Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenIsrael
FeatureIsrael

Israel moves to shut foreign media outlets claiming ‘security threat’

Al-Jazeera and IDF Radio are among the outlets threatened by a raft of measures aimed at stifling criticism of the government.
Ben Lynfield
Print this
Al Jazeera TV studio

Published: 13 November 2025

Last updated: 13 November 2025

Despite the Israel-Hamas ceasefire in Gaza and the heightened, if fragile, sense of returning to normalcy in Israel, the government is using security arguments to move Israel further towards authoritarianism, claim critics.

This week saw the first reading of a Knesset bill that significantly broadens government powers to close foreign news organisations deemed security threats, now without judicial review. The government also dealt a major blow to the domestic media landscape by ordering the closure by March 1 of the defence ministry-supervised Galei Zahal (IDF Radio), which features some journalists critical of coalition policies.

In addition, three other attacks on media independence are underway: a bid to close the Kan public broadcaster, a bill that would harm news corporations, and a bill that critics say would turn regulators into hand-picked yes men of hard-right communications minister Shlomo Karhi.

Collectively, these efforts point to Israel’s once relatively free media coming under unprecedented strain in the run-up to elections planned for next year.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who faces an International Criminal Court arrest warrant for alleged Gaza war crimes abroad but a weak and divided opposition at home, is seeking a renewed mandate for his coalition, the most right-wing government in Israeli history.

“For the last three years, the government has done everything in its power to shut down the independent press in Israel,” Channel 13 investigative journalist Raviv Drucker told The Jewish Independent. “But they didn’t succeed so much. Now in the last months of this government they are trying to work very hard to achieve something.”

Karhi denies any antidemocratic intent, saying his moves give more expression to the views and needs of the majority of the country as expressed in the last elections.

The bill to ease closure of foreign outlets, passed by a 50-41 vote on Monday, would replace a temporary law passed in April 2024 with a broader, permanent law. The temporary law had been stipulated and promoted as an emergency wartime measure. The replacement law, if passed, can shut down foreign outlets at any time, whether there is a war emergency or not.

Law used against al-Jazeera

The temporary law was deployed against al-Jazeera, closing its Israel operations in May 2024 on the grounds that its broadcasts encouraged terrorism, something the broadcaster denied. The move was backed by the courts, but because there was no legal option of permanent closure, the state was forced to petition the courts repeatedly for extensions of the ban. Within the new bill, closure is until decided otherwise, namely it can be permanent.

Ariel Kallner, the legislator sponsoring the bill, casts it as Israeli self-defence against foreign enemies. “There is a need to defend state security from harm that arrives through foreign broadcast outlets,” he told TJI. “It is important to understand that the media is used as weapons of war in the hands of enemies that use it to spread propaganda of incitement, murder and death. Therefore, the law is aimed at preventing foreign media bodies from harming the security of Israel.”

Kallner added that the bill “also sets a clear, values-based stand that the state of Israel will not allow programming that poisons the hearts and minds of its enemies against [Israeli] citizens.”

But Israel’s leading opposition newspaper, Haaretz, said in an editorial on Wednesday that the real motive is to stifle media freedom. “Today it’s al-Jazeera, tomorrow the BBC and the day after tomorrow Haaretz” and other Israeli outlets. The editorial added that the bill “harms the core of media freedom and freedom of expression”.

Oren Persico, senior staffer at Israel’s leading media watchdog, the Seventh Eye, termed the bill  “extremist, stupid and destructive”. He warned that it could very easily be amended to include Israeli outlets that displease the government.

Persico predicted the bill would run into trouble because legal advisers to the Knesset and government have voiced objections. In the event that it does become law, it would likely be struck down by the Supreme Court, he said. The bill is now headed back to the national security committee, where it is to be readied for second and third readings.

Even if it dies, the process and discourse around the bill will have a “deterrent effect” on journalists and networks, Persico predicted. “It’s part of an anti-freedom atmosphere and it can cause self-censorship among foreign journalists in Israel.”

The Foreign Press Association had no immediate comment on the Knesset vote. It was expected to discuss its implications within several days at a meeting of its board.

IDF radio closed

The intent to close IDF Radio was announced on Tuesday by defence minister Israel Katz, who blasted the station, whose audience extends well beyond soldiers and is the country’s second most popular radio outlet, for purportedly deviating from its original mission. “IDF Radio was established by the government of Israel as a military station to be the mouth and ear of IDF soldiers and their families and not as a platform for many views that attack the IDF and its soldiers,” Katz said.

The commander of the station, Tal Lev Ram, who is seen as having made the station more independent in its programming than before, was quoted by Haaretz as saying Katz’s move was based on a flawed report by a committee whose members had conflicts of interest.

“We view this as a substantial, saddening and dramatic blow to the people’s army, Israeli society and media freedom in a democratic country.” The Israel Journalists Association is among several organizations vowing to overturn the decision.

Persico says the station is being closed “because it does not provide absolute loyalty. It has criticism of the government.”

The moves against foreign outlets as justified for state security and the planned closure of IDF Radio “are steps that lead to an authoritarian regime,” he adds.

You might also like
  • ‘Israel is systemically eliminating Palestinian collective life’:  B’Tselem
    Deborah Stone
  • Tame apologises – but with little grace
    Deborah Stone
  • Confronting Richard Flanagan and the myth of the Israel lobby
    Mary Garden
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Erdogan Turkey
    AnalysisIsrael

    Turkey emerges as military threat to Israel

    Dror Doron
    Woman with land and houses behind her
    NewsAustralia

    Australia to increase sanctions against West Bank settlements

    Deborah Stone 2
    haredi street guitar
    Photo EssayArts & Culture

    Jerusalemites through the lens

    Sharon Gabay

About the author

Ben Lynfield

Ben Lynfield

Ben Lynfield covered Israeli and Palestinian politics for The Independent and served as Middle Eastern affairs correspondent at The Jerusalem Post. He writes for publications in the region and has contributed to the Christian Science Monitor, Foreign Policy and the New Statesman.

More from the author

FeatureIsrael

Fear of Netanyahu victory may drive big surge in Palestinian voter turnout

NewsIsrael

Abuse by IDF soldiers humiliates Muslim Palestinians

OpinionIsrael

Qusra siege exposes shared agenda of IDF and settler extremists

AnalysisIsrael

IDF ordered to evict West Bank camp in election show of strength

Comments

No comments on this article yet. Be the first to add your thoughts.