Aa
  • Read, Watch, Listen
  • TJI Series
  • Community Action
  • Events
  • Zedi
Follow us and continue the conversation
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Test yourself with the TJI Quiz!

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

Original reporting, insightful analysis and diverse views, delivered straight to your inbox

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Your support fuels our mission to inform, entertain and inspire.

The Jewish Independent is bound by the Standards of Practice of the Australian Press Council. If you believe the Standards may have been breached, you may approach The Jewish Independent or make a complaint to the Australian Press Council in writing at www.presscouncil.org.au. The Council may also be contacted on 1800 025 712.

  • Our Story
  • Contact us
  • Our Team
  • Support us
  • Guidelines
  • Pitch your idea
  • Republishing us
  • Community Action
  • Our Awards
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • FaceBook
  • X
  • YouTube
Aboriginal FlagTorres Strait Islanders Flag

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

© The Jewish Independent 2026All Rights Reserved
Website design and development by Your Creative, MelbourneTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
HomeRead, Watch, ListenAustralia
OpinionAustraliaIsrael

Recognising Palestine is both a strategic and moral act

Recognition won't stop the war in Gaza but it may open up a political horizon for a long-term end to the conflict.
Ric Benjamin
Print this
Black white green and red flag on a flag pole featuring a climbing man with a bird flying nearby

A Palestinian flag flies on a flagpole which features a climbing man in Ramallah (Deborah Stone)

Published: 11 August 2025

Last updated: 11 August 2025

“How are you... all things considered?” is how nearly every conversation starts these days—with Jewish friends and with Palestinian friends.  

For nine months in 2023, “all things considered” referred to the internal collapse of Israeli democracy under its far-right government. Then came October 7, and our worlds were shattered. Hamas’s horrifying attacks killed over 1,200 Israelis and took hundreds of hostages in a single day. The trauma was profound, personal, collective. 

Since then, “all things considered” has come to encompass the continued captivity of Israeli hostages, but also the death of more than 60,000 Gazans, the forced displacement of nearly the entire population, and the fact that half a million children no longer have homes or schools. Starvation is now widespread. It is a manmade catastrophe of unthinkable scale. 

Palestinian recognition can strengthen moderates, undercut extremist narratives, and give the Palestinian Authority the legitimacy—and pressure—it needs to govern responsibly

Into this pain comes a political question: Should countries like Australia join the more than 140 UN member states that formally recognise the State of Palestine, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese today promised Australia will do at the next United Nations General Assembly meeting in September? 

Recognition won’t stop the war in Gaza tomorrow. But it may help end the moral paralysis that has allowed mass suffering to become normalised. And it may finally open a political horizon that’s been shut for too long. 

Recognising Palestine does not reward terrorism or undermine Israel’s right to exist. It is a strategic and moral act that acknowledges the national aspirations of the Palestinian people, while affirming the same right for Jews to live securely in a democratic homeland. 

To oppose recognition on the grounds that “the time isn’t right” is to ignore that the right time has never come. Delay has only entrenched despair. When Israel declared independence in 1948, its borders weren’t finalised. Its internal politics were in flux. And yet the world recognised its right to statehood. Palestinians deserve the same. 

Let’s be clear: Hamas has never supported two states. It was founded in opposition to the 1988 PLO declaration that recognised Israel and called for a Palestinian state alongside it. Recognition of Palestine is not a reward for Hamas. It’s a rejection of them. It says: we believe in diplomacy, not terror. We believe that millions of Palestinians who yearn for a peaceful, dignified future have the right to pursue it. 

In the wake of the destruction of Gaza, and the suffering of its people, which have followed from Hamas’ October 7 attack on Israel, the world is waking up to the need for a political solution that upholds the humanity of both peoples. 

Changing conditions

Two major diplomatic moments this year have made that possible. 

On June 10, Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas issued a six-point statement that should have been front-page news. He condemned the October 7 attacks, called for the release of hostages, pledged to disarm Hamas, end the prisoner payment system, reform school curricula, hold democratic elections within a year, and—most significantly—accepted a demilitarised Palestinian state. 

Then, on July 25, the Saudi-French initiative brought together the 22 Arab League members, all 27 EU states, and 17 other nations. Together, they condemned Hamas’s actions and called for it to relinquish control of Gaza to a reformed Palestinian Authority. It was the first time such unified Arab condemnation had ever been voiced. 

That’s everything Israel and its allies have long demanded. And yet, Israel’s government dismissed both initiatives outright. Prime Minister Netanyahu and his ministers reject the two-state solution. They talk openly of annexation and permanent occupation. 

A diplomatic circuit breaker

To them, Palestinian recognition is a threat. But to the rest of us—those who believe in a secure Israel and a free Palestine—it’s a path forward. A diplomatic circuit breaker. Not a final step, but a necessary one. 

In this context, and with Israel again escalating the war that threatens the deaths of more innocent Gazans and the remaining hostages, we are right to support the Australian government’s move of recognition with pre-conditions to support a two-state solution. This would align with allies like Canada, the UK, and France who have used elements of the PA and Saudi-French initiatives to reframe what peace could look like. It would be a principled move by Australia. Not just strategic—but deeply moral. 

Palestinian recognition can strengthen moderates, undercut extremist narratives, and give the Palestinian Authority the legitimacy—and pressure—it needs to govern responsibly. It can also send a message to Israel: that endless settlement expansion and occupation are not sustainable, nor acceptable. 

Jewish voices are demanding change. 4,000 prominent Jewish philanthropists and former government ministers from 18 different countries have called for the end of the war and for Israel not to resettle Gaza. Over 1,100 rabbis have signed statements condemning the war’s civilian toll. Hundreds of former Israeli security chiefs have called on Trump for a ceasefire and hostage deal. Thousands of Israelis protest daily—holding images of starving Gazan children with signs that say “Not in our name.” 

These are not fringe voices. They are voices of grief, responsibility, and courage. 

Palestinian recognition can undercuts extremist narratives that claim only violence can bring results. It gives diplomatic tools to moderates and fosters a climate where compromise becomes possible. 

Israel’s Declaration of Independence promised “complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants” and extended a hand of peace to its neighbours. Recognition of Palestine is a fulfillment—not a betrayal—of that founding vision. 

You might also like
  • Normality or Sparta: Israel’s choice could hardly be clearer
    The Jewish Independent
  • Fighting for a better Israel 
    Peter Kohn
  • Where are the women in this election campaign?
    Eetta Prince-Gibson
logomark.67a07ee3
We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by using our Creative Commons licence

You might also like

    Protest against settler violence in Jerusalem
    Israel

    Record spike in settler violence ahead of election

    Ben Lynfield
    TOPSHOT-ISRAEL-POLITICS-ELECTION
    Israel Votes 2026ExplainerIsrael

    Your Israel election cheat sheet

    Deborah Stone
    [[:fr:Fez (coiffure)|Fez]] rouge à gland noir, en feutre.
    Israel Votes 2026AnalysisIsrael

    ‘Moroccan monkey’: Israel’s ethnic divide still shapes its elections

    Shahar Burla

About the author

Ric Benjamin

Ric Benjamin

Ric Benjamin has been a social justice activist for 30 years and is currently the chair of the New Israel Fund Australia.

More from the author

AnalysisIsrael

What Israel’s activists can learn from Australian firefighters

AnalysisIsrael

Three moves that could put a two-state solution within reach

FeatureIsrael

Making a difference in the Palestinian territories, one flock at a time