysisIsrael

ABCD: Four possible futures between the river and the sea

Alex Sinclair’s devastatingly simple analysis brings into stark relief the alternatives to continuing the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Deborah Stone
Print this
ABCD Israel maps futures

Potential solutions to the Israel-Palestine conflict (Alex Sinclair/TJI)

Published: 30 June 2025

Last updated: 30 June 2025

Despite the complexity of the history and the many dimensions of the current conflict, the possible futures for Israel-Palestine are few.

Dr Alex Sinclair has boiled them down to four words, conveniently starting with the letters A,B,C and D.

Sinclair, who is Chief Content Officer at Educating for Impact, and an adjunct lecturer at the Melton Centre of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, explained the four possible at Limmud Oz in Melbourne.

A is for Apartheid

The Jewish Independent

Failure to resolve the status of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza would create an apartheid Israel, with different regimes within pre-1967 borders, which has a majority Jewish population, and the West Bank's majority Palestinian areas.

Jews and Arabs would continue to have full equality in pre-1967 Israel. But Palestinians in parts of the West Bank would be subject to Israeli military governance, justice and army control while Jews in the settlements would be governed by Israel’s civil governance, justice and police system. This system currently applies in Area C, which comprises 61% of the West Bank, where most Jewish settlements are situated.

Sinclair acknowledges the inflammatory nature of the term “apartheid” but quotes former Mossad chief Tamir Pardo to justify the term. “In a territory where two people are judged under two legal systems, that is an apartheid state,”  Pardo told the Jerusalem Post in 2023.

B is for Binational State

The Jewish Independent

Also known as the “one-state solution”, a binational state posits the entire population, Jewish and Palestinian, living together under one system of government.

This state, which might be called Israel-Palestine, would include the whole region between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, what is currently Israel proper, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. It would be a multi-ethnic, multi-religious state operating in both Hebrew and Arabic with a population that is close to 50/50 Jewish and Palestinian, though the number of Palestinians is expected to grow and the proportion of Jews to shrink.

The model assumes the capacity of the two warring populations to live peaceably under a shared system. Many people believe it amounts to or would lead to the removal of Israel and its replacement with Palestine.

C is for Cleansing

The Jewish Independent

This extreme solution posits Israel taking control of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip but without the current Palestinian population.

While not even extremists have gone so far as to explicitly promote expelling entire populations, there is a strong subtext in favour of this options in the rhetoric of Religious Zionist leaders Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir. They have argued for totally destroying Gaza so that large swathes of the population will leave, and expanding settlements in the West Bank to squeeze out the Palestinian population.

The argument that Israel’s military actions in Gaza constitute genocide is based on the belief that Israel’s true military agenda is to significantly reduce the Palestinian population, rather than simple to remove the Hamas terrorists and their infrastructure.  

D is for Division

The Jewish Independent

The two-state solution first proposed at Oslo in 1993 remains on the table, despite its failure to come to fruition 20 years ago.

In various follow-up meetings, Israelis and Palestinians have worked toward a negotiated two-state solution, notably at the Camp David Summit of 2000 and the Olmert-Abbas negotiations of 2008.

The broad strokes of a viable potential future agreement were set out in the Geneva Accord in 2009:

  • End of conflict. End of all claims.
  • Mutual recognition of Israeli and Palestinian right to two separate states.
  • A final, agreed upon border.
  • A comprehensive solution to the refugee problem.
  • Large settlement blocks and most of the settlers are annexed to Israel, as part of a 1:1 land swap.
  • Recognition of the Jewish neighbourhoods in Jerusalem as the Israeli capital and recognition of the Arab neighbourhoods of Jerusalem as the Palestinian capital.
  • A demilitarised Palestinian state.
  • A comprehensive and complete Palestinian commitment to fighting terrorism and incitement.
  • An international verification group to oversee implementation
The Jewish Independent

Analyst Shaul Arieli argues division is the only solution which would allow Israel to remain both Jewish and democratic.

“The demographic and land data in the West Bank paint a clear picture: Palestinians hold a significant demographic majority and spatial dominance, both in terms of land ownership and built-up area. This reality presents annexation advocates with an insoluble dilemma: either losing the Jewish majority or giving up Israel's democratic character. Nevertheless, separation can be achieved through land swaps of about 4% of the West Bank's area.

“Such a solution would allow preserving 80% of the Israeli population currently living beyond the Green Line under Israeli sovereignty, while maintaining territorial continuity and the fabric of life for both Palestinians and Israelis.“

You might also like
  • Fighting for a better Israel 
    Peter Kohn
  • Where are the women in this election campaign?
    Eetta Prince-Gibson
  • Your Israel election cheat sheet
    Deborah Stone
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    U.S. President Donald Trump speaks with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Knesset
    Israel Votes 2026AnalysisIsrael

    Do Israelis care that Trump has endorsed Netanyahu?

    Ruth Eglash
    Young Israelis
    Israel Votes 2026FeatureIsrael

    Security fears and incitement drive young voters toward far-right

    Ben Lynfield 1
    Protest against settler violence in Jerusalem
    Israel

    Record spike in settler violence ahead of election

    Ben Lynfield

About the author

Deborah Stone

Deborah Stone

Deborah Stone is Editor-in-Chief of TJI. She has more than 30 years experience as a journalist and editor, including as a reporter and feature writer on The Age and The Sunday Age, as Editor of the Australian Jewish News and as Editor of ArtsHub.

More from the author

NewsAustralia

Alleged Helen Haines attacker wrote anti-Israel, pro-Iran posts

NewsWorld

Traditional antisemitic myths dominate online antisemitism: new study

NewsAustralia

Sydney Uni commissions independent review after ‘Globalise the Intifada’ campaign

NewsArts & Culture

Jerusalemites photos cancelled by Indian Festival